Computer-assisted self-assessment in persons with severe mental illness

Matthew Chinman, Alexander S. Young, Terry Schell, Joseph Hassell, Jim Mintz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: It has been difficult to improve care for severe mental illness (SMI) in usual care settings because clinical information is not reliably and efficiently managed. Methods are needed for efficiently collecting this information to evaluate and improve health care quality. Audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) can facilitate this data collection and has improved outcomes for a number of disorders, suggesting the need to test its accuracy and reliability in people with SMI. Method: Ninety patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (N = 45) or bipolar disorder (N = 45) recruited between Oct. 15, 2002, and July 1, 2003, were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 study groups and completed 2 standardized symptom surveys (Revised Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale and the symptom severity scale of the Schizophrenia Outcomes Module 2) 20 minutes apart in a crossover study design. Half of the patients first completed the scales via an in-person interview, and the other half first completed the scales via an ACASI survey self-administered through an Internet browser using a touchscreen developed to meet the cognitive needs of people with SMI. We evaluated attitudes toward ACASI, understanding of the ACASI survey, internal consistency, correlations between the ACASI and interview modes, concurrent validity, and a possible administration mode bias. Results: All ACASI and in-person interview scales had similar internal reliability, high correlations (r = 0.78-1.00), and mean scores similar enough as not to be different at p < .05. A large majority rated the ACASI survey as easier, more enjoyable, more preferable if monthly completion of a survey were required, and more private, and 97% to 99% perfectly answered questions about how to use it. Conclusion: ACASI data collection is reliable among people with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia and could be a valuable tool to improve their care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1343-1351
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Clinical Psychiatry
Volume65
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Schizophrenia
Interviews
Bipolar Disorder
Cross-Over Studies
Self-Assessment
Quality of Health Care
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Internet
Psychotic Disorders
Surveys and Questionnaires
Identification (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Computer-assisted self-assessment in persons with severe mental illness. / Chinman, Matthew; Young, Alexander S.; Schell, Terry; Hassell, Joseph; Mintz, Jim.

In: Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, Vol. 65, No. 10, 10.2004, p. 1343-1351.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chinman, Matthew ; Young, Alexander S. ; Schell, Terry ; Hassell, Joseph ; Mintz, Jim. / Computer-assisted self-assessment in persons with severe mental illness. In: Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2004 ; Vol. 65, No. 10. pp. 1343-1351.
@article{0f6b7fd47fb14922b7d045e9257928b2,
title = "Computer-assisted self-assessment in persons with severe mental illness",
abstract = "Background: It has been difficult to improve care for severe mental illness (SMI) in usual care settings because clinical information is not reliably and efficiently managed. Methods are needed for efficiently collecting this information to evaluate and improve health care quality. Audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) can facilitate this data collection and has improved outcomes for a number of disorders, suggesting the need to test its accuracy and reliability in people with SMI. Method: Ninety patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (N = 45) or bipolar disorder (N = 45) recruited between Oct. 15, 2002, and July 1, 2003, were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 study groups and completed 2 standardized symptom surveys (Revised Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale and the symptom severity scale of the Schizophrenia Outcomes Module 2) 20 minutes apart in a crossover study design. Half of the patients first completed the scales via an in-person interview, and the other half first completed the scales via an ACASI survey self-administered through an Internet browser using a touchscreen developed to meet the cognitive needs of people with SMI. We evaluated attitudes toward ACASI, understanding of the ACASI survey, internal consistency, correlations between the ACASI and interview modes, concurrent validity, and a possible administration mode bias. Results: All ACASI and in-person interview scales had similar internal reliability, high correlations (r = 0.78-1.00), and mean scores similar enough as not to be different at p < .05. A large majority rated the ACASI survey as easier, more enjoyable, more preferable if monthly completion of a survey were required, and more private, and 97{\%} to 99{\%} perfectly answered questions about how to use it. Conclusion: ACASI data collection is reliable among people with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia and could be a valuable tool to improve their care.",
author = "Matthew Chinman and Young, {Alexander S.} and Terry Schell and Joseph Hassell and Jim Mintz",
year = "2004",
month = "10",
doi = "10.4088/JCP.v65n1008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "1343--1351",
journal = "The Journal of clinical psychiatry",
issn = "0160-6689",
publisher = "Physicians Postgraduate Press Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Computer-assisted self-assessment in persons with severe mental illness

AU - Chinman, Matthew

AU - Young, Alexander S.

