Breast cancer disparities and decision-making among U.S. women

Georgia N L Johnston Polacek, Mary Carol Ramos, Robert L Ferrer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The impact of breast cancer is immense for all women, but the literature reveals an even greater impact on women of color and among socially and economically disadvantaged populations. Persistent differences in incidence and outcome are undoubtedly due to multiple factors, but one element in poor outcome may be treatment choice. Those treatments shown to be related to best outcomes are less likely to be chosen by certain groups of women. The effects of economic and cultural factors on breast cancer treatment choice have not been thoroughly explored; these factors must be understood if health care professionals are to intervene effectively to address disparities and improve breast cancer outcomes for all women. Methods: A review of the breast cancer literature was conducted in order to: (1) describe breast cancer disparities in the United States; (2) delineate factors that might contribute to those disparities; (3) assess possible mitigating factors for predominant causes; (4) begin to decide how health care interventions might allay the factors that contribute to disparities in breast cancer incidence and mortality. Results: Breast cancer incidence and outcome disparities in the United States are due to multiple interacting factors. These include information about treatment, different types of treatment, the emotional context of decision-making, and patient preference for level of involvement. Treatment decision-making is complex. Conclusion: Health literacy and level of decision-making involvement, both embedded in social and economic reality, are key components in breast cancer treatment decision-making and may contribute to breast cancer disparities in the United States. Current models of shared decision-making may not be generalizable to all breast cancer patients. Practice implications: Optimal breast cancer outcomes for all women depend on culturally and ethnically appropriate professional support.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)158-165
Number of pages8
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume65
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2007

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Breast Neoplasms
Therapeutics
Incidence
Economics
Delivery of Health Care
Health Literacy
Patient Preference
Vulnerable Populations
Color
Mortality
Population

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Disparities
  • Economically disadvantaged
  • Minority women
  • Treatment
  • Treatment decision-making
  • Women of color

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Breast cancer disparities and decision-making among U.S. women. / Polacek, Georgia N L Johnston; Ramos, Mary Carol; Ferrer, Robert L.

In: Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 65, No. 2, 02.2007, p. 158-165.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Polacek, Georgia N L Johnston ; Ramos, Mary Carol ; Ferrer, Robert L. / Breast cancer disparities and decision-making among U.S. women. In: Patient Education and Counseling. 2007 ; Vol. 65, No. 2. pp. 158-165.
@article{a1f73a45a5754efdb77367399ca1f0fa,
title = "Breast cancer disparities and decision-making among U.S. women",
abstract = "Objective: The impact of breast cancer is immense for all women, but the literature reveals an even greater impact on women of color and among socially and economically disadvantaged populations. Persistent differences in incidence and outcome are undoubtedly due to multiple factors, but one element in poor outcome may be treatment choice. Those treatments shown to be related to best outcomes are less likely to be chosen by certain groups of women. The effects of economic and cultural factors on breast cancer treatment choice have not been thoroughly explored; these factors must be understood if health care professionals are to intervene effectively to address disparities and improve breast cancer outcomes for all women. Methods: A review of the breast cancer literature was conducted in order to: (1) describe breast cancer disparities in the United States; (2) delineate factors that might contribute to those disparities; (3) assess possible mitigating factors for predominant causes; (4) begin to decide how health care interventions might allay the factors that contribute to disparities in breast cancer incidence and mortality. Results: Breast cancer incidence and outcome disparities in the United States are due to multiple interacting factors. These include information about treatment, different types of treatment, the emotional context of decision-making, and patient preference for level of involvement. Treatment decision-making is complex. Conclusion: Health literacy and level of decision-making involvement, both embedded in social and economic reality, are key components in breast cancer treatment decision-making and may contribute to breast cancer disparities in the United States. Current models of shared decision-making may not be generalizable to all breast cancer patients. Practice implications: Optimal breast cancer outcomes for all women depend on culturally and ethnically appropriate professional support.",
keywords = "Breast cancer, Disparities, Economically disadvantaged, Minority women, Treatment, Treatment decision-making, Women of color",
author = "Polacek, {Georgia N L Johnston} and Ramos, {Mary Carol} and Ferrer, {Robert L}",
year = "2007",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "158--165",
journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Breast cancer disparities and decision-making among U.S. women

AU - Polacek, Georgia N L Johnston

AU - Ramos, Mary Carol

AU - Ferrer, Robert L

PY - 2007/2

Y1 - 2007/2

N2 - Objective: The impact of breast cancer is immense for all women, but the literature reveals an even greater impact on women of color and among socially and economically disadvantaged populations. Persistent differences in incidence and outcome are undoubtedly due to multiple factors, but one element in poor outcome may be treatment choice. Those treatments shown to be related to best outcomes are less likely to be chosen by certain groups of women. The effects of economic and cultural factors on breast cancer treatment choice have not been thoroughly explored; these factors must be understood if health care professionals are to intervene effectively to address disparities and improve breast cancer outcomes for all women. Methods: A review of the breast cancer literature was conducted in order to: (1) describe breast cancer disparities in the United States; (2) delineate factors that might contribute to those disparities; (3) assess possible mitigating factors for predominant causes; (4) begin to decide how health care interventions might allay the factors that contribute to disparities in breast cancer incidence and mortality. Results: Breast cancer incidence and outcome disparities in the United States are due to multiple interacting factors. These include information about treatment, different types of treatment, the emotional context of decision-making, and patient preference for level of involvement. Treatment decision-making is complex. Conclusion: Health literacy and level of decision-making involvement, both embedded in social and economic reality, are key components in breast cancer treatment decision-making and may contribute to breast cancer disparities in the United States. Current models of shared decision-making may not be generalizable to all breast cancer patients. Practice implications: Optimal breast cancer outcomes for all women depend on culturally and ethnically appropriate professional support.

AB - Objective: The impact of breast cancer is immense for all women, but the literature reveals an even greater impact on women of color and among socially and economically disadvantaged populations. Persistent differences in incidence and outcome are undoubtedly due to multiple factors, but one element in poor outcome may be treatment choice. Those treatments shown to be related to best outcomes are less likely to be chosen by certain groups of women. The effects of economic and cultural factors on breast cancer treatment choice have not been thoroughly explored; these factors must be understood if health care professionals are to intervene effectively to address disparities and improve breast cancer outcomes for all women. Methods: A review of the breast cancer literature was conducted in order to: (1) describe breast cancer disparities in the United States; (2) delineate factors that might contribute to those disparities; (3) assess possible mitigating factors for predominant causes; (4) begin to decide how health care interventions might allay the factors that contribute to disparities in breast cancer incidence and mortality. Results: Breast cancer incidence and outcome disparities in the United States are due to multiple interacting factors. These include information about treatment, different types of treatment, the emotional context of decision-making, and patient preference for level of involvement. Treatment decision-making is complex. Conclusion: Health literacy and level of decision-making involvement, both embedded in social and economic reality, are key components in breast cancer treatment decision-making and may contribute to breast cancer disparities in the United States. Current models of shared decision-making may not be generalizable to all breast cancer patients. Practice implications: Optimal breast cancer outcomes for all women depend on culturally and ethnically appropriate professional support.

KW - Breast cancer

KW - Disparities

KW - Economically disadvantaged

KW - Minority women

KW - Treatment

KW - Treatment decision-making

KW - Women of color

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846121306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846121306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.003

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 16870385

AN - SCOPUS:33846121306

VL - 65

SP - 158

EP - 165

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

SN - 0738-3991

IS - 2

ER -