Comparison of tests for detecting leaks in the low-pressure system of anesthesia gas machines

Jeffrey A. Myers, Michael L. Good, J. Jeffrey Andrews

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Small leaks in the low-pressure system (LPS) of the anesthesia gas machine can cause hypoxia or patient awareness. We sought to determine the relative sensitivities of the various tests recommended for detecting LPS leaks before anesthesia. Special adapters were fashioned to create leaks of six different sizes in the LPS that were equivalent to the following: a single 25-, 22-, 20-, or 15-gauge needle, two 15-gauge needles, or a 2.5-mm endotracheal tube connector. With each leak condition, live different leak tests were performed on three each of the following machines: Ohmeda Modulus I(TM), Ohmeda Modulus II(®)-Plus, and North American Drager Narkomed (2A, 3 and 4), for a total of 54 leaks to be detected for each leak test (3 x 3 x 6). The number of leaks detected with each test was compared by Fisher's exact test, P < 0.05 being considered significant. Only the negative pressure leak test detected all 54 leaks, a significant difference from the positive pressure test, which detected the least number of leaks, 28 (P < 0.05). Some leak tests are more suitable for specific anesthesia machines. Adoption of the negative pressure test as a universal LPS leak test may prevent the risks associated with using the wrong test for the particular anesthesia machine: hypoxic gas or patient awareness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)179-184
Number of pages6
JournalAnesthesia and Analgesia
Volume84
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Anesthesia
Gases
Pressure
Needles

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Comparison of tests for detecting leaks in the low-pressure system of anesthesia gas machines. / Myers, Jeffrey A.; Good, Michael L.; Andrews, J. Jeffrey.

In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 84, No. 1, 1997, p. 179-184.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Myers, Jeffrey A. ; Good, Michael L. ; Andrews, J. Jeffrey. / Comparison of tests for detecting leaks in the low-pressure system of anesthesia gas machines. In: Anesthesia and Analgesia. 1997 ; Vol. 84, No. 1. pp. 179-184.
@article{2ebc31d4b8b34f928091f7cdb4c05e1a,
title = "Comparison of tests for detecting leaks in the low-pressure system of anesthesia gas machines",
abstract = "Small leaks in the low-pressure system (LPS) of the anesthesia gas machine can cause hypoxia or patient awareness. We sought to determine the relative sensitivities of the various tests recommended for detecting LPS leaks before anesthesia. Special adapters were fashioned to create leaks of six different sizes in the LPS that were equivalent to the following: a single 25-, 22-, 20-, or 15-gauge needle, two 15-gauge needles, or a 2.5-mm endotracheal tube connector. With each leak condition, live different leak tests were performed on three each of the following machines: Ohmeda Modulus I(TM), Ohmeda Modulus II({\circledR})-Plus, and North American Drager Narkomed (2A, 3 and 4), for a total of 54 leaks to be detected for each leak test (3 x 3 x 6). The number of leaks detected with each test was compared by Fisher's exact test, P < 0.05 being considered significant. Only the negative pressure leak test detected all 54 leaks, a significant difference from the positive pressure test, which detected the least number of leaks, 28 (P < 0.05). Some leak tests are more suitable for specific anesthesia machines. Adoption of the negative pressure test as a universal LPS leak test may prevent the risks associated with using the wrong test for the particular anesthesia machine: hypoxic gas or patient awareness.",
author = "Myers, {Jeffrey A.} and Good, {Michael L.} and Andrews, {J. Jeffrey}",
year = "1997",
doi = "10.1097/00000539-199701000-00032",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "179--184",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of tests for detecting leaks in the low-pressure system of anesthesia gas machines

AU - Myers, Jeffrey A.

AU - Good, Michael L.

AU - Andrews, J. Jeffrey

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Small leaks in the low-pressure system (LPS) of the anesthesia gas machine can cause hypoxia or patient awareness. We sought to determine the relative sensitivities of the various tests recommended for detecting LPS leaks before anesthesia. Special adapters were fashioned to create leaks of six different sizes in the LPS that were equivalent to the following: a single 25-, 22-, 20-, or 15-gauge needle, two 15-gauge needles, or a 2.5-mm endotracheal tube connector. With each leak condition, live different leak tests were performed on three each of the following machines: Ohmeda Modulus I(TM), Ohmeda Modulus II(®)-Plus, and North American Drager Narkomed (2A, 3 and 4), for a total of 54 leaks to be detected for each leak test (3 x 3 x 6). The number of leaks detected with each test was compared by Fisher's exact test, P < 0.05 being considered significant. Only the negative pressure leak test detected all 54 leaks, a significant difference from the positive pressure test, which detected the least number of leaks, 28 (P < 0.05). Some leak tests are more suitable for specific anesthesia machines. Adoption of the negative pressure test as a universal LPS leak test may prevent the risks associated with using the wrong test for the particular anesthesia machine: hypoxic gas or patient awareness.

AB - Small leaks in the low-pressure system (LPS) of the anesthesia gas machine can cause hypoxia or patient awareness. We sought to determine the relative sensitivities of the various tests recommended for detecting LPS leaks before anesthesia. Special adapters were fashioned to create leaks of six different sizes in the LPS that were equivalent to the following: a single 25-, 22-, 20-, or 15-gauge needle, two 15-gauge needles, or a 2.5-mm endotracheal tube connector. With each leak condition, live different leak tests were performed on three each of the following machines: Ohmeda Modulus I(TM), Ohmeda Modulus II(®)-Plus, and North American Drager Narkomed (2A, 3 and 4), for a total of 54 leaks to be detected for each leak test (3 x 3 x 6). The number of leaks detected with each test was compared by Fisher's exact test, P < 0.05 being considered significant. Only the negative pressure leak test detected all 54 leaks, a significant difference from the positive pressure test, which detected the least number of leaks, 28 (P < 0.05). Some leak tests are more suitable for specific anesthesia machines. Adoption of the negative pressure test as a universal LPS leak test may prevent the risks associated with using the wrong test for the particular anesthesia machine: hypoxic gas or patient awareness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031033789&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031033789&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00000539-199701000-00032

DO - 10.1097/00000539-199701000-00032

M3 - Article

C2 - 8989021

AN - SCOPUS:0031033789

VL - 84

SP - 179

EP - 184

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

IS - 1

ER -