Chronic total occlusions—Is true lumen wire passage preferred to subintimal dissection re-entry?

Marc D. Feldman; Joel Michalek

doi:10.1002/ccd.28312

Chronic total occlusions—Is true lumen wire passage preferred to subintimal dissection re-entry?

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › peer-review

Abstract

True lumen crossing is superior to subintimal crossing. Subintimal versus true lumen crossing may only be apparent if IVUS is performed. Newer techniques for true lumen crossing need to be developed.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1057-1058
Number of pages	2
Journal	Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume	93
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28312
State	Published - May 1 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Access to Document

10.1002/ccd.28312

Cite this

@article{9a11680e11694d6ba0c605fb8a4a2781,

title = "Chronic total occlusions—Is true lumen wire passage preferred to subintimal dissection re-entry?",

abstract = "True lumen crossing is superior to subintimal crossing. Subintimal versus true lumen crossing may only be apparent if IVUS is performed. Newer techniques for true lumen crossing need to be developed.",

author = "Feldman, {Marc D.} and Joel Michalek",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.",

year = "2019",

month = may,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1002/ccd.28312",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "93",

pages = "1057--1058",

journal = "Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions",

issn = "1522-1946",