Comparison of bibliometrics for predoctoral Translational Science Training (TST) TL1 Program participants and nonparticipants, male and female participants, and participants from underrepresented and well-represented backgrounds

Christopher R. Frei, Yong Hee P. Chun, Linda M. Mcmanus, Julie Barker, Amanda M. Moore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Research education and training in Translational Science develops and sustains a workforce to efficiently advance studies designed to improve human health. We evaluated the effectiveness of a Translational Science Training (TST) TL1 Program. Participants had significantly better publications/year, citations/year, h-index, and m-quotient than nonparticipants. Female and male participants, and participants from underrepresented and well-represented backgrounds, performed similarly on all bibliometric assessments. Finally, TST/TL1 Program participants outperformed students from other PhD programs at our institution. This analysis suggests that the TST/TL1 Program has been effective for participants, including those who are female and from underrepresented backgrounds.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere12
JournalJournal of Clinical and Translational Science
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2023

Keywords

  • NIH training program
  • T32
  • TL1
  • Translational science
  • bibliometrics
  • comparative-effectiveness
  • disparities
  • sex differences
  • underrepresented backgrounds

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of bibliometrics for predoctoral Translational Science Training (TST) TL1 Program participants and nonparticipants, male and female participants, and participants from underrepresented and well-represented backgrounds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this