Comparative proteomic analysis of salt response proteins in seedling roots of two wheat varieties

  • Guangfang Guo
  • , Pei Ge
  • , Chaoying Ma
  • , Xiaohui Li
  • , Dongwen Lv
  • , Shunli Wang
  • , Wujun Ma
  • , Yueming Yan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

112 Scopus citations

Abstract

A comparative proteomic analysis was made of salt response in seedling roots of wheat cultivars Jing-411 (salt tolerant) and Chinese Spring (salt sensitive) subjected to a range of salt stress concentrations (0.5%, 1.5% and 2.5%) for 2. days. One hundred and ninety eight differentially expressed protein spots (DEPs) were located with at least two-fold differences in abundance on 2-DE maps, of which 144 were identified by MALDI-TOF-TOF MS. These proteins were involved primarily in carbon metabolism (31.9%), detoxification and defense (12.5%), chaperones (5.6%) and signal transduction (4.9%). Comparative analysis showed that 41 DEPs were salt responsive with significant expression changes in both varieties under salt stress, and 99 (52 in Jing-411 and 47 in Chinese Spring) were variety specific. Only 15 and 9 DEPs in Jing-411 and Chinese Spring, respectively, were up-regulated in abundance under all three salt concentrations. All dynamics of the DEPs were analyzed across all treatments. Some salt responsive DEPs, such as guanine nucleotide-binding protein subunit beta-like protein, RuBisCO large subunit-binding protein subunit alpha and pathogenesis related protein 10, were up-regulated significantly in Jing-411 under all salt concentrations, whereas they were down-regulated in salinity-stressed Chinese Spring.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1867-1885
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Proteomics
Volume75
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 16 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Proteome
  • Salt stress
  • Triticum aestivum

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Biochemistry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative proteomic analysis of salt response proteins in seedling roots of two wheat varieties'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this