Comparison of triazolam and pentobarbital: Performance impairment, subjective effects and abuse liability

John D Roache, R. R. Griffiths

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

81 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

On a residential research ward, the acute effects of placebo, 0.5 to 3.0 mg of triazolam (TZ) and 100 to 600 mg of pentobarbital (PTB) were examined using a within-subject, double-blind design in male volunteers with documented histories of drug abuse. Drug effects were examined through the use of subject ratings including measures of drug liking and estimates of street value, staff ratings, objective psychomotor/cognitive performance measures, subject estimates of performance, immediate and delayed recognition memory tasks and subject ratings of night-time sleep quality. Staff ratings and objective performance measures showed that TZ and PTB produced comparable dose-related impairment; TZ had a more rapid onset and a shorter duration of action than PTB. With these measures, TZ was 159 to 274 times more potent than PTB. With subject-rated measures of drug effect, sleepiness and drunkenness, in contrast, TZ produced smaller effects than PTB or was only 135 to 163 times more potent than PTB. Similarly, with subject ratings of drug liking and estimated street value, TZ produced smaller effects than PTB and was only 91 to 122 times more potent than PTB. Other results showed that TZ produced greater amnestic effects than PTB and subjects under the influence TZ more consistently underestimated the degree of their impairment. Overall, these results suggest that TZ has a lower liability for abuse (likelihood) than PTB, but a greater liability of abuse (hazard) with regard to performance impairment on certain kinds of tasks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)120-133
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Volume234
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1985
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Triazolam
Pentobarbital
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Repression (Psychology)
Psychomotor Performance
Alcoholic Intoxication
Placebo Effect
Substance-Related Disorders
Volunteers
Sleep

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology

Cite this

@article{c4be9c98a863493db41d6d4884caa48a,
title = "Comparison of triazolam and pentobarbital: Performance impairment, subjective effects and abuse liability",
abstract = "On a residential research ward, the acute effects of placebo, 0.5 to 3.0 mg of triazolam (TZ) and 100 to 600 mg of pentobarbital (PTB) were examined using a within-subject, double-blind design in male volunteers with documented histories of drug abuse. Drug effects were examined through the use of subject ratings including measures of drug liking and estimates of street value, staff ratings, objective psychomotor/cognitive performance measures, subject estimates of performance, immediate and delayed recognition memory tasks and subject ratings of night-time sleep quality. Staff ratings and objective performance measures showed that TZ and PTB produced comparable dose-related impairment; TZ had a more rapid onset and a shorter duration of action than PTB. With these measures, TZ was 159 to 274 times more potent than PTB. With subject-rated measures of drug effect, sleepiness and drunkenness, in contrast, TZ produced smaller effects than PTB or was only 135 to 163 times more potent than PTB. Similarly, with subject ratings of drug liking and estimated street value, TZ produced smaller effects than PTB and was only 91 to 122 times more potent than PTB. Other results showed that TZ produced greater amnestic effects than PTB and subjects under the influence TZ more consistently underestimated the degree of their impairment. Overall, these results suggest that TZ has a lower liability for abuse (likelihood) than PTB, but a greater liability of abuse (hazard) with regard to performance impairment on certain kinds of tasks.",
author = "Roache, {John D} and Griffiths, {R. R.}",
year = "1985",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "234",
pages = "120--133",
journal = "Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics",
issn = "0022-3565",
publisher = "American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of triazolam and pentobarbital

T2 - Performance impairment, subjective effects and abuse liability

AU - Roache, John D

AU - Griffiths, R. R.

PY - 1985

Y1 - 1985

N2 - On a residential research ward, the acute effects of placebo, 0.5 to 3.0 mg of triazolam (TZ) and 100 to 600 mg of pentobarbital (PTB) were examined using a within-subject, double-blind design in male volunteers with documented histories of drug abuse. Drug effects were examined through the use of subject ratings including measures of drug liking and estimates of street value, staff ratings, objective psychomotor/cognitive performance measures, subject estimates of performance, immediate and delayed recognition memory tasks and subject ratings of night-time sleep quality. Staff ratings and objective performance measures showed that TZ and PTB produced comparable dose-related impairment; TZ had a more rapid onset and a shorter duration of action than PTB. With these measures, TZ was 159 to 274 times more potent than PTB. With subject-rated measures of drug effect, sleepiness and drunkenness, in contrast, TZ produced smaller effects than PTB or was only 135 to 163 times more potent than PTB. Similarly, with subject ratings of drug liking and estimated street value, TZ produced smaller effects than PTB and was only 91 to 122 times more potent than PTB. Other results showed that TZ produced greater amnestic effects than PTB and subjects under the influence TZ more consistently underestimated the degree of their impairment. Overall, these results suggest that TZ has a lower liability for abuse (likelihood) than PTB, but a greater liability of abuse (hazard) with regard to performance impairment on certain kinds of tasks.

AB - On a residential research ward, the acute effects of placebo, 0.5 to 3.0 mg of triazolam (TZ) and 100 to 600 mg of pentobarbital (PTB) were examined using a within-subject, double-blind design in male volunteers with documented histories of drug abuse. Drug effects were examined through the use of subject ratings including measures of drug liking and estimates of street value, staff ratings, objective psychomotor/cognitive performance measures, subject estimates of performance, immediate and delayed recognition memory tasks and subject ratings of night-time sleep quality. Staff ratings and objective performance measures showed that TZ and PTB produced comparable dose-related impairment; TZ had a more rapid onset and a shorter duration of action than PTB. With these measures, TZ was 159 to 274 times more potent than PTB. With subject-rated measures of drug effect, sleepiness and drunkenness, in contrast, TZ produced smaller effects than PTB or was only 135 to 163 times more potent than PTB. Similarly, with subject ratings of drug liking and estimated street value, TZ produced smaller effects than PTB and was only 91 to 122 times more potent than PTB. Other results showed that TZ produced greater amnestic effects than PTB and subjects under the influence TZ more consistently underestimated the degree of their impairment. Overall, these results suggest that TZ has a lower liability for abuse (likelihood) than PTB, but a greater liability of abuse (hazard) with regard to performance impairment on certain kinds of tasks.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021810647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021810647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2861282

AN - SCOPUS:0021810647

VL - 234

SP - 120

EP - 133

JO - Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

JF - Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

SN - 0022-3565

IS - 1

ER -