AU - Schell, Terry

AU - Hassell, Joseph

AU - Mintz, Jim

PY - 2004/10

Y1 - 2004/10

N2 - Background: It has been difficult to improve care for severe mental illness (SMI) in usual care settings because clinical information is not reliably and efficiently managed. Methods are needed for efficiently collecting this information to evaluate and improve health care quality. Audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) can facilitate this data collection and has improved outcomes for a number of disorders, suggesting the need to test its accuracy and reliability in people with SMI. Method: Ninety patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (N = 45) or bipolar disorder (N = 45) recruited between Oct. 15, 2002, and July 1, 2003, were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 study groups and completed 2 standardized symptom surveys (Revised Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale and the symptom severity scale of the Schizophrenia Outcomes Module 2) 20 minutes apart in a crossover study design. Half of the patients first completed the scales via an in-person interview, and the other half first completed the scales via an ACASI survey self-administered through an Internet browser using a touchscreen developed to meet the cognitive needs of people with SMI. We evaluated attitudes toward ACASI, understanding of the ACASI survey, internal consistency, correlations between the ACASI and interview modes, concurrent validity, and a possible administration mode bias. Results: All ACASI and in-person interview scales had similar internal reliability, high correlations (r = 0.78-1.00), and mean scores similar enough as not to be different at p < .05. A large majority rated the ACASI survey as easier, more enjoyable, more preferable if monthly completion of a survey were required, and more private, and 97% to 99% perfectly answered questions about how to use it. Conclusion: ACASI data collection is reliable among people with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia and could be a valuable tool to improve their care.

AB - Background: It has been difficult to improve care for severe mental illness (SMI) in usual care settings because clinical information is not reliably and efficiently managed. Methods are needed for efficiently collecting this information to evaluate and improve health care quality. Audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) can facilitate this data collection and has improved outcomes for a number of disorders, suggesting the need to test its accuracy and reliability in people with SMI. Method: Ninety patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (N = 45) or bipolar disorder (N = 45) recruited between Oct. 15, 2002, and July 1, 2003, were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 study groups and completed 2 standardized symptom surveys (Revised Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale and the symptom severity scale of the Schizophrenia Outcomes Module 2) 20 minutes apart in a crossover study design. Half of the patients first completed the scales via an in-person interview, and the other half first completed the scales via an ACASI survey self-administered through an Internet browser using a touchscreen developed to meet the cognitive needs of people with SMI. We evaluated attitudes toward ACASI, understanding of the ACASI survey, internal consistency, correlations between the ACASI and interview modes, concurrent validity, and a possible administration mode bias. Results: All ACASI and in-person interview scales had similar internal reliability, high correlations (r = 0.78-1.00), and mean scores similar enough as not to be different at p < .05. A large majority rated the ACASI survey as easier, more enjoyable, more preferable if monthly completion of a survey were required, and more private, and 97% to 99% perfectly answered questions about how to use it. Conclusion: ACASI data collection is reliable among people with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia and could be a valuable tool to improve their care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=16544367093&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=16544367093&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4088/JCP.v65n1008

DO - 10.4088/JCP.v65n1008

M3 - Article

C2 - 15491237

AN - SCOPUS:16544367093

VL - 65

SP - 1343

EP - 1351

JO - The Journal of clinical psychiatry

JF - The Journal of clinical psychiatry

SN - 0160-6689

IS - 10

ER -