Comparison of pre- and postcontrast CT in hepatic masses

L. L. Berland, T. L. Lawson, W. D. Foley, B. L. Melrose, Kedar N Chintapalli, A. J. Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)853-858
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume138
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1982
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tomography
Liver
Contrast Media
Intravenous Administration
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Berland, L. L., Lawson, T. L., Foley, W. D., Melrose, B. L., Chintapalli, K. N., & Taylor, A. J. (1982). Comparison of pre- and postcontrast CT in hepatic masses. American Journal of Roentgenology, 138(5), 853-858.

Comparison of pre- and postcontrast CT in hepatic masses. / Berland, L. L.; Lawson, T. L.; Foley, W. D.; Melrose, B. L.; Chintapalli, Kedar N; Taylor, A. J.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 138, No. 5, 1982, p. 853-858.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Berland, LL, Lawson, TL, Foley, WD, Melrose, BL, Chintapalli, KN & Taylor, AJ 1982, 'Comparison of pre- and postcontrast CT in hepatic masses', American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 138, no. 5, pp. 853-858.
Berland LL, Lawson TL, Foley WD, Melrose BL, Chintapalli KN, Taylor AJ. Comparison of pre- and postcontrast CT in hepatic masses. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1982;138(5):853-858.
Berland, L. L. ; Lawson, T. L. ; Foley, W. D. ; Melrose, B. L. ; Chintapalli, Kedar N ; Taylor, A. J. / Comparison of pre- and postcontrast CT in hepatic masses. In: American Journal of Roentgenology. 1982 ; Vol. 138, No. 5. pp. 853-858.
@article{51e771744bd14e4a9f151b241dc6151c,
title = "Comparison of pre- and postcontrast CT in hepatic masses",
abstract = "A comparison of hepatic computed tomography (CT) before and after administering intravenous contrast material was performed 85 times on 81 patients suspected of having hepatic mass lesions. Both pre- and postcontrast computed tomography were sensitive and specific in over 88{\%} of cases, with no statistical differences in accuracy between the techniques. However, postcontrast scans were generally preferred because of increased diagnostic confidence and improved characterization of associated abnormalities. The recent advent of rapid sequential scanning after intravenous administration of a large volume of contrast material seems to further improve diagnostic confidence. When high-resolution CT equipment is used, postcontrast CT alone is the preferred method for CT evaluation of patients with suspected liver lesions.",
author = "Berland, {L. L.} and Lawson, {T. L.} and Foley, {W. D.} and Melrose, {B. L.} and Chintapalli, {Kedar N} and Taylor, {A. J.}",
year = "1982",
language = "English",
volume = "138",
pages = "853--858",
journal = "AJR. American journal of roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of pre- and postcontrast CT in hepatic masses

AU - Berland, L. L.

AU - Lawson, T. L.

AU - Foley, W. D.

AU - Melrose, B. L.

AU - Chintapalli, Kedar N

AU - Taylor, A. J.

PY - 1982

Y1 - 1982

N2 - A comparison of hepatic computed tomography (CT) before and after administering intravenous contrast material was performed 85 times on 81 patients suspected of having hepatic mass lesions. Both pre- and postcontrast computed tomography were sensitive and specific in over 88% of cases, with no statistical differences in accuracy between the techniques. However, postcontrast scans were generally preferred because of increased diagnostic confidence and improved characterization of associated abnormalities. The recent advent of rapid sequential scanning after intravenous administration of a large volume of contrast material seems to further improve diagnostic confidence. When high-resolution CT equipment is used, postcontrast CT alone is the preferred method for CT evaluation of patients with suspected liver lesions.

AB - A comparison of hepatic computed tomography (CT) before and after administering intravenous contrast material was performed 85 times on 81 patients suspected of having hepatic mass lesions. Both pre- and postcontrast computed tomography were sensitive and specific in over 88% of cases, with no statistical differences in accuracy between the techniques. However, postcontrast scans were generally preferred because of increased diagnostic confidence and improved characterization of associated abnormalities. The recent advent of rapid sequential scanning after intravenous administration of a large volume of contrast material seems to further improve diagnostic confidence. When high-resolution CT equipment is used, postcontrast CT alone is the preferred method for CT evaluation of patients with suspected liver lesions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020047955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020047955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 6282094

AN - SCOPUS:0020047955

VL - 138

SP - 853

EP - 858

JO - AJR. American journal of roentgenology

JF - AJR. American journal of roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 5

ER -