Complementary and alternative medicine use by primary care patients with chronic pain

Eric I. Rosenberg, Inginia Genao, Ian Chen, Alex J. Mechaber, Jo Ann Wood, Charles J. Faselis, James Kurz, Madhu Menon, Jane E O'rorke, Mukta Panda, Mark Pasanen, Lisa Staton, Diane Calleson, Sam Cykert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. To describe the characteristics and attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among primary care patients with chronic pain disorders and to determine if CAM use is associated with better pain control. Design. Cross-sectional survey. Subjects. Four hundred sixty-three patients suffering from chronic, nonmalignant pain receiving primary care at 12 U.S. academic medical centers. Outcome Measure. Self-reported current CAM usage by patients with chronic pain disorders. Results. The survey had an 81% response rate. Fifty-two percent reported current use of CAM for relief of chronic pain. Of the patients that used CAM, 54% agreed that nontraditional remedies helped their pain and 14% indicated that their individual alternative remedy entirely relieved their pain. Vitamin and mineral supplements were the most frequently used CAM modalities. There was no association between reported use of CAM and pain severity, functional status, or perceived self-efficacy. Patients who reported having at least a high school education (odds ratio [OR]1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]1.02-1.19, P =0.016) and high levels of satisfaction with their health care (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.13-1.91, P =0.004) were significantly more likely to report using CAM. Conclusions. Complementary and alternative therapies were popular amongpatients with chronic pain disorders surveyed in academic primary care settings. When asked to choose between traditional therapies or CAM, most patients still preferred traditional therapies for pain relief. We found no association between reported CAM usage and pain severity, functional status, or self-efficacy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1065-1072
Number of pages8
JournalPain Medicine
Volume9
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Complementary Therapies
Chronic Pain
Primary Health Care
Pain
Somatoform Disorders
Self Efficacy
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals

Keywords

  • Complementary Therapies
  • Pain
  • Pain Measurement
  • Primary Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Rosenberg, E. I., Genao, I., Chen, I., Mechaber, A. J., Wood, J. A., Faselis, C. J., ... Cykert, S. (2008). Complementary and alternative medicine use by primary care patients with chronic pain. Pain Medicine, 9(8), 1065-1072. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00477.x

Complementary and alternative medicine use by primary care patients with chronic pain. / Rosenberg, Eric I.; Genao, Inginia; Chen, Ian; Mechaber, Alex J.; Wood, Jo Ann; Faselis, Charles J.; Kurz, James; Menon, Madhu; O'rorke, Jane E; Panda, Mukta; Pasanen, Mark; Staton, Lisa; Calleson, Diane; Cykert, Sam.

In: Pain Medicine, Vol. 9, No. 8, 2008, p. 1065-1072.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rosenberg, EI, Genao, I, Chen, I, Mechaber, AJ, Wood, JA, Faselis, CJ, Kurz, J, Menon, M, O'rorke, JE, Panda, M, Pasanen, M, Staton, L, Calleson, D & Cykert, S 2008, 'Complementary and alternative medicine use by primary care patients with chronic pain', Pain Medicine, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1065-1072. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00477.x
Rosenberg, Eric I. ; Genao, Inginia ; Chen, Ian ; Mechaber, Alex J. ; Wood, Jo Ann ; Faselis, Charles J. ; Kurz, James ; Menon, Madhu ; O'rorke, Jane E ; Panda, Mukta ; Pasanen, Mark ; Staton, Lisa ; Calleson, Diane ; Cykert, Sam. / Complementary and alternative medicine use by primary care patients with chronic pain. In: Pain Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 9, No. 8. pp. 1065-1072.
@article{74c0d466049444e6919acf7958ca2983,
title = "Complementary and alternative medicine use by primary care patients with chronic pain",
abstract = "Objectives. To describe the characteristics and attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among primary care patients with chronic pain disorders and to determine if CAM use is associated with better pain control. Design. Cross-sectional survey. Subjects. Four hundred sixty-three patients suffering from chronic, nonmalignant pain receiving primary care at 12 U.S. academic medical centers. Outcome Measure. Self-reported current CAM usage by patients with chronic pain disorders. Results. The survey had an 81{\%} response rate. Fifty-two percent reported current use of CAM for relief of chronic pain. Of the patients that used CAM, 54{\%} agreed that nontraditional remedies helped their pain and 14{\%} indicated that their individual alternative remedy entirely relieved their pain. Vitamin and mineral supplements were the most frequently used CAM modalities. There was no association between reported use of CAM and pain severity, functional status, or perceived self-efficacy. Patients who reported having at least a high school education (odds ratio [OR]1.1, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI]1.02-1.19, P =0.016) and high levels of satisfaction with their health care (OR 1.47, 95{\%} CI 1.13-1.91, P =0.004) were significantly more likely to report using CAM. Conclusions. Complementary and alternative therapies were popular amongpatients with chronic pain disorders surveyed in academic primary care settings. When asked to choose between traditional therapies or CAM, most patients still preferred traditional therapies for pain relief. We found no association between reported CAM usage and pain severity, functional status, or self-efficacy.",
keywords = "Complementary Therapies, Pain, Pain Measurement, Primary Health Care",
author = "Rosenberg, {Eric I.} and Inginia Genao and Ian Chen and Mechaber, {Alex J.} and Wood, {Jo Ann} and Faselis, {Charles J.} and James Kurz and Madhu Menon and O'rorke, {Jane E} and Mukta Panda and Mark Pasanen and Lisa Staton and Diane Calleson and Sam Cykert",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00477.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "1065--1072",
journal = "Pain Medicine",
issn = "1526-2375",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Complementary and alternative medicine use by primary care patients with chronic pain

