Comparative assessment of patient outcomes with intraluminal or subintimal crossing of infrainguinal peripheral artery chronic total occlusions

Ananya Kondapalli, Haekyung Jeon-Slaughter, Hua Lu, Hao Xu, Houman Khalili, Anand Prasad, Ehrin J. Armstrong, Emmanouil S. Brilakis, Subhash Banerjee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compares procedural complications and clinical outcomes between subintimal crossing versus intraluminal crossing during endovascular treatment of infrainguinal peripheral artery chronic total occlusions (CTO). We identified 1335 CTO interventions in 1001 patients from the multicenter Excellence in Peripheral Artery Disease (XLPAD) registry from January 2005 to October 2015. Outcomes included 30-day and 12-month all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke, peripheral artery stent, or vessel, thrombosis (ST), need for any target limb endovascular or surgical revascularization, target limb major amputation and procedural complications. A subintimal crossing technique was necessary in 388 lesions (27% overall in 1335 lesions; 34% (n=351) in 1023 femoropopliteal lesions, and 12% (n=37) in 312 infrapopliteal lesions, p<0.01) with a lower procedural (p<0.01) and technical (p<0.01) success than the intraluminal in both femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal interventions. There were no significant differences in procedural complications, major adverse cardiac events, or clinically driven target limb revascularization at 1 year between the two groups, except a higher residual dissection rate in the subintimal crossing group than the intraluminal group in femoropopliteal target vessels (p = 0.04).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)39-45
Number of pages7
JournalVascular Medicine (United Kingdom)
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Fingerprint

Patient Outcome Assessment
Extremities
Arteries
Peripheral Arterial Disease
Amputation
Stents
Registries
Dissection
Cause of Death
Thrombosis
Stroke
Myocardial Infarction
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • chronic total occlusions
  • endovascular intervention
  • one-year outcomes
  • peripheral artery disease (PAD)
  • subintimal crossing technique

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Comparative assessment of patient outcomes with intraluminal or subintimal crossing of infrainguinal peripheral artery chronic total occlusions. / Kondapalli, Ananya; Jeon-Slaughter, Haekyung; Lu, Hua; Xu, Hao; Khalili, Houman; Prasad, Anand; Armstrong, Ehrin J.; Brilakis, Emmanouil S.; Banerjee, Subhash.

In: Vascular Medicine (United Kingdom), Vol. 23, No. 1, 01.02.2018, p. 39-45.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kondapalli, Ananya ; Jeon-Slaughter, Haekyung ; Lu, Hua ; Xu, Hao ; Khalili, Houman ; Prasad, Anand ; Armstrong, Ehrin J. ; Brilakis, Emmanouil S. ; Banerjee, Subhash. / Comparative assessment of patient outcomes with intraluminal or subintimal crossing of infrainguinal peripheral artery chronic total occlusions. In: Vascular Medicine (United Kingdom). 2018 ; Vol. 23, No. 1. pp. 39-45.
@article{a8ff3fc483ea4bb3894308e2b96b0b69,
title = "Comparative assessment of patient outcomes with intraluminal or subintimal crossing of infrainguinal peripheral artery chronic total occlusions",
abstract = "This study compares procedural complications and clinical outcomes between subintimal crossing versus intraluminal crossing during endovascular treatment of infrainguinal peripheral artery chronic total occlusions (CTO). We identified 1335 CTO interventions in 1001 patients from the multicenter Excellence in Peripheral Artery Disease (XLPAD) registry from January 2005 to October 2015. Outcomes included 30-day and 12-month all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke, peripheral artery stent, or vessel, thrombosis (ST), need for any target limb endovascular or surgical revascularization, target limb major amputation and procedural complications. A subintimal crossing technique was necessary in 388 lesions (27{\%} overall in 1335 lesions; 34{\%} (n=351) in 1023 femoropopliteal lesions, and 12{\%} (n=37) in 312 infrapopliteal lesions, p<0.01) with a lower procedural (p<0.01) and technical (p<0.01) success than the intraluminal in both femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal interventions. There were no significant differences in procedural complications, major adverse cardiac events, or clinically driven target limb revascularization at 1 year between the two groups, except a higher residual dissection rate in the subintimal crossing group than the intraluminal group in femoropopliteal target vessels (p = 0.04).",
keywords = "chronic total occlusions, endovascular intervention, one-year outcomes, peripheral artery disease (PAD), subintimal crossing technique",
author = "Ananya Kondapalli and Haekyung Jeon-Slaughter and Hua Lu and Hao Xu and Houman Khalili and Anand Prasad and Armstrong, {Ehrin J.} and Brilakis, {Emmanouil S.} and Subhash Banerjee",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1358863X17735192",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "39--45",
journal = "Vascular Medicine",
issn = "0738-4580",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative assessment of patient outcomes with intraluminal or subintimal crossing of infrainguinal peripheral artery chronic total occlusions

