Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction without microsurgery fellowship training

Hakan Orbay, Brittany K. Busse, Thomas R. Stevenson, Howard T Wang, David E. Sahar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction requires complex microsurgical skills. Herein, we examine whether DIEP flap breast reconstruction can be performed safely without microsurgical fellowship training. Methods: A total of 28 patients and 34 DIEP flaps were included in the study. We reviewed the medical records of patients for donor site and flap-related complications and analyzed the correlation between the complications and preoperative risk factors. We also performed a literature review to compare complication rates in our series with the literature. Results: We observed total flap necrosis in 1 patient (2.9%), partial flap necrosis in 5 patients (14.7%), infection in 1 patient (2.9%), hematoma/ seroma in 3 patients (8.8%), donor site complications in 5 patients (18.5%), venous occlusion in 4 patients (11.7%), and arterial occlusion in 1 patient (2.9%). We did not observe any correlation between complications and preoperative risk factors. Literature review yielded 18 papers that met our inclusion criteria. Partial flap necrosis rate was significantly higher in our series compared with literature (14.7% vs 1.6%, P = 0.003). Venous complication rate was marginally higher in our series compared with literature (11.7% vs 3.3%, P = 0.057). However, total flap loss rate in our series was comparable with the literature (2.9% vs 2.2%, P = 0.759). Conclusion: With proper training during plastic surgery residency, DIEP flap can be performed with acceptable morbidity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere455
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open
Volume3
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Epigastric Arteries
Perforator Flap
Microsurgery
Mammaplasty
Necrosis
Tissue Donors
Seroma
Plastic Surgery
Internship and Residency
Hematoma
Medical Records
Morbidity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction without microsurgery fellowship training. / Orbay, Hakan; Busse, Brittany K.; Stevenson, Thomas R.; Wang, Howard T; Sahar, David E.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open, Vol. 3, No. 7, e455, 01.01.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f00d49c2713f46d7be3524c74314928e,
title = "Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction without microsurgery fellowship training",
abstract = "Background: Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction requires complex microsurgical skills. Herein, we examine whether DIEP flap breast reconstruction can be performed safely without microsurgical fellowship training. Methods: A total of 28 patients and 34 DIEP flaps were included in the study. We reviewed the medical records of patients for donor site and flap-related complications and analyzed the correlation between the complications and preoperative risk factors. We also performed a literature review to compare complication rates in our series with the literature. Results: We observed total flap necrosis in 1 patient (2.9{\%}), partial flap necrosis in 5 patients (14.7{\%}), infection in 1 patient (2.9{\%}), hematoma/ seroma in 3 patients (8.8{\%}), donor site complications in 5 patients (18.5{\%}), venous occlusion in 4 patients (11.7{\%}), and arterial occlusion in 1 patient (2.9{\%}). We did not observe any correlation between complications and preoperative risk factors. Literature review yielded 18 papers that met our inclusion criteria. Partial flap necrosis rate was significantly higher in our series compared with literature (14.7{\%} vs 1.6{\%}, P = 0.003). Venous complication rate was marginally higher in our series compared with literature (11.7{\%} vs 3.3{\%}, P = 0.057). However, total flap loss rate in our series was comparable with the literature (2.9{\%} vs 2.2{\%}, P = 0.759). Conclusion: With proper training during plastic surgery residency, DIEP flap can be performed with acceptable morbidity.",
author = "Hakan Orbay and Busse, {Brittany K.} and Stevenson, {Thomas R.} and Wang, {Howard T} and Sahar, {David E.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/GOX.0000000000000428",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open",
issn = "2169-7574",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction without microsurgery fellowship training

AU - Orbay, Hakan

AU - Busse, Brittany K.

AU - Stevenson, Thomas R.

AU - Wang, Howard T

AU - Sahar, David E.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Background: Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction requires complex microsurgical skills. Herein, we examine whether DIEP flap breast reconstruction can be performed safely without microsurgical fellowship training. Methods: A total of 28 patients and 34 DIEP flaps were included in the study. We reviewed the medical records of patients for donor site and flap-related complications and analyzed the correlation between the complications and preoperative risk factors. We also performed a literature review to compare complication rates in our series with the literature. Results: We observed total flap necrosis in 1 patient (2.9%), partial flap necrosis in 5 patients (14.7%), infection in 1 patient (2.9%), hematoma/ seroma in 3 patients (8.8%), donor site complications in 5 patients (18.5%), venous occlusion in 4 patients (11.7%), and arterial occlusion in 1 patient (2.9%). We did not observe any correlation between complications and preoperative risk factors. Literature review yielded 18 papers that met our inclusion criteria. Partial flap necrosis rate was significantly higher in our series compared with literature (14.7% vs 1.6%, P = 0.003). Venous complication rate was marginally higher in our series compared with literature (11.7% vs 3.3%, P = 0.057). However, total flap loss rate in our series was comparable with the literature (2.9% vs 2.2%, P = 0.759). Conclusion: With proper training during plastic surgery residency, DIEP flap can be performed with acceptable morbidity.

AB - Background: Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction requires complex microsurgical skills. Herein, we examine whether DIEP flap breast reconstruction can be performed safely without microsurgical fellowship training. Methods: A total of 28 patients and 34 DIEP flaps were included in the study. We reviewed the medical records of patients for donor site and flap-related complications and analyzed the correlation between the complications and preoperative risk factors. We also performed a literature review to compare complication rates in our series with the literature. Results: We observed total flap necrosis in 1 patient (2.9%), partial flap necrosis in 5 patients (14.7%), infection in 1 patient (2.9%), hematoma/ seroma in 3 patients (8.8%), donor site complications in 5 patients (18.5%), venous occlusion in 4 patients (11.7%), and arterial occlusion in 1 patient (2.9%). We did not observe any correlation between complications and preoperative risk factors. Literature review yielded 18 papers that met our inclusion criteria. Partial flap necrosis rate was significantly higher in our series compared with literature (14.7% vs 1.6%, P = 0.003). Venous complication rate was marginally higher in our series compared with literature (11.7% vs 3.3%, P = 0.057). However, total flap loss rate in our series was comparable with the literature (2.9% vs 2.2%, P = 0.759). Conclusion: With proper training during plastic surgery residency, DIEP flap can be performed with acceptable morbidity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047304530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047304530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000428

DO - 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000428

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85047304530

VL - 3

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open

SN - 2169-7574

IS - 7

M1 - e455

ER -