Abstract
Research education and training in Translational Science develops and sustains a workforce to efficiently advance studies designed to improve human health. We evaluated the effectiveness of a Translational Science Training (TST) TL1 Program. Participants had significantly better publications/year, citations/year, h-index, and m-quotient than nonparticipants. Female and male participants, and participants from underrepresented and well-represented backgrounds, performed similarly on all bibliometric assessments. Finally, TST/TL1 Program participants outperformed students from other PhD programs at our institution. This analysis suggests that the TST/TL1 Program has been effective for participants, including those who are female and from underrepresented backgrounds.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | e12 |
| Journal | Journal of Clinical and Translational Science |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 1 2023 |
Keywords
- NIH training program
- T32
- TL1
- Translational science
- bibliometrics
- comparative-effectiveness
- disparities
- sex differences
- underrepresented backgrounds
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of bibliometrics for predoctoral Translational Science Training (TST) TL1 Program participants and nonparticipants, male and female participants, and participants from underrepresented and well-represented backgrounds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS