Contingencies for Change in Complacent Smokers

Richard J Lamb, Andrew R. Morral, Kimberly C. Kirby, Martin A Javors, Gregory Galbicka, Martin Iguchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The majority of smokers have no plans to quit in the near future. These complacent smokers are less likely to quit than other smokers, and few interventions are known to reduce smoking in this population. Although monetary incentives can reduce complacent smokers' breath carbon monoxide (BCO) levels, it is not clear whether these effects can be sustained beyond the several weeks that past studies have examined. The authors compared complacent smokers randomly assigned to receive incentives for BCO reductions (n = 18) or noncontingent incentives (n = 19) for 3 months. Contingent incentives were associated with (a) reduced BCO; (b) more BCO samples indicative of abstinence; (c) fewer cigarettes smoked and more days abstinent at study end; and (d) lower salivary cotinine. These behaviors can predict future cessation, and 2 of the 18 smokers (11%) receiving BCO-contingent incentives reported quitting as compared with none in the control group. Contingency management procedures, such as those used here, may effectively promote cessation among complacent smokers and provide a model for understanding the possible effects of some environmental interventions (like workplace smoking bans) on the behavior of complacent smokers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)245-255
Number of pages11
JournalExperimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2007

Fingerprint

Carbon Monoxide
Motivation
Smoking
Cotinine
Tobacco Products
Workplace
Control Groups
Population

Keywords

  • contingency management
  • precontemplators
  • shaping
  • smoking cessation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Contingencies for Change in Complacent Smokers. / Lamb, Richard J; Morral, Andrew R.; Kirby, Kimberly C.; Javors, Martin A; Galbicka, Gregory; Iguchi, Martin.

In: Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, Vol. 15, No. 3, 06.2007, p. 245-255.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lamb, RJ, Morral, AR, Kirby, KC, Javors, MA, Galbicka, G & Iguchi, M 2007, 'Contingencies for Change in Complacent Smokers', Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 245-255. https://doi.org/10.1037/1064-1297.15.3.245
Lamb, Richard J ; Morral, Andrew R. ; Kirby, Kimberly C. ; Javors, Martin A ; Galbicka, Gregory ; Iguchi, Martin. / Contingencies for Change in Complacent Smokers. In: Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2007 ; Vol. 15, No. 3. pp. 245-255.
@article{475b0c0e8a6245c7896ddc5c9fdd3940,
title = "Contingencies for Change in Complacent Smokers",
abstract = "The majority of smokers have no plans to quit in the near future. These complacent smokers are less likely to quit than other smokers, and few interventions are known to reduce smoking in this population. Although monetary incentives can reduce complacent smokers' breath carbon monoxide (BCO) levels, it is not clear whether these effects can be sustained beyond the several weeks that past studies have examined. The authors compared complacent smokers randomly assigned to receive incentives for BCO reductions (n = 18) or noncontingent incentives (n = 19) for 3 months. Contingent incentives were associated with (a) reduced BCO; (b) more BCO samples indicative of abstinence; (c) fewer cigarettes smoked and more days abstinent at study end; and (d) lower salivary cotinine. These behaviors can predict future cessation, and 2 of the 18 smokers (11{\%}) receiving BCO-contingent incentives reported quitting as compared with none in the control group. Contingency management procedures, such as those used here, may effectively promote cessation among complacent smokers and provide a model for understanding the possible effects of some environmental interventions (like workplace smoking bans) on the behavior of complacent smokers.",
keywords = "contingency management, precontemplators, shaping, smoking cessation",
author = "Lamb, {Richard J} and Morral, {Andrew R.} and Kirby, {Kimberly C.} and Javors, {Martin A} and Gregory Galbicka and Martin Iguchi",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1037/1064-1297.15.3.245",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "245--255",
journal = "Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology",
issn = "1064-1297",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contingencies for Change in Complacent Smokers

AU - Lamb, Richard J

AU - Morral, Andrew R.

AU - Kirby, Kimberly C.

AU - Javors, Martin A

AU - Galbicka, Gregory

AU - Iguchi, Martin

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - The majority of smokers have no plans to quit in the near future. These complacent smokers are less likely to quit than other smokers, and few interventions are known to reduce smoking in this population. Although monetary incentives can reduce complacent smokers' breath carbon monoxide (BCO) levels, it is not clear whether these effects can be sustained beyond the several weeks that past studies have examined. The authors compared complacent smokers randomly assigned to receive incentives for BCO reductions (n = 18) or noncontingent incentives (n = 19) for 3 months. Contingent incentives were associated with (a) reduced BCO; (b) more BCO samples indicative of abstinence; (c) fewer cigarettes smoked and more days abstinent at study end; and (d) lower salivary cotinine. These behaviors can predict future cessation, and 2 of the 18 smokers (11%) receiving BCO-contingent incentives reported quitting as compared with none in the control group. Contingency management procedures, such as those used here, may effectively promote cessation among complacent smokers and provide a model for understanding the possible effects of some environmental interventions (like workplace smoking bans) on the behavior of complacent smokers.

AB - The majority of smokers have no plans to quit in the near future. These complacent smokers are less likely to quit than other smokers, and few interventions are known to reduce smoking in this population. Although monetary incentives can reduce complacent smokers' breath carbon monoxide (BCO) levels, it is not clear whether these effects can be sustained beyond the several weeks that past studies have examined. The authors compared complacent smokers randomly assigned to receive incentives for BCO reductions (n = 18) or noncontingent incentives (n = 19) for 3 months. Contingent incentives were associated with (a) reduced BCO; (b) more BCO samples indicative of abstinence; (c) fewer cigarettes smoked and more days abstinent at study end; and (d) lower salivary cotinine. These behaviors can predict future cessation, and 2 of the 18 smokers (11%) receiving BCO-contingent incentives reported quitting as compared with none in the control group. Contingency management procedures, such as those used here, may effectively promote cessation among complacent smokers and provide a model for understanding the possible effects of some environmental interventions (like workplace smoking bans) on the behavior of complacent smokers.

KW - contingency management

KW - precontemplators

KW - shaping

KW - smoking cessation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34447344871&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34447344871&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/1064-1297.15.3.245

DO - 10.1037/1064-1297.15.3.245

M3 - Article

C2 - 17563211

AN - SCOPUS:34447344871

VL - 15

SP - 245

EP - 255

JO - Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology

JF - Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology

SN - 1064-1297

IS - 3

ER -