TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparable Efficacy of Laser-Cut and Braided Self Expanding Metallic Biliary Stent
T2 - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
AU - Loganathan, Priyadarshini
AU - Chandan, Saurabh
AU - Mohan, Babu P.
AU - Saligram, Shreyas
AU - Adler, Douglas G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2023/9
Y1 - 2023/9
N2 - Background and Aims: In patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO), endoscopic biliary drainage is the treatment of choice. Self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) are mainly used for this purpose, and data is limited on the comparative outcomes of laser-cut versus braided SEMS. Herein, we performed the first systematic review and meta-analysis to study the effectiveness and safety of braided and laser-cut SEMS in MBO. Methods: Multiple databases, including Medline, Scopus, and Embase, were searched (in May 2022) using specific terms for studies evaluating the outcomes of braided and laser-cut SEMS in MBO. Outcomes of interest were technical and clinical success, recurrent biliary obstruction, and adverse events. Standard meta-analysis methods were employed using the random-effects model. I2% heterogeneity was used to assess the heterogeneity. Results: Seven studies were included in the final analysis. (Laser-cut: 271 patients, 46% females, mean age 70 years; and braided: 282 patients, 47% females, mean age 72 years). The pooled rate of technical success and clinical success with laser-cut SEMS was 99% (95% CI [95–99; I 2 = 0%]), 86% [60–96; I 2 = 74%], and 98% [96–99; I 2 = 0%], 89% [74–95; I 2 = 78%] with braided. The pooled rate of recurrent biliary obstruction with laser-cut SEMS was 26% [14–43; I 2 = 88%] and 12% [5–27; I 2 = 56%) with braided. Pooled total adverse events were 11% [5–21; I 2 = 77%] in laser-cut and 12% [6–24; I 2 = 63%] in braided. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis demonstrates similar clinical outcomes with laser-cut and braided SEMS in MBO. Given the comparable performance, a cost-effectiveness analysis might help in choosing one type versus another in patients with MBO.
AB - Background and Aims: In patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO), endoscopic biliary drainage is the treatment of choice. Self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) are mainly used for this purpose, and data is limited on the comparative outcomes of laser-cut versus braided SEMS. Herein, we performed the first systematic review and meta-analysis to study the effectiveness and safety of braided and laser-cut SEMS in MBO. Methods: Multiple databases, including Medline, Scopus, and Embase, were searched (in May 2022) using specific terms for studies evaluating the outcomes of braided and laser-cut SEMS in MBO. Outcomes of interest were technical and clinical success, recurrent biliary obstruction, and adverse events. Standard meta-analysis methods were employed using the random-effects model. I2% heterogeneity was used to assess the heterogeneity. Results: Seven studies were included in the final analysis. (Laser-cut: 271 patients, 46% females, mean age 70 years; and braided: 282 patients, 47% females, mean age 72 years). The pooled rate of technical success and clinical success with laser-cut SEMS was 99% (95% CI [95–99; I 2 = 0%]), 86% [60–96; I 2 = 74%], and 98% [96–99; I 2 = 0%], 89% [74–95; I 2 = 78%] with braided. The pooled rate of recurrent biliary obstruction with laser-cut SEMS was 26% [14–43; I 2 = 88%] and 12% [5–27; I 2 = 56%) with braided. Pooled total adverse events were 11% [5–21; I 2 = 77%] in laser-cut and 12% [6–24; I 2 = 63%] in braided. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis demonstrates similar clinical outcomes with laser-cut and braided SEMS in MBO. Given the comparable performance, a cost-effectiveness analysis might help in choosing one type versus another in patients with MBO.
KW - Braided-type covered self-expandable metallic stents
KW - Laser-cut-type biliary stent
KW - Malignant biliary obstruction
KW - Recurrent biliary obstruction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164483035&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85164483035&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10620-023-08017-w
DO - 10.1007/s10620-023-08017-w
M3 - Article
C2 - 37439926
AN - SCOPUS:85164483035
SN - 0163-2116
VL - 68
SP - 3756
EP - 3764
JO - Digestive Diseases and Sciences
JF - Digestive Diseases and Sciences
IS - 9
ER -