Contrast agents for cardiac catheterization: Conceptions and misconceptions

Walter C. Brogan, L. David Hillis, Richard A. Lange

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ionic and nonionic contrast materials are similarly efficacious in providing excellent images with minimal risk to the patient. In comparison with ionic media, the nonionic agents produce minor alterations in intracardiac and peripheral pressures as well as in electrocardiographic intervals and morphology (Table II). In addition, nonionic media are less often associated with undersirable symptoms, such as flushing and vomiting. At the same time, ionic and nonionic media are accompanied by a similar incidence of nephrotoxicity, serious arrhythmias, and death. Finally, nonionic contrast material is substantially more expensive than ionic media. In light of this marked difference in cost, one could argue that nonionic media should be reserved for "high-risk" patients, that is, those with a history of a serious adverse reaction to ionic contrast media and those in whom contrast-induced hypotension would be particularly deleterious.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1129-1135
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Heart Journal
Volume122
Issue number4 PART 1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cardiac Catheterization
Contrast Media
Controlled Hypotension
Vomiting
Cardiac Arrhythmias
Pressure
Costs and Cost Analysis
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Contrast agents for cardiac catheterization : Conceptions and misconceptions. / Brogan, Walter C.; Hillis, L. David; Lange, Richard A.

In: American Heart Journal, Vol. 122, No. 4 PART 1, 1991, p. 1129-1135.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brogan, Walter C. ; Hillis, L. David ; Lange, Richard A. / Contrast agents for cardiac catheterization : Conceptions and misconceptions. In: American Heart Journal. 1991 ; Vol. 122, No. 4 PART 1. pp. 1129-1135.
@article{b988f066264e429c8f937dd9bf6a65c8,
title = "Contrast agents for cardiac catheterization: Conceptions and misconceptions",
abstract = "Ionic and nonionic contrast materials are similarly efficacious in providing excellent images with minimal risk to the patient. In comparison with ionic media, the nonionic agents produce minor alterations in intracardiac and peripheral pressures as well as in electrocardiographic intervals and morphology (Table II). In addition, nonionic media are less often associated with undersirable symptoms, such as flushing and vomiting. At the same time, ionic and nonionic media are accompanied by a similar incidence of nephrotoxicity, serious arrhythmias, and death. Finally, nonionic contrast material is substantially more expensive than ionic media. In light of this marked difference in cost, one could argue that nonionic media should be reserved for {"}high-risk{"} patients, that is, those with a history of a serious adverse reaction to ionic contrast media and those in whom contrast-induced hypotension would be particularly deleterious.",
author = "Brogan, {Walter C.} and Hillis, {L. David} and Lange, {Richard A.}",
year = "1991",
doi = "10.1016/0002-8703(91)90481-V",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "122",
pages = "1129--1135",
journal = "American Heart Journal",
issn = "0002-8703",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4 PART 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contrast agents for cardiac catheterization

T2 - Conceptions and misconceptions

AU - Brogan, Walter C.

AU - Hillis, L. David

AU - Lange, Richard A.

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - Ionic and nonionic contrast materials are similarly efficacious in providing excellent images with minimal risk to the patient. In comparison with ionic media, the nonionic agents produce minor alterations in intracardiac and peripheral pressures as well as in electrocardiographic intervals and morphology (Table II). In addition, nonionic media are less often associated with undersirable symptoms, such as flushing and vomiting. At the same time, ionic and nonionic media are accompanied by a similar incidence of nephrotoxicity, serious arrhythmias, and death. Finally, nonionic contrast material is substantially more expensive than ionic media. In light of this marked difference in cost, one could argue that nonionic media should be reserved for "high-risk" patients, that is, those with a history of a serious adverse reaction to ionic contrast media and those in whom contrast-induced hypotension would be particularly deleterious.

AB - Ionic and nonionic contrast materials are similarly efficacious in providing excellent images with minimal risk to the patient. In comparison with ionic media, the nonionic agents produce minor alterations in intracardiac and peripheral pressures as well as in electrocardiographic intervals and morphology (Table II). In addition, nonionic media are less often associated with undersirable symptoms, such as flushing and vomiting. At the same time, ionic and nonionic media are accompanied by a similar incidence of nephrotoxicity, serious arrhythmias, and death. Finally, nonionic contrast material is substantially more expensive than ionic media. In light of this marked difference in cost, one could argue that nonionic media should be reserved for "high-risk" patients, that is, those with a history of a serious adverse reaction to ionic contrast media and those in whom contrast-induced hypotension would be particularly deleterious.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026091895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026091895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0002-8703(91)90481-V

DO - 10.1016/0002-8703(91)90481-V

M3 - Article

C2 - 1927863

AN - SCOPUS:0026091895

VL - 122

SP - 1129

EP - 1135

JO - American Heart Journal

JF - American Heart Journal

SN - 0002-8703

IS - 4 PART 1

ER -