Abstract
Objective: Age-related declines in dehydroepiandroserone (DHEA) and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) have been postulated to aggravate some diseases of the elderly. As a result, DHEA supplementation is often touted as the "fountain of youth" and is being used widely in an unregulated fashion, without evidence of efficacy or safety. Design: Review of the English-language literature. This review addresses DHEA replacement, touching on issues of bioavailability and possible beneficial effects. Safety concerns are also addressed. Conclusions: At present, we believe that DHEA replacement is not suitable for widespread clinical use; however, the potential for future hormonal therapy of aging with this compound is such that further investigation is certainly warranted.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 225-231 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Menopause |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| State | Published - 1997 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Adrenal androgens
- Aging
- DHEA
- DHEA replacement
- DHEA-S
- Hormonal replacement
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) replacement in postmenopausal women: Present status and future promise'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS