Comparison of the helical tomotherapy against the multileaf collimator-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy and 3D conformal radiation modalities in lung cancer radiotherapy

P. Mavroidis, C. Shi, G. A. Plataniotis, M. G. Delichas, B. Costa Ferreira, S. Rodriguez, B. K. Lind, Nikos Papanikolaou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy and the two different forms of IMRT in lung cancer radiotherapy. Methods: Cases of four lung cancer patients were investigated by developing a 3D conformal treatment plan, a linac MLC-based step-and-shoot IMRT plan and an HT plan for each case. With the use of the complication-free tumour control probability (P+) index and the uniform dose concept as the common prescription point of the plans, the different treatment plans were compared based on radiobiological measures. Results: The applied plan evaluation method shows the MLC-based IMRT and the HT treatment plans are almost equivalent over the clinically useful dose prescription range; however, the 3D conformal plan inferior. At the optimal dose levels, the 3D conformal treatment plans give an average P+ of 48.1% for a effective uniform dose to the internal target volume (ITV) of 62.4 Gy, whereas the corresponding MLC-based IMRT treatment plans are more effective by an average ΔP+ of 27.0% for a Δ effective uniform dose of 16.3 Gy. Similarly, the HT treatment plans are more effective than the 3D-conformal plans by an average ΔP+ of 23.8% for a Δ effective uniform dose of 11.6 Gy. Conclusion: A radiobiological treatment plan evaluation can provide a closer association of the delivered treatment with the clinical outcome by taking into account the dose-response relations of the irradiated tumours and normal tissues. The use of P - effective uniform dose diagrams can complement the traditional tools of evaluation to compare and effectively evaluate different treatment plans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)161-172
Number of pages12
JournalBritish Journal of Radiology
Volume84
Issue number998
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2011

Fingerprint

Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Lung Neoplasms
Radiotherapy
Radiation
Therapeutics
Prescriptions
Conformal Radiotherapy
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Comparison of the helical tomotherapy against the multileaf collimator-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy and 3D conformal radiation modalities in lung cancer radiotherapy. / Mavroidis, P.; Shi, C.; Plataniotis, G. A.; Delichas, M. G.; Costa Ferreira, B.; Rodriguez, S.; Lind, B. K.; Papanikolaou, Nikos.

In: British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 84, No. 998, 02.2011, p. 161-172.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mavroidis, P. ; Shi, C. ; Plataniotis, G. A. ; Delichas, M. G. ; Costa Ferreira, B. ; Rodriguez, S. ; Lind, B. K. ; Papanikolaou, Nikos. / Comparison of the helical tomotherapy against the multileaf collimator-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy and 3D conformal radiation modalities in lung cancer radiotherapy. In: British Journal of Radiology. 2011 ; Vol. 84, No. 998. pp. 161-172.
@article{c966c673d5df446496492452dfcce937,
title = "Comparison of the helical tomotherapy against the multileaf collimator-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy and 3D conformal radiation modalities in lung cancer radiotherapy",
abstract = "Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy and the two different forms of IMRT in lung cancer radiotherapy. Methods: Cases of four lung cancer patients were investigated by developing a 3D conformal treatment plan, a linac MLC-based step-and-shoot IMRT plan and an HT plan for each case. With the use of the complication-free tumour control probability (P+) index and the uniform dose concept as the common prescription point of the plans, the different treatment plans were compared based on radiobiological measures. Results: The applied plan evaluation method shows the MLC-based IMRT and the HT treatment plans are almost equivalent over the clinically useful dose prescription range; however, the 3D conformal plan inferior. At the optimal dose levels, the 3D conformal treatment plans give an average P+ of 48.1{\%} for a effective uniform dose to the internal target volume (ITV) of 62.4 Gy, whereas the corresponding MLC-based IMRT treatment plans are more effective by an average ΔP+ of 27.0{\%} for a Δ effective uniform dose of 16.3 Gy. Similarly, the HT treatment plans are more effective than the 3D-conformal plans by an average ΔP+ of 23.8{\%} for a Δ effective uniform dose of 11.6 Gy. Conclusion: A radiobiological treatment plan evaluation can provide a closer association of the delivered treatment with the clinical outcome by taking into account the dose-response relations of the irradiated tumours and normal tissues. The use of P - effective uniform dose diagrams can complement the traditional tools of evaluation to compare and effectively evaluate different treatment plans.",
author = "P. Mavroidis and C. Shi and Plataniotis, {G. A.} and Delichas, {M. G.} and {Costa Ferreira}, B. and S. Rodriguez and Lind, {B. K.} and Nikos Papanikolaou",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1259/bjr/89275085",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "161--172",
journal = "British Journal of Radiology",
issn = "0007-1285",
publisher = "British Institute of Radiology",
number = "998",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the helical tomotherapy against the multileaf collimator-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy and 3D conformal radiation modalities in lung cancer radiotherapy

AU - Mavroidis, P.

AU - Shi, C.

AU - Plataniotis, G. A.

AU - Delichas, M. G.

AU - Costa Ferreira, B.

AU - Rodriguez, S.

AU - Lind, B. K.

AU - Papanikolaou, Nikos

PY - 2011/2

Y1 - 2011/2

N2 - Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy and the two different forms of IMRT in lung cancer radiotherapy. Methods: Cases of four lung cancer patients were investigated by developing a 3D conformal treatment plan, a linac MLC-based step-and-shoot IMRT plan and an HT plan for each case. With the use of the complication-free tumour control probability (P+) index and the uniform dose concept as the common prescription point of the plans, the different treatment plans were compared based on radiobiological measures. Results: The applied plan evaluation method shows the MLC-based IMRT and the HT treatment plans are almost equivalent over the clinically useful dose prescription range; however, the 3D conformal plan inferior. At the optimal dose levels, the 3D conformal treatment plans give an average P+ of 48.1% for a effective uniform dose to the internal target volume (ITV) of 62.4 Gy, whereas the corresponding MLC-based IMRT treatment plans are more effective by an average ΔP+ of 27.0% for a Δ effective uniform dose of 16.3 Gy. Similarly, the HT treatment plans are more effective than the 3D-conformal plans by an average ΔP+ of 23.8% for a Δ effective uniform dose of 11.6 Gy. Conclusion: A radiobiological treatment plan evaluation can provide a closer association of the delivered treatment with the clinical outcome by taking into account the dose-response relations of the irradiated tumours and normal tissues. The use of P - effective uniform dose diagrams can complement the traditional tools of evaluation to compare and effectively evaluate different treatment plans.

AB - Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy and the two different forms of IMRT in lung cancer radiotherapy. Methods: Cases of four lung cancer patients were investigated by developing a 3D conformal treatment plan, a linac MLC-based step-and-shoot IMRT plan and an HT plan for each case. With the use of the complication-free tumour control probability (P+) index and the uniform dose concept as the common prescription point of the plans, the different treatment plans were compared based on radiobiological measures. Results: The applied plan evaluation method shows the MLC-based IMRT and the HT treatment plans are almost equivalent over the clinically useful dose prescription range; however, the 3D conformal plan inferior. At the optimal dose levels, the 3D conformal treatment plans give an average P+ of 48.1% for a effective uniform dose to the internal target volume (ITV) of 62.4 Gy, whereas the corresponding MLC-based IMRT treatment plans are more effective by an average ΔP+ of 27.0% for a Δ effective uniform dose of 16.3 Gy. Similarly, the HT treatment plans are more effective than the 3D-conformal plans by an average ΔP+ of 23.8% for a Δ effective uniform dose of 11.6 Gy. Conclusion: A radiobiological treatment plan evaluation can provide a closer association of the delivered treatment with the clinical outcome by taking into account the dose-response relations of the irradiated tumours and normal tissues. The use of P - effective uniform dose diagrams can complement the traditional tools of evaluation to compare and effectively evaluate different treatment plans.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78751692666&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78751692666&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1259/bjr/89275085

DO - 10.1259/bjr/89275085

M3 - Article

VL - 84

SP - 161

EP - 172

JO - British Journal of Radiology

JF - British Journal of Radiology

SN - 0007-1285

IS - 998

ER -