AU - Rosenberg, Eric I.

AU - Genao, Inginia

AU - Chen, Ian

AU - Mechaber, Alex J.

AU - Wood, Jo Ann

AU - Faselis, Charles J.

AU - Kurz, James

AU - Menon, Madhu

AU - O'rorke, Jane E

AU - Panda, Mukta

AU - Pasanen, Mark

AU - Staton, Lisa

AU - Calleson, Diane

AU - Cykert, Sam

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Objectives. To describe the characteristics and attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among primary care patients with chronic pain disorders and to determine if CAM use is associated with better pain control. Design. Cross-sectional survey. Subjects. Four hundred sixty-three patients suffering from chronic, nonmalignant pain receiving primary care at 12 U.S. academic medical centers. Outcome Measure. Self-reported current CAM usage by patients with chronic pain disorders. Results. The survey had an 81% response rate. Fifty-two percent reported current use of CAM for relief of chronic pain. Of the patients that used CAM, 54% agreed that nontraditional remedies helped their pain and 14% indicated that their individual alternative remedy entirely relieved their pain. Vitamin and mineral supplements were the most frequently used CAM modalities. There was no association between reported use of CAM and pain severity, functional status, or perceived self-efficacy. Patients who reported having at least a high school education (odds ratio [OR]1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]1.02-1.19, P =0.016) and high levels of satisfaction with their health care (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.13-1.91, P =0.004) were significantly more likely to report using CAM. Conclusions. Complementary and alternative therapies were popular amongpatients with chronic pain disorders surveyed in academic primary care settings. When asked to choose between traditional therapies or CAM, most patients still preferred traditional therapies for pain relief. We found no association between reported CAM usage and pain severity, functional status, or self-efficacy.

AB - Objectives. To describe the characteristics and attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among primary care patients with chronic pain disorders and to determine if CAM use is associated with better pain control. Design. Cross-sectional survey. Subjects. Four hundred sixty-three patients suffering from chronic, nonmalignant pain receiving primary care at 12 U.S. academic medical centers. Outcome Measure. Self-reported current CAM usage by patients with chronic pain disorders. Results. The survey had an 81% response rate. Fifty-two percent reported current use of CAM for relief of chronic pain. Of the patients that used CAM, 54% agreed that nontraditional remedies helped their pain and 14% indicated that their individual alternative remedy entirely relieved their pain. Vitamin and mineral supplements were the most frequently used CAM modalities. There was no association between reported use of CAM and pain severity, functional status, or perceived self-efficacy. Patients who reported having at least a high school education (odds ratio [OR]1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]1.02-1.19, P =0.016) and high levels of satisfaction with their health care (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.13-1.91, P =0.004) were significantly more likely to report using CAM. Conclusions. Complementary and alternative therapies were popular amongpatients with chronic pain disorders surveyed in academic primary care settings. When asked to choose between traditional therapies or CAM, most patients still preferred traditional therapies for pain relief. We found no association between reported CAM usage and pain severity, functional status, or self-efficacy.

KW - Complementary Therapies

KW - Pain

KW - Pain Measurement

KW - Primary Health Care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56849099815&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56849099815&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00477.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00477.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 18564996

AN - SCOPUS:56849099815

VL - 9

SP - 1065

EP - 1072

JO - Pain Medicine

JF - Pain Medicine

SN - 1526-2375

IS - 8

ER -