Comparison of small-intestinal submucosa and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene as a vascular conduit in the presence of gram-positive contamination

Daniel H. Shell IV, Martin A. Croce, Catherine Cagiannos, T. Wright Jernigan, Norma Edwards, Timothy C. Fabian, David V. Feliciano, Timothy C. Flynn, Selwyn M. Vickers, Basil A. Pruitt, William C. Lineaweaver, Adrian Barbul

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

54 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: As a vascular conduit, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) is susceptible to graft infection with Gram-positive organisms. Biomaterials, such as porcine small-intestinal submucosa (SIS), have been successfully used clinically as tissue substitutes outside the vascular arena. Summary Background Data: In the present study, we compared a small-diameter conduit of SIS to ePTFE in the presence of Gram-positive contamination to evaluate infection resistance, incorporation and remodeling, morphometry, graft patency, and neointimal hyperplasia (NH) development. Methods: Adult male mongrel pigs were randomized to receive either SIS or ePTFE (3-cm length, 6-mm diameter) and further randomized to 1 of 3 groups: Control (no graft inoculation), Staphylococcus aureus, or mucin-producing S epidermidis (each graft inoculation with 108 colonies/mL). Pressure measurements were obtained proximal and distal to the graft to create the iliac/aorta pressure ratio. Morphometric analysis of the neointima and histopathologic examinations was performed. Other outcomes included weekly WBC counts, graft incorporation, and quantitative culture of explanted grafts. Results: Eighteen animals were randomized. All grafts were patent throughout the 6-week study period. Infected SIS grafts had less NH and little change in their iliac/aorta indices compared with infected ePTFE grafts. Quantitative cultures at euthanasia demonstrated no growth in either SIS group compared with 1.7 × 104 colonies for ePTFE S aureus and 6 × 102 for ePTFE S epi (each P < 0.001). All SIS grafts were incorporated. Histology demonstrated remodeling into host artery with smooth muscle and capillary ingrowth in all SIS groups. Scanning electron micrography illustrated smooth and complete endothelialization of all SIS grafts. Conclusions: Compared with ePTFE, SIS induces host tissue remodeling, exhibits a decreased neointimal response to infection, and is resistant to bacterial colonization. SIS may provide a superior alternative to ePTFE as a vascular conduit for peripheral vascular surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)995-1004
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of surgery
Volume241
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of small-intestinal submucosa and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene as a vascular conduit in the presence of gram-positive contamination'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this