Continence Definition After Radical Prostatectomy Using Urinary Quality of Life: Evaluation of Patient Reported Validated Questionnaires

Michael A Liss, Kathryn Osann, Noah Canvasser, William Chu, Alexandra Chang, Jennifer Gan, Roger Li, Rosanne Santos, Douglas Skarecky, David S. Finley, Thomas E. Ahlering

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

74 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: After radical prostatectomy continence is commonly defined as no pads except a security pad or 0 to 1 pad. We evaluated the association of pad status and urinary quality of life to determine whether security and 1 pad status differ from pad-free status to better define 0 pads as the post-prostatectomy standard. Materials and Methods: A total of 500 consecutive men underwent robot assisted radical prostatectomy from October 2003 to July 2007. Data were collected prospectively and entered into an electronic database. Postoperatively men completed self-administered validated questionnaires including questions on 1) daily pad use (0, security, 1, or 2 or more), 2) urine leakage (daily, about once weekly, less than once weekly or not at all), 3) urinary control (none, frequent dribbling, occasional dribbling or total control), 4) American Urological Association symptom score and 5) urinary quality of life. Results: Postoperatively men who indicated 0 pad use had a mean ± SE symptom score of 5.8 ± 0.3 and pleased quality of life (1.16 ± 0.08). In contrast, men with a security pad and 1 pad had a symptom score of 7.6 ± 0.7 and 9.2 ± 0.6 but mixed quality of life (2.78 ± 0.18 and 3.41 ± 0.15, respectively, p <0.0005). Conclusions: Results show a significant decrease in quality of life between no pads (1.16 or pleased), a security pad and 0 or 1 pad (2.78 and 3.41 or mixed, respectively). Findings do not support defining continence with a security pad or 0 to 1 pad. Continence should be strictly defined as 0 pads.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1464-1468
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume183
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Prostatectomy
Quality of Life
Surveys and Questionnaires
Urine
Databases

Keywords

  • incontinence pads
  • prostate
  • prostatectomy
  • quality of life
  • questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Continence Definition After Radical Prostatectomy Using Urinary Quality of Life : Evaluation of Patient Reported Validated Questionnaires. / Liss, Michael A; Osann, Kathryn; Canvasser, Noah; Chu, William; Chang, Alexandra; Gan, Jennifer; Li, Roger; Santos, Rosanne; Skarecky, Douglas; Finley, David S.; Ahlering, Thomas E.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 183, No. 4, 01.04.2010, p. 1464-1468.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Liss, MA, Osann, K, Canvasser, N, Chu, W, Chang, A, Gan, J, Li, R, Santos, R, Skarecky, D, Finley, DS & Ahlering, TE 2010, 'Continence Definition After Radical Prostatectomy Using Urinary Quality of Life: Evaluation of Patient Reported Validated Questionnaires', Journal of Urology, vol. 183, no. 4, pp. 1464-1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.009
Liss, Michael A ; Osann, Kathryn ; Canvasser, Noah ; Chu, William ; Chang, Alexandra ; Gan, Jennifer ; Li, Roger ; Santos, Rosanne ; Skarecky, Douglas ; Finley, David S. ; Ahlering, Thomas E. / Continence Definition After Radical Prostatectomy Using Urinary Quality of Life : Evaluation of Patient Reported Validated Questionnaires. In: Journal of Urology. 2010 ; Vol. 183, No. 4. pp. 1464-1468.
@article{c263a31b0a63447a88dce22e444dc733,
title = "Continence Definition After Radical Prostatectomy Using Urinary Quality of Life: Evaluation of Patient Reported Validated Questionnaires",
abstract = "Purpose: After radical prostatectomy continence is commonly defined as no pads except a security pad or 0 to 1 pad. We evaluated the association of pad status and urinary quality of life to determine whether security and 1 pad status differ from pad-free status to better define 0 pads as the post-prostatectomy standard. Materials and Methods: A total of 500 consecutive men underwent robot assisted radical prostatectomy from October 2003 to July 2007. Data were collected prospectively and entered into an electronic database. Postoperatively men completed self-administered validated questionnaires including questions on 1) daily pad use (0, security, 1, or 2 or more), 2) urine leakage (daily, about once weekly, less than once weekly or not at all), 3) urinary control (none, frequent dribbling, occasional dribbling or total control), 4) American Urological Association symptom score and 5) urinary quality of life. Results: Postoperatively men who indicated 0 pad use had a mean ± SE symptom score of 5.8 ± 0.3 and pleased quality of life (1.16 ± 0.08). In contrast, men with a security pad and 1 pad had a symptom score of 7.6 ± 0.7 and 9.2 ± 0.6 but mixed quality of life (2.78 ± 0.18 and 3.41 ± 0.15, respectively, p <0.0005). Conclusions: Results show a significant decrease in quality of life between no pads (1.16 or pleased), a security pad and 0 or 1 pad (2.78 and 3.41 or mixed, respectively). Findings do not support defining continence with a security pad or 0 to 1 pad. Continence should be strictly defined as 0 pads.",
keywords = "incontinence pads, prostate, prostatectomy, quality of life, questionnaires",
author = "Liss, {Michael A} and Kathryn Osann and Noah Canvasser and William Chu and Alexandra Chang and Jennifer Gan and Roger Li and Rosanne Santos and Douglas Skarecky and Finley, {David S.} and Ahlering, {Thomas E.}",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "183",
pages = "1464--1468",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Continence Definition After Radical Prostatectomy Using Urinary Quality of Life

