TY - JOUR
T1 - Biodegradable and titanium osteosynthesis provide similar stability for orthognathic surgery
AU - Al-Moraissi, Essam Ahmed
AU - Ellis, Edward
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
PY - 2015/9/1
Y1 - 2015/9/1
N2 - Purpose The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that there is no difference in skeletal stability and material-related complications for titanium or biodegradable fixation when used for various orthognathic surgeries. Materials and Methods A systematic and electronic search of several databases with specific keywords, a reference search, and a manual search through September 2014 was performed. The inclusion criteria were clinical human studies, including randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, and retrospective studies, with the aim of comparing titanium and biodegradable osteosynthesis after various orthognathic surgeries. The outcome variables of horizontal and vertical relapse using cephalometrics and material usability were statistically analyzed. Results The initial PubMed search identified 557 studies, 22 of which met the inclusion criteria (8 randomized controlled trials, 10 controlled clinical trials, and 4 retrospective studies). No statistical difference was found between the 2 groups regarding skeletal stability after various orthognathic surgeries. There was no statistical difference with regard to wound problems, plate and screw removal, and palpability between biodegradable and titanium osteosynthesis, but there was a statistical difference with regard to intraoperative fracture of plates and screws in the biodegradable group. Conclusion The results of this meta-analysis support the hypothesis that biodegradable fixation devices offer similar skeletal stability as titanium fixation for orthognathic surgery. The results of this study also show that titanium fixation produced fewer broken screws during surgery compared with biodegradable screws.
AB - Purpose The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that there is no difference in skeletal stability and material-related complications for titanium or biodegradable fixation when used for various orthognathic surgeries. Materials and Methods A systematic and electronic search of several databases with specific keywords, a reference search, and a manual search through September 2014 was performed. The inclusion criteria were clinical human studies, including randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, and retrospective studies, with the aim of comparing titanium and biodegradable osteosynthesis after various orthognathic surgeries. The outcome variables of horizontal and vertical relapse using cephalometrics and material usability were statistically analyzed. Results The initial PubMed search identified 557 studies, 22 of which met the inclusion criteria (8 randomized controlled trials, 10 controlled clinical trials, and 4 retrospective studies). No statistical difference was found between the 2 groups regarding skeletal stability after various orthognathic surgeries. There was no statistical difference with regard to wound problems, plate and screw removal, and palpability between biodegradable and titanium osteosynthesis, but there was a statistical difference with regard to intraoperative fracture of plates and screws in the biodegradable group. Conclusion The results of this meta-analysis support the hypothesis that biodegradable fixation devices offer similar skeletal stability as titanium fixation for orthognathic surgery. The results of this study also show that titanium fixation produced fewer broken screws during surgery compared with biodegradable screws.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939472274&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939472274&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.joms.2015.01.035
DO - 10.1016/j.joms.2015.01.035
M3 - Review article
C2 - 25864125
AN - SCOPUS:84939472274
SN - 0278-2391
VL - 73
SP - 1795
EP - 1808
JO - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
JF - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
IS - 9
ER -