Circumferential fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine using a carbon fiber ALIF cage implant versus autogenous bone graft: A comparative study

Boris A Zelle, Friedhelm Konig, Alfred Enderle, Rudolf Bertagnoli, Jochen Dorner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study reports on 92 patients treated with circumferential lumbar fusions for degenerative conditions. The elected procedure was a circumferential fusion using transpedicular stabilization. Two groups were examined depending on whether they were stabilized anteriorly with autogenous bicortical iliac crest graft (n = 38) or with an ALIF carbon fiber cage implant (n = 54). The patients were evaluated for clinical and radiographic outcome. The minimum follow-up interval was at least 12 months. Fusion rates, postoperative loss of correction, and clinical results, including pain at the bone donor site, neurologic function, satisfaction, depression, and consumption of analgesics, were not significantly different between patients with autogenous bone graft and patients with carbon cage. This study failed to prove major advantages of the carbon cages in the clinical and radiologic outcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)369-376
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques
Volume15
Issue number5
StatePublished - Oct 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Spine
Transplants
Bone and Bones
Carbon
Nervous System
Analgesics
Tissue Donors
Depression
Pain
carbon fiber

Keywords

  • ALIF
  • Bone graft
  • Carbon cage
  • Disc height
  • Interbody fusion
  • Lumbar spine
  • Pedicle screw

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Circumferential fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine using a carbon fiber ALIF cage implant versus autogenous bone graft : A comparative study. / Zelle, Boris A; Konig, Friedhelm; Enderle, Alfred; Bertagnoli, Rudolf; Dorner, Jochen.

In: Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, Vol. 15, No. 5, 10.2002, p. 369-376.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a19c5e69489e4e9b974189146c41a8d1,
title = "Circumferential fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine using a carbon fiber ALIF cage implant versus autogenous bone graft: A comparative study",
abstract = "This study reports on 92 patients treated with circumferential lumbar fusions for degenerative conditions. The elected procedure was a circumferential fusion using transpedicular stabilization. Two groups were examined depending on whether they were stabilized anteriorly with autogenous bicortical iliac crest graft (n = 38) or with an ALIF carbon fiber cage implant (n = 54). The patients were evaluated for clinical and radiographic outcome. The minimum follow-up interval was at least 12 months. Fusion rates, postoperative loss of correction, and clinical results, including pain at the bone donor site, neurologic function, satisfaction, depression, and consumption of analgesics, were not significantly different between patients with autogenous bone graft and patients with carbon cage. This study failed to prove major advantages of the carbon cages in the clinical and radiologic outcome.",
keywords = "ALIF, Bone graft, Carbon cage, Disc height, Interbody fusion, Lumbar spine, Pedicle screw",
author = "Zelle, {Boris A} and Friedhelm Konig and Alfred Enderle and Rudolf Bertagnoli and Jochen Dorner",
year = "2002",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "369--376",
journal = "Journal of Spinal Disorders",
issn = "1536-0652",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Circumferential fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine using a carbon fiber ALIF cage implant versus autogenous bone graft

T2 - A comparative study

AU - Zelle, Boris A

AU - Konig, Friedhelm

AU - Enderle, Alfred

AU - Bertagnoli, Rudolf

AU - Dorner, Jochen

PY - 2002/10

Y1 - 2002/10

N2 - This study reports on 92 patients treated with circumferential lumbar fusions for degenerative conditions. The elected procedure was a circumferential fusion using transpedicular stabilization. Two groups were examined depending on whether they were stabilized anteriorly with autogenous bicortical iliac crest graft (n = 38) or with an ALIF carbon fiber cage implant (n = 54). The patients were evaluated for clinical and radiographic outcome. The minimum follow-up interval was at least 12 months. Fusion rates, postoperative loss of correction, and clinical results, including pain at the bone donor site, neurologic function, satisfaction, depression, and consumption of analgesics, were not significantly different between patients with autogenous bone graft and patients with carbon cage. This study failed to prove major advantages of the carbon cages in the clinical and radiologic outcome.

AB - This study reports on 92 patients treated with circumferential lumbar fusions for degenerative conditions. The elected procedure was a circumferential fusion using transpedicular stabilization. Two groups were examined depending on whether they were stabilized anteriorly with autogenous bicortical iliac crest graft (n = 38) or with an ALIF carbon fiber cage implant (n = 54). The patients were evaluated for clinical and radiographic outcome. The minimum follow-up interval was at least 12 months. Fusion rates, postoperative loss of correction, and clinical results, including pain at the bone donor site, neurologic function, satisfaction, depression, and consumption of analgesics, were not significantly different between patients with autogenous bone graft and patients with carbon cage. This study failed to prove major advantages of the carbon cages in the clinical and radiologic outcome.

KW - ALIF

KW - Bone graft

KW - Carbon cage

KW - Disc height

KW - Interbody fusion

KW - Lumbar spine

KW - Pedicle screw

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036814770&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036814770&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12394660

AN - SCOPUS:0036814770

VL - 15

SP - 369

EP - 376

JO - Journal of Spinal Disorders

JF - Journal of Spinal Disorders

SN - 1536-0652

IS - 5

ER -