Comparison of conventional dental radiographs and xeroradiographs using perceptibility curves

Dale A. Miles; William D. McDavid; Ulf Welander; Steven Hockett

doi:10.1016/0030-4220(86)90078-2

Comparison of conventional dental radiographs and xeroradiographs using perceptibility curves

Dale A. Miles, William D. McDavid, Ulf Welander, Steven Hockett

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Most comparisons between dental radiographs and dental xeroradiographs to date have been qualitative. Because the processing techniques and receptor materials are so dissimilar, a simple, objective comparison has been difficult. This report outlines a quantitative comparison technique that is easily reproduced.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	92-95
Number of pages	4
Journal	Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology
Volume	62
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(86)90078-2
State	Published - Jul 1986
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Dentistry(all)

Access to Document

10.1016/0030-4220(86)90078-2

Cite this

@article{6357f79b7167426f9ed43d92259d1f0d,

title = "Comparison of conventional dental radiographs and xeroradiographs using perceptibility curves",

abstract = "Most comparisons between dental radiographs and dental xeroradiographs to date have been qualitative. Because the processing techniques and receptor materials are so dissimilar, a simple, objective comparison has been difficult. This report outlines a quantitative comparison technique that is easily reproduced.",

author = "Miles, {Dale A.} and McDavid, {William D.} and Ulf Welander and Steven Hockett",

year = "1986",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1016/0030-4220(86)90078-2",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "62",

pages = "92--95",

journal = "Oral Surgery Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology",

issn = "2212-4403",

publisher = "Elsevier USA",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of conventional dental radiographs and xeroradiographs using perceptibility curves

AU - Miles, Dale A.

AU - McDavid, William D.

AU - Welander, Ulf

AU - Hockett, Steven

PY - 1986/7

Y1 - 1986/7

N2 - Most comparisons between dental radiographs and dental xeroradiographs to date have been qualitative. Because the processing techniques and receptor materials are so dissimilar, a simple, objective comparison has been difficult. This report outlines a quantitative comparison technique that is easily reproduced.

AB - Most comparisons between dental radiographs and dental xeroradiographs to date have been qualitative. Because the processing techniques and receptor materials are so dissimilar, a simple, objective comparison has been difficult. This report outlines a quantitative comparison technique that is easily reproduced.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022747048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022747048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0030-4220(86)90078-2

DO - 10.1016/0030-4220(86)90078-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 3460014

AN - SCOPUS:0022747048

VL - 62

SP - 92

EP - 95

JO - Oral Surgery Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology

JF - Oral Surgery Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology

SN - 2212-4403

IS - 1

ER -

Comparison of conventional dental radiographs and xeroradiographs using perceptibility curves

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this