Consecutive versus alternating cycles of ovarian stimulation using human menopausal gonadotrophin

Kaylen M. Silverberg, Nancy A. Klein, William N. Burns, Robert S Schenken, David L. Olive

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ovarian stimulation is an effective treatment for patients with ovulatory dysfunction and unexplained infertility. An initial report has suggested that consecutive cycles of ovarian stimulation can be employed without causing a diminished response in the second cycle. However, this observation has neither been confirmed nor has a regimen of consecutive stimulation cycles been compared to one of alternating stimulation cycles. Accordingly, 44 consecutive and 54 alternating cycles of stimulation were evaluated in patients (n = 42) who were treated with human menopausal gonado-trophin (HMG) alone. Human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) 10 000 IU was administered i.m. when at least one follicle exceeded 16 mm in mean diameter, and this was followed by either intercourse or intrauterine insemination. Using each patient as her own control, we were unable to demonstrate any differences in mean HMG dose requirements, endocrine parameters or follkular development on the day of HCG administration, or ovulation rates in the second consecutive cycle compared to the second alternating cycle. Clinical pregnancies resulted significantly more often in a consecutive cycle (8/22) than in an alternating cycle (2/27, P = 0.029). We conclude that consecutive cycles of ovarian stimulation with HMG are not detrimental and may, in fact, result in increased cycle fecundity compared to alternating stimulation cycles.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)940-944
Number of pages5
JournalHuman Reproduction
Volume7
Issue number7
StatePublished - Aug 1992

Fingerprint

Ovarian Stimulation
Menotropins
Gonadotropins
Ovulation Induction
Consecutive
Chorionic Gonadotropin
Cycle
Insemination
Ovulation
Infertility
Fertility
Pregnancy
Human
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Consecutive cycles
  • Infertility
  • Menotrophins
  • Ovulation induction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
  • Applied Mathematics
  • Physiology (medical)
  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Rehabilitation
  • Developmental Biology
  • Physiology

Cite this

Silverberg, K. M., Klein, N. A., Burns, W. N., Schenken, R. S., & Olive, D. L. (1992). Consecutive versus alternating cycles of ovarian stimulation using human menopausal gonadotrophin. Human Reproduction, 7(7), 940-944.

Consecutive versus alternating cycles of ovarian stimulation using human menopausal gonadotrophin. / Silverberg, Kaylen M.; Klein, Nancy A.; Burns, William N.; Schenken, Robert S; Olive, David L.

In: Human Reproduction, Vol. 7, No. 7, 08.1992, p. 940-944.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Silverberg, KM, Klein, NA, Burns, WN, Schenken, RS & Olive, DL 1992, 'Consecutive versus alternating cycles of ovarian stimulation using human menopausal gonadotrophin', Human Reproduction, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 940-944.
Silverberg, Kaylen M. ; Klein, Nancy A. ; Burns, William N. ; Schenken, Robert S ; Olive, David L. / Consecutive versus alternating cycles of ovarian stimulation using human menopausal gonadotrophin. In: Human Reproduction. 1992 ; Vol. 7, No. 7. pp. 940-944.
@article{520152e174ce444ebdcef31a3fb8741e,
title = "Consecutive versus alternating cycles of ovarian stimulation using human menopausal gonadotrophin",
abstract = "Ovarian stimulation is an effective treatment for patients with ovulatory dysfunction and unexplained infertility. An initial report has suggested that consecutive cycles of ovarian stimulation can be employed without causing a diminished response in the second cycle. However, this observation has neither been confirmed nor has a regimen of consecutive stimulation cycles been compared to one of alternating stimulation cycles. Accordingly, 44 consecutive and 54 alternating cycles of stimulation were evaluated in patients (n = 42) who were treated with human menopausal gonado-trophin (HMG) alone. Human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) 10 000 IU was administered i.m. when at least one follicle exceeded 16 mm in mean diameter, and this was followed by either intercourse or intrauterine insemination. Using each patient as her own control, we were unable to demonstrate any differences in mean HMG dose requirements, endocrine parameters or follkular development on the day of HCG administration, or ovulation rates in the second consecutive cycle compared to the second alternating cycle. Clinical pregnancies resulted significantly more often in a consecutive cycle (8/22) than in an alternating cycle (2/27, P = 0.029). We conclude that consecutive cycles of ovarian stimulation with HMG are not detrimental and may, in fact, result in increased cycle fecundity compared to alternating stimulation cycles.",
keywords = "Consecutive cycles, Infertility, Menotrophins, Ovulation induction",
author = "Silverberg, {Kaylen M.} and Klein, {Nancy A.} and Burns, {William N.} and Schenken, {Robert S} and Olive, {David L.}",
year = "1992",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "940--944",
journal = "Human Reproduction",
issn = "0268-1161",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consecutive versus alternating cycles of ovarian stimulation using human menopausal gonadotrophin

