TY - JOUR
T1 - Challenges of conducting multi-center, multi-disciplinary urinary incontinence clinical trials
T2 - Experience of the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network
AU - Steers, William
AU - Richter, Holly
AU - Nyberg, Leroy
AU - Kusek, John
AU - Kraus, Stephen
AU - Dandreo, Kimberly
AU - Chai, Toby
AU - Brubaker, Linda
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Aims: The Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (UITN) was established in 2000 as a multi-disciplinary, multi-institutional network by the National Institute for Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) to investigate treatments for urinary incontinence in women. Methods: Over 8 years this network composed of urologists, urogynecologists, geriatricians, behavioral psychologists, physical therapists, nurses, epidemiologists, social scientists and statisticians from nine academic sites and a Data Coordinating Center has been effective in designing and completing prospective randomized clinical trials for treatments of urinary incontinence in women. Results: Two major clinical trials have been completed and a third has completed recruitment. The focus of the completed trials was a comparison of surgical methods to treat stress urinary incontinence whereas the third examined the potential benefit of combined behavioral intervention and antimuscarinic drug therapy to eliminate the need for long-term use of drug therapy alone to manage urge urinary incontinence. The scientific output of the network measured by abstracts, original papers and presentations demonstrates the productivity of the network. Conclusions: Many unique challenges are posed by a multi-disciplinary team located at sites across the United States undertaking several clinical trials. This review presents some of the logistics, barriers, tactics, and strategies used to create this successful clinical trials network focused on urinary incontinence.
AB - Aims: The Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (UITN) was established in 2000 as a multi-disciplinary, multi-institutional network by the National Institute for Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) to investigate treatments for urinary incontinence in women. Methods: Over 8 years this network composed of urologists, urogynecologists, geriatricians, behavioral psychologists, physical therapists, nurses, epidemiologists, social scientists and statisticians from nine academic sites and a Data Coordinating Center has been effective in designing and completing prospective randomized clinical trials for treatments of urinary incontinence in women. Results: Two major clinical trials have been completed and a third has completed recruitment. The focus of the completed trials was a comparison of surgical methods to treat stress urinary incontinence whereas the third examined the potential benefit of combined behavioral intervention and antimuscarinic drug therapy to eliminate the need for long-term use of drug therapy alone to manage urge urinary incontinence. The scientific output of the network measured by abstracts, original papers and presentations demonstrates the productivity of the network. Conclusions: Many unique challenges are posed by a multi-disciplinary team located at sites across the United States undertaking several clinical trials. This review presents some of the logistics, barriers, tactics, and strategies used to create this successful clinical trials network focused on urinary incontinence.
KW - Behavioral therapy
KW - Clinical trials
KW - Colposuspension
KW - Slings
KW - Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network
KW - Urinary incontinence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649946805&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649946805&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/nau.20653
DO - 10.1002/nau.20653
M3 - Review article
C2 - 19030190
AN - SCOPUS:67649946805
SN - 0733-2467
VL - 28
SP - 170
EP - 176
JO - Neurourology and Urodynamics
JF - Neurourology and Urodynamics
IS - 3
ER -