Cone beam CT scans with and without artefact reduction in root fracture detection of endodontically treated teeth

B. Bechara, C. Alex McMahan, William Moore, Marcel E Noujeim, F. B. Teixeira, Hassem Geha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Cone beam CT (CBCT) is used widely to depict root fracture (RF) in endodontically treated teeth. Beam hardening and other artefacts due to gutta-percha may increase the time of the diagnosis and result in an incorrect diagnosis. Two CBCT machines, ProMax® (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland) and Master 3D® (Vatech, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea), have the option of applying an artefact reduction (AR) algorithm. The aim of this study was to determine whether using an AR algorithm in two CBCT machines enhances the accuracy of detecting RFs in endodontically treated teeth. Methods: 66 roots were collected and decoronated. All roots were treated endodontically using the same technique with gutta-percha and zinc oxide cement. One-half of the roots were randomly selected and fractured using a nail that was tapped gently with a hammer until complete fracture resulted in two root fragments; the two root fragments were glued together with one layer of methyl methacrylate. The roots were placed randomly in eight prepared beef rib fragments. Results: The highest accuracy was obtained when the ProMax was used without AR. The lowest accuracy was obtained with the Master 3D when used with AR. For both machines, accuracy was significantly higher without AR than with AR. Both with and without AR, the ProMax machine was significantly more accurate than the Master 3D machine. The same rank ordering was obtained for both sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions: For both machines, AR decreased the accuracy of RF detection in endodontically treated teeth. The highest accuracy was obtained when using the ProMax without AR.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number20120245
JournalDentomaxillofacial Radiology
Volume42
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2013

Fingerprint

Nonvital Tooth
Artifacts
Gutta-Percha
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Zinc Oxide
Republic of Korea
Methacrylates
Ribs
Finland
Nails

Keywords

  • Artefact reduction
  • Cone beam computed tomography
  • Diagnosis
  • Endodontics
  • Root fracture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Cone beam CT scans with and without artefact reduction in root fracture detection of endodontically treated teeth. / Bechara, B.; McMahan, C. Alex; Moore, William; Noujeim, Marcel E; Teixeira, F. B.; Geha, Hassem.

In: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol. 42, No. 5, 20120245, 05.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bechara, B. ; McMahan, C. Alex ; Moore, William ; Noujeim, Marcel E ; Teixeira, F. B. ; Geha, Hassem. / Cone beam CT scans with and without artefact reduction in root fracture detection of endodontically treated teeth. In: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2013 ; Vol. 42, No. 5.
@article{7785eed877504831b309dd60e3a86cad,
title = "Cone beam CT scans with and without artefact reduction in root fracture detection of endodontically treated teeth",
abstract = "Objectives: Cone beam CT (CBCT) is used widely to depict root fracture (RF) in endodontically treated teeth. Beam hardening and other artefacts due to gutta-percha may increase the time of the diagnosis and result in an incorrect diagnosis. Two CBCT machines, ProMax{\circledR} (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland) and Master 3D{\circledR} (Vatech, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea), have the option of applying an artefact reduction (AR) algorithm. The aim of this study was to determine whether using an AR algorithm in two CBCT machines enhances the accuracy of detecting RFs in endodontically treated teeth. Methods: 66 roots were collected and decoronated. All roots were treated endodontically using the same technique with gutta-percha and zinc oxide cement. One-half of the roots were randomly selected and fractured using a nail that was tapped gently with a hammer until complete fracture resulted in two root fragments; the two root fragments were glued together with one layer of methyl methacrylate. The roots were placed randomly in eight prepared beef rib fragments. Results: The highest accuracy was obtained when the ProMax was used without AR. The lowest accuracy was obtained with the Master 3D when used with AR. For both machines, accuracy was significantly higher without AR than with AR. Both with and without AR, the ProMax machine was significantly more accurate than the Master 3D machine. The same rank ordering was obtained for both sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions: For both machines, AR decreased the accuracy of RF detection in endodontically treated teeth. The highest accuracy was obtained when using the ProMax without AR.",
keywords = "Artefact reduction, Cone beam computed tomography, Diagnosis, Endodontics, Root fracture",
author = "B. Bechara and McMahan, {C. Alex} and William Moore and Noujeim, {Marcel E} and Teixeira, {F. B.} and Hassem Geha",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1259/dmfr.20120245",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
journal = "Dentomaxillofacial Radiology",
issn = "0250-832X",
publisher = "British Institute of Radiology",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cone beam CT scans with and without artefact reduction in root fracture detection of endodontically treated teeth

AU - Bechara, B.

AU - McMahan, C. Alex

AU - Moore, William

AU - Noujeim, Marcel E

AU - Teixeira, F. B.

AU - Geha, Hassem

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - Objectives: Cone beam CT (CBCT) is used widely to depict root fracture (RF) in endodontically treated teeth. Beam hardening and other artefacts due to gutta-percha may increase the time of the diagnosis and result in an incorrect diagnosis. Two CBCT machines, ProMax® (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland) and Master 3D® (Vatech, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea), have the option of applying an artefact reduction (AR) algorithm. The aim of this study was to determine whether using an AR algorithm in two CBCT machines enhances the accuracy of detecting RFs in endodontically treated teeth. Methods: 66 roots were collected and decoronated. All roots were treated endodontically using the same technique with gutta-percha and zinc oxide cement. One-half of the roots were randomly selected and fractured using a nail that was tapped gently with a hammer until complete fracture resulted in two root fragments; the two root fragments were glued together with one layer of methyl methacrylate. The roots were placed randomly in eight prepared beef rib fragments. Results: The highest accuracy was obtained when the ProMax was used without AR. The lowest accuracy was obtained with the Master 3D when used with AR. For both machines, accuracy was significantly higher without AR than with AR. Both with and without AR, the ProMax machine was significantly more accurate than the Master 3D machine. The same rank ordering was obtained for both sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions: For both machines, AR decreased the accuracy of RF detection in endodontically treated teeth. The highest accuracy was obtained when using the ProMax without AR.

AB - Objectives: Cone beam CT (CBCT) is used widely to depict root fracture (RF) in endodontically treated teeth. Beam hardening and other artefacts due to gutta-percha may increase the time of the diagnosis and result in an incorrect diagnosis. Two CBCT machines, ProMax® (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland) and Master 3D® (Vatech, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea), have the option of applying an artefact reduction (AR) algorithm. The aim of this study was to determine whether using an AR algorithm in two CBCT machines enhances the accuracy of detecting RFs in endodontically treated teeth. Methods: 66 roots were collected and decoronated. All roots were treated endodontically using the same technique with gutta-percha and zinc oxide cement. One-half of the roots were randomly selected and fractured using a nail that was tapped gently with a hammer until complete fracture resulted in two root fragments; the two root fragments were glued together with one layer of methyl methacrylate. The roots were placed randomly in eight prepared beef rib fragments. Results: The highest accuracy was obtained when the ProMax was used without AR. The lowest accuracy was obtained with the Master 3D when used with AR. For both machines, accuracy was significantly higher without AR than with AR. Both with and without AR, the ProMax machine was significantly more accurate than the Master 3D machine. The same rank ordering was obtained for both sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions: For both machines, AR decreased the accuracy of RF detection in endodontically treated teeth. The highest accuracy was obtained when using the ProMax without AR.

KW - Artefact reduction

KW - Cone beam computed tomography

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Endodontics

KW - Root fracture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876788914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876788914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1259/dmfr.20120245

DO - 10.1259/dmfr.20120245

M3 - Article

VL - 42

JO - Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

JF - Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

SN - 0250-832X

IS - 5

M1 - 20120245

ER -