Comparing the efficacy of interventions that use environmental supports to improve outcomes in patients with schizophrenia

Dawn I Velligan, Pamela M. Diamond, Natalie J Maples, Jim Mintz, Xueying Li, David C. Glahn, Alexander L Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examined the efficacy of 2 treatments using environmental supports (e.g. signs, alarms, pill containers, checklists) to improve functional outcomes in individuals with schizophrenia. 120 participants were randomized into one of 3 treatment groups 1) Cognitive Adaptation Training (CAT; supports customized to individual cognitive impairments and behaviors and maintained on weekly home visits 2) Generic Environmental Supports (GES; a generic set of supports given to patients at a routine clinic visit and replaced on a monthly basis) and 3) treatment as usual (TAU). Functional outcomes, positive symptoms and motivation were assessed at baseline, 3, 6, 9, 18 and 24months. After 9 months of intensive treatment with CAT, visits were decreased from weekly to monthly to examine whether treatment gains could be maintained. Results of a mixed effects regression model with repeated measures indicated a significant main effect of group (CAT > GES > TAU) with non-significant time and group by time interactions. Post-hoc analyses indicated that while individuals in CAT remained significantly better than those in TAU when treatment frequency was reduced, gains in CAT decreased to the level of those seen in GES. While group differences for positive symptoms were not significant, motivation improved in CAT and GES relative to TAU. The highest intensity treatment produced the best outcomes with respect to functioning. However, some improvements were seen with a relatively inexpensive, clinic-based treatment using a package of generic environmental supports.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)312-319
Number of pages8
JournalSchizophrenia Research
Volume102
Issue number1-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2008

Fingerprint

Schizophrenia
Therapeutics
Motivation
Training Support
House Calls
Ambulatory Care
Checklist

Keywords

  • Cognitive Adaptation Training
  • Environmental supports
  • Functional outcomes
  • Schizophrenia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Neurology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Comparing the efficacy of interventions that use environmental supports to improve outcomes in patients with schizophrenia. / Velligan, Dawn I; Diamond, Pamela M.; Maples, Natalie J; Mintz, Jim; Li, Xueying; Glahn, David C.; Miller, Alexander L.

In: Schizophrenia Research, Vol. 102, No. 1-3, 07.2008, p. 312-319.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Velligan, Dawn I ; Diamond, Pamela M. ; Maples, Natalie J ; Mintz, Jim ; Li, Xueying ; Glahn, David C. ; Miller, Alexander L. / Comparing the efficacy of interventions that use environmental supports to improve outcomes in patients with schizophrenia. In: Schizophrenia Research. 2008 ; Vol. 102, No. 1-3. pp. 312-319.
@article{15666993acb44c1ab9a0dda6482c149b,
title = "Comparing the efficacy of interventions that use environmental supports to improve outcomes in patients with schizophrenia",
abstract = "We examined the efficacy of 2 treatments using environmental supports (e.g. signs, alarms, pill containers, checklists) to improve functional outcomes in individuals with schizophrenia. 120 participants were randomized into one of 3 treatment groups 1) Cognitive Adaptation Training (CAT; supports customized to individual cognitive impairments and behaviors and maintained on weekly home visits 2) Generic Environmental Supports (GES; a generic set of supports given to patients at a routine clinic visit and replaced on a monthly basis) and 3) treatment as usual (TAU). Functional outcomes, positive symptoms and motivation were assessed at baseline, 3, 6, 9, 18 and 24months. After 9 months of intensive treatment with CAT, visits were decreased from weekly to monthly to examine whether treatment gains could be maintained. Results of a mixed effects regression model with repeated measures indicated a significant main effect of group (CAT > GES > TAU) with non-significant time and group by time interactions. Post-hoc analyses indicated that while individuals in CAT remained significantly better than those in TAU when treatment frequency was reduced, gains in CAT decreased to the level of those seen in GES. While group differences for positive symptoms were not significant, motivation improved in CAT and GES relative to TAU. The highest intensity treatment produced the best outcomes with respect to functioning. However, some improvements were seen with a relatively inexpensive, clinic-based treatment using a package of generic environmental supports.",
keywords = "Cognitive Adaptation Training, Environmental supports, Functional outcomes, Schizophrenia",
author = "Velligan, {Dawn I} and Diamond, {Pamela M.} and Maples, {Natalie J} and Jim Mintz and Xueying Li and Glahn, {David C.} and Miller, {Alexander L}",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.schres.2008.02.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "102",
pages = "312--319",
journal = "Schizophrenia Research",
issn = "0920-9964",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing the efficacy of interventions that use environmental supports to improve outcomes in patients with schizophrenia

