Conducting Quantitative Medical Education Research: From Design to Dissemination

Erika L. Abramson, Caroline R. Paul, Jean O Petershack, Janet Serwint, Janet E. Fischel, Mary Rocha, Meghan Treitz, Heather McPhillips, Tai Lockspeiser, Patricia Hicks, Linda Tewksbury, Margarita Vasquez, Daniel J. Tancredi, Su Ting T. Li

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Rigorous medical education research is critical to effectively develop and evaluate the training we provide our learners. Yet many clinical medical educators lack the training and skills needed to conduct high-quality medical education research. We offer guidance on conducting sound quantitative medical education research. Our aim is to equip readers with the key skills and strategies necessary to conduct successful research projects, highlighting new concepts and controversies in the field. We utilize Glassick's criteria for scholarship as a framework to discuss strategies to ensure that the research question of interest is worthy of further study and how to use existing literature and conceptual frameworks to strengthen a research study. Through discussions of the strengths and limitations of commonly used study designs, we expose the reader to particular nuances of these decisions in medical education research and discuss outcomes generally focused on, as well as strategies for determining the significance of consequent findings. We conclude with information on critiquing research findings and preparing results for dissemination to a broad audience. Practical planning worksheets and comprehensive tables illustrating key concepts are provided in order to guide researchers through each step of the process. Medical education research provides wonderful opportunities to improve how we teach our learners, to satisfy our own intellectual curiosity, and ultimately to enhance the care provided to patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAcademic Pediatrics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Medical Education
Biomedical Research
Research Design
Research
Exploratory Behavior
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Medical education
  • Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Abramson, E. L., Paul, C. R., Petershack, J. O., Serwint, J., Fischel, J. E., Rocha, M., ... Li, S. T. T. (Accepted/In press). Conducting Quantitative Medical Education Research: From Design to Dissemination. Academic Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2017.10.008

Conducting Quantitative Medical Education Research : From Design to Dissemination. / Abramson, Erika L.; Paul, Caroline R.; Petershack, Jean O; Serwint, Janet; Fischel, Janet E.; Rocha, Mary; Treitz, Meghan; McPhillips, Heather; Lockspeiser, Tai; Hicks, Patricia; Tewksbury, Linda; Vasquez, Margarita; Tancredi, Daniel J.; Li, Su Ting T.

In: Academic Pediatrics, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abramson, EL, Paul, CR, Petershack, JO, Serwint, J, Fischel, JE, Rocha, M, Treitz, M, McPhillips, H, Lockspeiser, T, Hicks, P, Tewksbury, L, Vasquez, M, Tancredi, DJ & Li, STT 2018, 'Conducting Quantitative Medical Education Research: From Design to Dissemination', Academic Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2017.10.008
Abramson, Erika L. ; Paul, Caroline R. ; Petershack, Jean O ; Serwint, Janet ; Fischel, Janet E. ; Rocha, Mary ; Treitz, Meghan ; McPhillips, Heather ; Lockspeiser, Tai ; Hicks, Patricia ; Tewksbury, Linda ; Vasquez, Margarita ; Tancredi, Daniel J. ; Li, Su Ting T. / Conducting Quantitative Medical Education Research : From Design to Dissemination. In: Academic Pediatrics. 2018.
@article{2b55777d75b74cb592af9f13a99ed0a1,
title = "Conducting Quantitative Medical Education Research: From Design to Dissemination",
abstract = "Rigorous medical education research is critical to effectively develop and evaluate the training we provide our learners. Yet many clinical medical educators lack the training and skills needed to conduct high-quality medical education research. We offer guidance on conducting sound quantitative medical education research. Our aim is to equip readers with the key skills and strategies necessary to conduct successful research projects, highlighting new concepts and controversies in the field. We utilize Glassick's criteria for scholarship as a framework to discuss strategies to ensure that the research question of interest is worthy of further study and how to use existing literature and conceptual frameworks to strengthen a research study. Through discussions of the strengths and limitations of commonly used study designs, we expose the reader to particular nuances of these decisions in medical education research and discuss outcomes generally focused on, as well as strategies for determining the significance of consequent findings. We conclude with information on critiquing research findings and preparing results for dissemination to a broad audience. Practical planning worksheets and comprehensive tables illustrating key concepts are provided in order to guide researchers through each step of the process. Medical education research provides wonderful opportunities to improve how we teach our learners, to satisfy our own intellectual curiosity, and ultimately to enhance the care provided to patients.",
keywords = "Medical education, Research",
author = "Abramson, {Erika L.} and Paul, {Caroline R.} and Petershack, {Jean O} and Janet Serwint and Fischel, {Janet E.} and Mary Rocha and Meghan Treitz and Heather McPhillips and Tai Lockspeiser and Patricia Hicks and Linda Tewksbury and Margarita Vasquez and Tancredi, {Daniel J.} and Li, {Su Ting T.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.acap.2017.10.008",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Academic Pediatrics",
issn = "1876-2859",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conducting Quantitative Medical Education Research