T2 - Evaluation of Patient Reported Validated Questionnaires

AU - Liss, Michael A

AU - Osann, Kathryn

AU - Canvasser, Noah

AU - Chu, William

AU - Chang, Alexandra

AU - Gan, Jennifer

AU - Li, Roger

AU - Santos, Rosanne

AU - Skarecky, Douglas

AU - Finley, David S.

AU - Ahlering, Thomas E.

PY - 2010/4/1

Y1 - 2010/4/1

N2 - Purpose: After radical prostatectomy continence is commonly defined as no pads except a security pad or 0 to 1 pad. We evaluated the association of pad status and urinary quality of life to determine whether security and 1 pad status differ from pad-free status to better define 0 pads as the post-prostatectomy standard. Materials and Methods: A total of 500 consecutive men underwent robot assisted radical prostatectomy from October 2003 to July 2007. Data were collected prospectively and entered into an electronic database. Postoperatively men completed self-administered validated questionnaires including questions on 1) daily pad use (0, security, 1, or 2 or more), 2) urine leakage (daily, about once weekly, less than once weekly or not at all), 3) urinary control (none, frequent dribbling, occasional dribbling or total control), 4) American Urological Association symptom score and 5) urinary quality of life. Results: Postoperatively men who indicated 0 pad use had a mean ± SE symptom score of 5.8 ± 0.3 and pleased quality of life (1.16 ± 0.08). In contrast, men with a security pad and 1 pad had a symptom score of 7.6 ± 0.7 and 9.2 ± 0.6 but mixed quality of life (2.78 ± 0.18 and 3.41 ± 0.15, respectively, p <0.0005). Conclusions: Results show a significant decrease in quality of life between no pads (1.16 or pleased), a security pad and 0 or 1 pad (2.78 and 3.41 or mixed, respectively). Findings do not support defining continence with a security pad or 0 to 1 pad. Continence should be strictly defined as 0 pads.

AB - Purpose: After radical prostatectomy continence is commonly defined as no pads except a security pad or 0 to 1 pad. We evaluated the association of pad status and urinary quality of life to determine whether security and 1 pad status differ from pad-free status to better define 0 pads as the post-prostatectomy standard. Materials and Methods: A total of 500 consecutive men underwent robot assisted radical prostatectomy from October 2003 to July 2007. Data were collected prospectively and entered into an electronic database. Postoperatively men completed self-administered validated questionnaires including questions on 1) daily pad use (0, security, 1, or 2 or more), 2) urine leakage (daily, about once weekly, less than once weekly or not at all), 3) urinary control (none, frequent dribbling, occasional dribbling or total control), 4) American Urological Association symptom score and 5) urinary quality of life. Results: Postoperatively men who indicated 0 pad use had a mean ± SE symptom score of 5.8 ± 0.3 and pleased quality of life (1.16 ± 0.08). In contrast, men with a security pad and 1 pad had a symptom score of 7.6 ± 0.7 and 9.2 ± 0.6 but mixed quality of life (2.78 ± 0.18 and 3.41 ± 0.15, respectively, p <0.0005). Conclusions: Results show a significant decrease in quality of life between no pads (1.16 or pleased), a security pad and 0 or 1 pad (2.78 and 3.41 or mixed, respectively). Findings do not support defining continence with a security pad or 0 to 1 pad. Continence should be strictly defined as 0 pads.

KW - incontinence pads

KW - prostate

KW - prostatectomy

KW - quality of life

KW - questionnaires

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949278687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949278687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.009

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 20171689

AN - SCOPUS:77949278687

VL - 183

SP - 1464

EP - 1468

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 4

ER -