TY - JOUR
T1 - Body mass index adjusted prostate-specific antigen and its application for prostate cancer screening
AU - Liang, Yuanyuan
AU - Ankerst, Donna P.
AU - Sanchez, Michael
AU - Leach, Robin J.
AU - Thompson, Ian M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Financial support provided by the Early Detection Research Network , National Cancer Institute , National Institutes of Health , Grant ( U01-CA86402 ) and the San Antonio Cancer Institute ( P30-CA54174 ).
PY - 2010/11
Y1 - 2010/11
N2 - Objectives: The prostate cancer prevention trial (PCPT) prostate cancer risk calculator was developed to aid physicians in counseling men for consideration of prostate biopsy based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and other clinical risk factors. This study investigated the role of body mass index (BMI) in this assessment. Materials and Methods: BMI category was defined as <25 (under/normal weight), 25.0-29.9 (overweight), 30.0-34.9 (obese [OB] I), 35.0-39.9 (OB II), and ≥40 (OB III). BMI-adjusted PSA for a man was determined by multiplying his PSA to the ratio of the geometrical mean of PSA for BMI <25 to the geometrical mean of PSA for his BMI category. Operating characteristics of PSA and BMI-adjusted PSA were compared with PCPT risks using area underneath the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Statistical tests of differences between AUCs for different diagnostic tests were performed with the nonparametric U-statistic method. Results: BMI-adjusted PSA equaled to unadjusted PSA multiplying 1.09, 1.20, 1.50, and 1.71 for men in overweight, OBI, OBII, and OBIII categories, respectively. The AUC for BMI-adjusted PSA values (0.84) did not differ from PSA; that of the PCPT calculator with BMI-adjusted PSA (0.87) did not differ from the calculator with PSA. Of 2816 men with a PSA less than or equal to 2.5 ng/mL who did not undergo biopsy, 126 (4.5%) would have a BMI-adjusted PSA exceeding 2.5 ng/mL. Conclusions: Because of lower levels of PSA, overweight and obese men may have diminished cancer detection opportunities when undergoing PSA-based screening.
AB - Objectives: The prostate cancer prevention trial (PCPT) prostate cancer risk calculator was developed to aid physicians in counseling men for consideration of prostate biopsy based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and other clinical risk factors. This study investigated the role of body mass index (BMI) in this assessment. Materials and Methods: BMI category was defined as <25 (under/normal weight), 25.0-29.9 (overweight), 30.0-34.9 (obese [OB] I), 35.0-39.9 (OB II), and ≥40 (OB III). BMI-adjusted PSA for a man was determined by multiplying his PSA to the ratio of the geometrical mean of PSA for BMI <25 to the geometrical mean of PSA for his BMI category. Operating characteristics of PSA and BMI-adjusted PSA were compared with PCPT risks using area underneath the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Statistical tests of differences between AUCs for different diagnostic tests were performed with the nonparametric U-statistic method. Results: BMI-adjusted PSA equaled to unadjusted PSA multiplying 1.09, 1.20, 1.50, and 1.71 for men in overweight, OBI, OBII, and OBIII categories, respectively. The AUC for BMI-adjusted PSA values (0.84) did not differ from PSA; that of the PCPT calculator with BMI-adjusted PSA (0.87) did not differ from the calculator with PSA. Of 2816 men with a PSA less than or equal to 2.5 ng/mL who did not undergo biopsy, 126 (4.5%) would have a BMI-adjusted PSA exceeding 2.5 ng/mL. Conclusions: Because of lower levels of PSA, overweight and obese men may have diminished cancer detection opportunities when undergoing PSA-based screening.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78149357541&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78149357541&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2010.04.060
DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2010.04.060
M3 - Article
C2 - 20739049
AN - SCOPUS:78149357541
SN - 0090-4295
VL - 76
SP - 1268.e1-1268.e6
JO - Urology
JF - Urology
IS - 5
ER -