Abstract
Most comparisons between dental radiographs and dental xeroradiographs to date have been qualitative. Because the processing techniques and receptor materials are so dissimilar, a simple, objective comparison has been difficult. This report outlines a quantitative comparison technique that is easily reproduced.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 92-95 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology |
| Volume | 62 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 1986 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
- Dentistry(all)
Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of conventional dental radiographs and xeroradiographs using perceptibility curves'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Cite this
Miles, D. A., McDavid, W. D., Welander, U., & Hockett, S. (1986). Comparison of conventional dental radiographs and xeroradiographs using perceptibility curves. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 62(1), 92-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(86)90078-2