AU - Velligan, Dawn I

AU - Diamond, Pamela M.

AU - Maples, Natalie J

AU - Mintz, Jim

AU - Li, Xueying

AU - Glahn, David C.

AU - Miller, Alexander L

PY - 2008/7

Y1 - 2008/7

N2 - We examined the efficacy of 2 treatments using environmental supports (e.g. signs, alarms, pill containers, checklists) to improve functional outcomes in individuals with schizophrenia. 120 participants were randomized into one of 3 treatment groups 1) Cognitive Adaptation Training (CAT; supports customized to individual cognitive impairments and behaviors and maintained on weekly home visits 2) Generic Environmental Supports (GES; a generic set of supports given to patients at a routine clinic visit and replaced on a monthly basis) and 3) treatment as usual (TAU). Functional outcomes, positive symptoms and motivation were assessed at baseline, 3, 6, 9, 18 and 24months. After 9 months of intensive treatment with CAT, visits were decreased from weekly to monthly to examine whether treatment gains could be maintained. Results of a mixed effects regression model with repeated measures indicated a significant main effect of group (CAT > GES > TAU) with non-significant time and group by time interactions. Post-hoc analyses indicated that while individuals in CAT remained significantly better than those in TAU when treatment frequency was reduced, gains in CAT decreased to the level of those seen in GES. While group differences for positive symptoms were not significant, motivation improved in CAT and GES relative to TAU. The highest intensity treatment produced the best outcomes with respect to functioning. However, some improvements were seen with a relatively inexpensive, clinic-based treatment using a package of generic environmental supports.

AB - We examined the efficacy of 2 treatments using environmental supports (e.g. signs, alarms, pill containers, checklists) to improve functional outcomes in individuals with schizophrenia. 120 participants were randomized into one of 3 treatment groups 1) Cognitive Adaptation Training (CAT; supports customized to individual cognitive impairments and behaviors and maintained on weekly home visits 2) Generic Environmental Supports (GES; a generic set of supports given to patients at a routine clinic visit and replaced on a monthly basis) and 3) treatment as usual (TAU). Functional outcomes, positive symptoms and motivation were assessed at baseline, 3, 6, 9, 18 and 24months. After 9 months of intensive treatment with CAT, visits were decreased from weekly to monthly to examine whether treatment gains could be maintained. Results of a mixed effects regression model with repeated measures indicated a significant main effect of group (CAT > GES > TAU) with non-significant time and group by time interactions. Post-hoc analyses indicated that while individuals in CAT remained significantly better than those in TAU when treatment frequency was reduced, gains in CAT decreased to the level of those seen in GES. While group differences for positive symptoms were not significant, motivation improved in CAT and GES relative to TAU. The highest intensity treatment produced the best outcomes with respect to functioning. However, some improvements were seen with a relatively inexpensive, clinic-based treatment using a package of generic environmental supports.

KW - Cognitive Adaptation Training

KW - Environmental supports

KW - Functional outcomes

KW - Schizophrenia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=46249131867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=46249131867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.schres.2008.02.005

DO - 10.1016/j.schres.2008.02.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 18374542

AN - SCOPUS:46249131867

VL - 102

SP - 312

EP - 319

JO - Schizophrenia Research

JF - Schizophrenia Research

SN - 0920-9964

IS - 1-3

ER -