AU - Silverberg, Kaylen M.

AU - Klein, Nancy A.

AU - Burns, William N.

AU - Schenken, Robert S

AU - Olive, David L.

PY - 1992/8

Y1 - 1992/8

N2 - Ovarian stimulation is an effective treatment for patients with ovulatory dysfunction and unexplained infertility. An initial report has suggested that consecutive cycles of ovarian stimulation can be employed without causing a diminished response in the second cycle. However, this observation has neither been confirmed nor has a regimen of consecutive stimulation cycles been compared to one of alternating stimulation cycles. Accordingly, 44 consecutive and 54 alternating cycles of stimulation were evaluated in patients (n = 42) who were treated with human menopausal gonado-trophin (HMG) alone. Human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) 10 000 IU was administered i.m. when at least one follicle exceeded 16 mm in mean diameter, and this was followed by either intercourse or intrauterine insemination. Using each patient as her own control, we were unable to demonstrate any differences in mean HMG dose requirements, endocrine parameters or follkular development on the day of HCG administration, or ovulation rates in the second consecutive cycle compared to the second alternating cycle. Clinical pregnancies resulted significantly more often in a consecutive cycle (8/22) than in an alternating cycle (2/27, P = 0.029). We conclude that consecutive cycles of ovarian stimulation with HMG are not detrimental and may, in fact, result in increased cycle fecundity compared to alternating stimulation cycles.

AB - Ovarian stimulation is an effective treatment for patients with ovulatory dysfunction and unexplained infertility. An initial report has suggested that consecutive cycles of ovarian stimulation can be employed without causing a diminished response in the second cycle. However, this observation has neither been confirmed nor has a regimen of consecutive stimulation cycles been compared to one of alternating stimulation cycles. Accordingly, 44 consecutive and 54 alternating cycles of stimulation were evaluated in patients (n = 42) who were treated with human menopausal gonado-trophin (HMG) alone. Human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) 10 000 IU was administered i.m. when at least one follicle exceeded 16 mm in mean diameter, and this was followed by either intercourse or intrauterine insemination. Using each patient as her own control, we were unable to demonstrate any differences in mean HMG dose requirements, endocrine parameters or follkular development on the day of HCG administration, or ovulation rates in the second consecutive cycle compared to the second alternating cycle. Clinical pregnancies resulted significantly more often in a consecutive cycle (8/22) than in an alternating cycle (2/27, P = 0.029). We conclude that consecutive cycles of ovarian stimulation with HMG are not detrimental and may, in fact, result in increased cycle fecundity compared to alternating stimulation cycles.

KW - Consecutive cycles

KW - Infertility

KW - Menotrophins

KW - Ovulation induction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026738371&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026738371&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1430133

AN - SCOPUS:0026738371

VL - 7

SP - 940

EP - 944

JO - Human Reproduction

JF - Human Reproduction

SN - 0268-1161

IS - 7

ER -