Consistency and reproducibility of the VMAT plan delivery using three independent validation methods

Varatharaj Chandraraj, Sotirios Stathakis, Ravikumar Manickam, Carlos Esquivel, Sanjay S. Supe, Nikos Papanikolaou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The complexity of VMAT delivery requires new methods and potentially new tools for the commissioning of these systems. It appears that great consideration is needed for quality assurance (QA) of these treatments since there are limited devices that are dedicated to the QA of rotational delivery. In this present study, we have evaluated the consistency and reproducibility of one prostate and one lung VMAT plans for 31 consecutive days using three different approaches: 1) MLC DynaLog files, 2) in vivo measurements using the multiwire ionization chamber DAVID, and 3) using PTWseven29 2D ARRAY with the OCTAVIUS phantom at our Varian Clinac linear accelerator. Overall, the three methods of testing the reproducibility and consistency of the VMAT delivery were in agreement with each other. All methods showed minimal daily deviations that contributed to clinically insignificant dose variations from day to day. Based on our results, we conclude that the VMAT delivery using a Varian 2100CD linear accelerator equipped with 120 MLC is highly reproducible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)129-140
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Volume12
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Linear accelerators
Quality assurance
delivery
Particle Accelerators
Ionization chambers
assurance
linear accelerators
Prostate
Testing
ionization chambers
files
lungs
Equipment and Supplies
Lung
deviation
dosage

Keywords

  • DAVID
  • DynaLog files
  • PTW seven29 ARRAY
  • Quality assurance
  • VMAT

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiation
  • Instrumentation

Cite this

Consistency and reproducibility of the VMAT plan delivery using three independent validation methods. / Chandraraj, Varatharaj; Stathakis, Sotirios; Manickam, Ravikumar; Esquivel, Carlos; Supe, Sanjay S.; Papanikolaou, Nikos.

In: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2011, p. 129-140.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chandraraj, Varatharaj ; Stathakis, Sotirios ; Manickam, Ravikumar ; Esquivel, Carlos ; Supe, Sanjay S. ; Papanikolaou, Nikos. / Consistency and reproducibility of the VMAT plan delivery using three independent validation methods. In: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. 2011 ; Vol. 12, No. 1. pp. 129-140.
@article{a52bac540a3c435eae764610cf5c7ede,
title = "Consistency and reproducibility of the VMAT plan delivery using three independent validation methods",
abstract = "The complexity of VMAT delivery requires new methods and potentially new tools for the commissioning of these systems. It appears that great consideration is needed for quality assurance (QA) of these treatments since there are limited devices that are dedicated to the QA of rotational delivery. In this present study, we have evaluated the consistency and reproducibility of one prostate and one lung VMAT plans for 31 consecutive days using three different approaches: 1) MLC DynaLog files, 2) in vivo measurements using the multiwire ionization chamber DAVID, and 3) using PTWseven29 2D ARRAY with the OCTAVIUS phantom at our Varian Clinac linear accelerator. Overall, the three methods of testing the reproducibility and consistency of the VMAT delivery were in agreement with each other. All methods showed minimal daily deviations that contributed to clinically insignificant dose variations from day to day. Based on our results, we conclude that the VMAT delivery using a Varian 2100CD linear accelerator equipped with 120 MLC is highly reproducible.",
keywords = "DAVID, DynaLog files, PTW seven29 ARRAY, Quality assurance, VMAT",
author = "Varatharaj Chandraraj and Sotirios Stathakis and Ravikumar Manickam and Carlos Esquivel and Supe, {Sanjay S.} and Nikos Papanikolaou",
year = "2011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "129--140",
journal = "Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics",
issn = "1526-9914",
publisher = "American Institute of Physics Publising LLC",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consistency and reproducibility of the VMAT plan delivery using three independent validation methods

AU - Chandraraj, Varatharaj

AU - Stathakis, Sotirios

AU - Manickam, Ravikumar

AU - Esquivel, Carlos

AU - Supe, Sanjay S.

AU - Papanikolaou, Nikos

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The complexity of VMAT delivery requires new methods and potentially new tools for the commissioning of these systems. It appears that great consideration is needed for quality assurance (QA) of these treatments since there are limited devices that are dedicated to the QA of rotational delivery. In this present study, we have evaluated the consistency and reproducibility of one prostate and one lung VMAT plans for 31 consecutive days using three different approaches: 1) MLC DynaLog files, 2) in vivo measurements using the multiwire ionization chamber DAVID, and 3) using PTWseven29 2D ARRAY with the OCTAVIUS phantom at our Varian Clinac linear accelerator. Overall, the three methods of testing the reproducibility and consistency of the VMAT delivery were in agreement with each other. All methods showed minimal daily deviations that contributed to clinically insignificant dose variations from day to day. Based on our results, we conclude that the VMAT delivery using a Varian 2100CD linear accelerator equipped with 120 MLC is highly reproducible.

AB - The complexity of VMAT delivery requires new methods and potentially new tools for the commissioning of these systems. It appears that great consideration is needed for quality assurance (QA) of these treatments since there are limited devices that are dedicated to the QA of rotational delivery. In this present study, we have evaluated the consistency and reproducibility of one prostate and one lung VMAT plans for 31 consecutive days using three different approaches: 1) MLC DynaLog files, 2) in vivo measurements using the multiwire ionization chamber DAVID, and 3) using PTWseven29 2D ARRAY with the OCTAVIUS phantom at our Varian Clinac linear accelerator. Overall, the three methods of testing the reproducibility and consistency of the VMAT delivery were in agreement with each other. All methods showed minimal daily deviations that contributed to clinically insignificant dose variations from day to day. Based on our results, we conclude that the VMAT delivery using a Varian 2100CD linear accelerator equipped with 120 MLC is highly reproducible.

KW - DAVID

KW - DynaLog files

KW - PTW seven29 ARRAY

KW - Quality assurance

KW - VMAT

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951713337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79951713337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 21330988

AN - SCOPUS:79951713337

VL - 12

SP - 129

EP - 140

JO - Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

JF - Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

SN - 1526-9914

IS - 1

ER -