TY - JOUR
T1 - Characteristics of Glaucoma Patients Attending a Vision Rehabilitation Service
AU - Kaleem, Mona A.
AU - Rajjoub, Raneem
AU - Schiefer, Christopher
AU - Wall, Jennifer
AU - Applegate, Carol
AU - Tian, Jing
AU - Sunness, Janet S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Academy of Ophthalmology
PY - 2021/11/1
Y1 - 2021/11/1
N2 - Purpose: In this study, we describe common demographic and clinical characteristics of the glaucoma patient population attending vision rehabilitation. Design: Cross-sectional study. Participants: Patients attending a hospital-based vision rehabilitation center with a primary ocular diagnosis of glaucoma. Methods: Participants’ charts were retrospectively reviewed. Data extracted from medical records included demographics, referring physician, ocular history, glaucoma diagnosis, past ocular surgery, intraocular pressure, optic nerve findings, results of a functional intake assessing activities of daily living, depression, visual hallucinations, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), mean deviation (MD) scores on visual field testing, and log contrast sensitivity (CS). Main Outcome Measures: Participant demographic information, ocular history, self-reported difficulty with activities of daily living, depression, visual hallucinations, BCVA, visual field, and CS. Results: The mean age of patients in this study was 77 years and ranged from 8 to 103 years. Ninety percent of patients were referred to vision rehabilitation by an ophthalmologist. Median BCVA was 20/50. Fifty-five percent of patients were functionally monocular, and for all patients, there was a median 9-line difference in BCVA between eyes. Median MD score was −13.95 decibels (dB). Median CS was 1.05. Patients reported having the greatest difficulty with reading (88%), writing (72%), and mobility (67%). Seventy-eight percent of patients stopped driving, and 12% reported difficulty driving. Among those experiencing depression, there was a 4:1 ratio of depressed patients having difficulty with mobility. One-third of patients experienced visual hallucinations. Conclusions: Most glaucoma patients attending vision rehabilitation are not legally blind, but many are functionally monocular. This may cause greater difficulty performing functions that require the use of binocularity. Increasing the referral of younger glaucoma patients to vision rehabilitation may help patients learn to cope with the loss of visual function that occurs over time.
AB - Purpose: In this study, we describe common demographic and clinical characteristics of the glaucoma patient population attending vision rehabilitation. Design: Cross-sectional study. Participants: Patients attending a hospital-based vision rehabilitation center with a primary ocular diagnosis of glaucoma. Methods: Participants’ charts were retrospectively reviewed. Data extracted from medical records included demographics, referring physician, ocular history, glaucoma diagnosis, past ocular surgery, intraocular pressure, optic nerve findings, results of a functional intake assessing activities of daily living, depression, visual hallucinations, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), mean deviation (MD) scores on visual field testing, and log contrast sensitivity (CS). Main Outcome Measures: Participant demographic information, ocular history, self-reported difficulty with activities of daily living, depression, visual hallucinations, BCVA, visual field, and CS. Results: The mean age of patients in this study was 77 years and ranged from 8 to 103 years. Ninety percent of patients were referred to vision rehabilitation by an ophthalmologist. Median BCVA was 20/50. Fifty-five percent of patients were functionally monocular, and for all patients, there was a median 9-line difference in BCVA between eyes. Median MD score was −13.95 decibels (dB). Median CS was 1.05. Patients reported having the greatest difficulty with reading (88%), writing (72%), and mobility (67%). Seventy-eight percent of patients stopped driving, and 12% reported difficulty driving. Among those experiencing depression, there was a 4:1 ratio of depressed patients having difficulty with mobility. One-third of patients experienced visual hallucinations. Conclusions: Most glaucoma patients attending vision rehabilitation are not legally blind, but many are functionally monocular. This may cause greater difficulty performing functions that require the use of binocularity. Increasing the referral of younger glaucoma patients to vision rehabilitation may help patients learn to cope with the loss of visual function that occurs over time.
KW - Glaucoma
KW - Low vision
KW - Vision rehabilitation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118820800&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85118820800&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ogla.2021.03.005
DO - 10.1016/j.ogla.2021.03.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 33722789
AN - SCOPUS:85118820800
SN - 2589-4234
VL - 4
SP - 638
EP - 645
JO - Ophthalmology Glaucoma
JF - Ophthalmology Glaucoma
IS - 6
ER -