T2 - From Design to Dissemination

AU - Abramson, Erika L.

AU - Paul, Caroline R.

AU - Petershack, Jean O

AU - Serwint, Janet

AU - Fischel, Janet E.

AU - Rocha, Mary

AU - Treitz, Meghan

AU - McPhillips, Heather

AU - Lockspeiser, Tai

AU - Hicks, Patricia

AU - Tewksbury, Linda

AU - Vasquez, Margarita

AU - Tancredi, Daniel J.

AU - Li, Su Ting T.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Rigorous medical education research is critical to effectively develop and evaluate the training we provide our learners. Yet many clinical medical educators lack the training and skills needed to conduct high-quality medical education research. We offer guidance on conducting sound quantitative medical education research. Our aim is to equip readers with the key skills and strategies necessary to conduct successful research projects, highlighting new concepts and controversies in the field. We utilize Glassick's criteria for scholarship as a framework to discuss strategies to ensure that the research question of interest is worthy of further study and how to use existing literature and conceptual frameworks to strengthen a research study. Through discussions of the strengths and limitations of commonly used study designs, we expose the reader to particular nuances of these decisions in medical education research and discuss outcomes generally focused on, as well as strategies for determining the significance of consequent findings. We conclude with information on critiquing research findings and preparing results for dissemination to a broad audience. Practical planning worksheets and comprehensive tables illustrating key concepts are provided in order to guide researchers through each step of the process. Medical education research provides wonderful opportunities to improve how we teach our learners, to satisfy our own intellectual curiosity, and ultimately to enhance the care provided to patients.

AB - Rigorous medical education research is critical to effectively develop and evaluate the training we provide our learners. Yet many clinical medical educators lack the training and skills needed to conduct high-quality medical education research. We offer guidance on conducting sound quantitative medical education research. Our aim is to equip readers with the key skills and strategies necessary to conduct successful research projects, highlighting new concepts and controversies in the field. We utilize Glassick's criteria for scholarship as a framework to discuss strategies to ensure that the research question of interest is worthy of further study and how to use existing literature and conceptual frameworks to strengthen a research study. Through discussions of the strengths and limitations of commonly used study designs, we expose the reader to particular nuances of these decisions in medical education research and discuss outcomes generally focused on, as well as strategies for determining the significance of consequent findings. We conclude with information on critiquing research findings and preparing results for dissemination to a broad audience. Practical planning worksheets and comprehensive tables illustrating key concepts are provided in order to guide researchers through each step of the process. Medical education research provides wonderful opportunities to improve how we teach our learners, to satisfy our own intellectual curiosity, and ultimately to enhance the care provided to patients.

KW - Medical education

KW - Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040333575&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040333575&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.acap.2017.10.008

DO - 10.1016/j.acap.2017.10.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 29117573

AN - SCOPUS:85040333575

JO - Academic Pediatrics

JF - Academic Pediatrics

SN - 1876-2859

ER -