TY - JOUR
T1 - Association of insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction with incident diabetes among adults in China
T2 - a nationwide, population-based, prospective cohort study
AU - China Cardiometabolic Disease and Cancer Cohort Study Group
AU - Wang, Tiange
AU - Lu, Jieli
AU - Shi, Lixin
AU - Chen, Gang
AU - Xu, Min
AU - Xu, Yu
AU - Su, Qing
AU - Mu, Yiming
AU - Chen, Lulu
AU - Hu, Ruying
AU - Tang, Xulei
AU - Yu, Xuefeng
AU - Li, Mian
AU - Zhao, Zhiyun
AU - Chen, Yuhong
AU - Yan, Li
AU - Qin, Guijun
AU - Wan, Qin
AU - Dai, Meng
AU - Zhang, Di
AU - Gao, Zhengnan
AU - Wang, Guixia
AU - Shen, Feixia
AU - Luo, Zuojie
AU - Qin, Yingfen
AU - Chen, Li
AU - Huo, Yanan
AU - Li, Qiang
AU - Ye, Zhen
AU - Zhang, Yinfei
AU - Liu, Chao
AU - Wang, Youmin
AU - Wu, Shengli
AU - Yang, Tao
AU - Deng, Huacong
AU - Zhao, Jiajun
AU - Lai, Shenghan
AU - Bi, Yufang
AU - DeFronzo, Ralph A.
AU - Wang, Weiqing
AU - Ning, Guang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/2
Y1 - 2020/2
N2 - Background: National investigations on the interaction of insulin resistance, β-cell dysfunction, and obesity with the development of diabetes are scarce in China. We aimed to investigate the individual and joint associations of insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction with incident diabetes, and to examine the modifying effect of BMI and waist circumference on these associations among adults with normal glucose tolerance and with prediabetes. Methods: In this nationwide, population-based, prospective cohort study, we analysed data from the China Cardiometabolic Disease and Cancer Cohort Study, which recruited adults aged 40 years or older during 2011–12 (baseline) and invited participants to attend follow-up visits in 2014–16. Patients with diabetes at baseline, missing data for baseline measures of glucose tolerance status, missing data for baseline homoeostasis model assessment (HOMA) indexes, missing data for baseline covariates, and missing data for measures of glucose tolerance status at follow-up visits were excluded. At baseline and follow-up visits, a comprehensive set of questionnaires, clinical measurements, oral glucose tolerance tests, and laboratory examinations were carried out following standardised protocols. Glucose tolerance status and prediabetes were defined according to the American Diabetes Association 2010 criteria. In the main analysis, we examined the contributions of insulin resistance (HOMA of insulin resistance [HOMA-IR]) and β-cell dysfunction (HOMA of β-cell function [HOMA-B]) to diabetes risk, and evaluated the impact of obesity on these associations. Findings: 94 952 participants (31 517 men and 63 435 women) were included in the analysis. High HOMA-IR was associated with a greater hazard of diabetes (quartile 4 vs 1: hazard ratio [HR] 6·70, 95% CI 6·08–7·39; per unit increase in Z score: HR 2·17, 95% CI 2·10–2·24) than low HOMA-B (quartile 1 vs 4: 4·08, 3·72–4·48; per unit decrease in Z score: 1·92, 1·85–2·00). Approximately 24·4% (95% CI 23·6–25·2) of the incident diabetes could be attributed to insulin resistance and 12·4% (11·2–13·7) could be attributed to β-cell dysfunction. The HRs for diabetes were 1·83 (95% CI 1·72–1·95) per unit increase in Z score of HOMA-IR and 2·03 (1·86–2·21) per unit decrease in Z score of HOMA-B among participants with normal weight; the corresponding HRs for diabetes were 2·02 (1·93–2·11) and 1·88 (1·79–1·98) among participants with obesity (pinteraction=0·0091). These associations and interactions were similar for participants with normal glucose tolerance or prediabetes. Interpretation: Insulin resistance shows a stronger association with incident diabetes than does β-cell dysfunction in Chinese adults, and this association pattern was more prominent among adults with obesity. Given the limitations of HOMA indexes as surrogate measures of insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Funding: National Natural Science Foundation of China.
AB - Background: National investigations on the interaction of insulin resistance, β-cell dysfunction, and obesity with the development of diabetes are scarce in China. We aimed to investigate the individual and joint associations of insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction with incident diabetes, and to examine the modifying effect of BMI and waist circumference on these associations among adults with normal glucose tolerance and with prediabetes. Methods: In this nationwide, population-based, prospective cohort study, we analysed data from the China Cardiometabolic Disease and Cancer Cohort Study, which recruited adults aged 40 years or older during 2011–12 (baseline) and invited participants to attend follow-up visits in 2014–16. Patients with diabetes at baseline, missing data for baseline measures of glucose tolerance status, missing data for baseline homoeostasis model assessment (HOMA) indexes, missing data for baseline covariates, and missing data for measures of glucose tolerance status at follow-up visits were excluded. At baseline and follow-up visits, a comprehensive set of questionnaires, clinical measurements, oral glucose tolerance tests, and laboratory examinations were carried out following standardised protocols. Glucose tolerance status and prediabetes were defined according to the American Diabetes Association 2010 criteria. In the main analysis, we examined the contributions of insulin resistance (HOMA of insulin resistance [HOMA-IR]) and β-cell dysfunction (HOMA of β-cell function [HOMA-B]) to diabetes risk, and evaluated the impact of obesity on these associations. Findings: 94 952 participants (31 517 men and 63 435 women) were included in the analysis. High HOMA-IR was associated with a greater hazard of diabetes (quartile 4 vs 1: hazard ratio [HR] 6·70, 95% CI 6·08–7·39; per unit increase in Z score: HR 2·17, 95% CI 2·10–2·24) than low HOMA-B (quartile 1 vs 4: 4·08, 3·72–4·48; per unit decrease in Z score: 1·92, 1·85–2·00). Approximately 24·4% (95% CI 23·6–25·2) of the incident diabetes could be attributed to insulin resistance and 12·4% (11·2–13·7) could be attributed to β-cell dysfunction. The HRs for diabetes were 1·83 (95% CI 1·72–1·95) per unit increase in Z score of HOMA-IR and 2·03 (1·86–2·21) per unit decrease in Z score of HOMA-B among participants with normal weight; the corresponding HRs for diabetes were 2·02 (1·93–2·11) and 1·88 (1·79–1·98) among participants with obesity (pinteraction=0·0091). These associations and interactions were similar for participants with normal glucose tolerance or prediabetes. Interpretation: Insulin resistance shows a stronger association with incident diabetes than does β-cell dysfunction in Chinese adults, and this association pattern was more prominent among adults with obesity. Given the limitations of HOMA indexes as surrogate measures of insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Funding: National Natural Science Foundation of China.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077999442&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077999442&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30425-5
DO - 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30425-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 31879247
AN - SCOPUS:85077999442
SN - 2213-8587
VL - 8
SP - 115
EP - 124
JO - The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology
JF - The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology
IS - 2
ER -