AU - Kondapalli, Ananya

AU - Jeon-Slaughter, Haekyung

AU - Lu, Hua

AU - Xu, Hao

AU - Khalili, Houman

AU - Prasad, Anand

AU - Armstrong, Ehrin J.

AU - Brilakis, Emmanouil S.

AU - Banerjee, Subhash

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - This study compares procedural complications and clinical outcomes between subintimal crossing versus intraluminal crossing during endovascular treatment of infrainguinal peripheral artery chronic total occlusions (CTO). We identified 1335 CTO interventions in 1001 patients from the multicenter Excellence in Peripheral Artery Disease (XLPAD) registry from January 2005 to October 2015. Outcomes included 30-day and 12-month all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke, peripheral artery stent, or vessel, thrombosis (ST), need for any target limb endovascular or surgical revascularization, target limb major amputation and procedural complications. A subintimal crossing technique was necessary in 388 lesions (27% overall in 1335 lesions; 34% (n=351) in 1023 femoropopliteal lesions, and 12% (n=37) in 312 infrapopliteal lesions, p<0.01) with a lower procedural (p<0.01) and technical (p<0.01) success than the intraluminal in both femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal interventions. There were no significant differences in procedural complications, major adverse cardiac events, or clinically driven target limb revascularization at 1 year between the two groups, except a higher residual dissection rate in the subintimal crossing group than the intraluminal group in femoropopliteal target vessels (p = 0.04).

AB - This study compares procedural complications and clinical outcomes between subintimal crossing versus intraluminal crossing during endovascular treatment of infrainguinal peripheral artery chronic total occlusions (CTO). We identified 1335 CTO interventions in 1001 patients from the multicenter Excellence in Peripheral Artery Disease (XLPAD) registry from January 2005 to October 2015. Outcomes included 30-day and 12-month all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke, peripheral artery stent, or vessel, thrombosis (ST), need for any target limb endovascular or surgical revascularization, target limb major amputation and procedural complications. A subintimal crossing technique was necessary in 388 lesions (27% overall in 1335 lesions; 34% (n=351) in 1023 femoropopliteal lesions, and 12% (n=37) in 312 infrapopliteal lesions, p<0.01) with a lower procedural (p<0.01) and technical (p<0.01) success than the intraluminal in both femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal interventions. There were no significant differences in procedural complications, major adverse cardiac events, or clinically driven target limb revascularization at 1 year between the two groups, except a higher residual dissection rate in the subintimal crossing group than the intraluminal group in femoropopliteal target vessels (p = 0.04).

KW - chronic total occlusions

KW - endovascular intervention

KW - one-year outcomes

KW - peripheral artery disease (PAD)

KW - subintimal crossing technique

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042877482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042877482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1358863X17735192

DO - 10.1177/1358863X17735192

M3 - Article

C2 - 29105577

AN - SCOPUS:85042877482

VL - 23

SP - 39

EP - 45

JO - Vascular Medicine

JF - Vascular Medicine

SN - 0738-4580

IS - 1

ER -