TY - JOUR
T1 - Association Between Blood Pressure Variability and Cerebral Small-Vessel Disease
T2 - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
AU - the Variability in Blood Pressure and Brain Health Consortium
AU - Tully, Phillip J.
AU - Yano, Yuichiro
AU - Launer, Lenore J.
AU - Kario, Kazuomi
AU - Nagai, Michiaki
AU - Mooijaart, Simon P.
AU - Claassen, Jurgen A.H.R.
AU - Lattanzi, Simona
AU - Vincent, Andrew D.
AU - Tzourio, Christophe
AU - Anstey, Kaarin J.
AU - Beckett, Nigel
AU - Beiser, Alexa S.
AU - Birns, Jonathan
AU - Brickman, Adam M.
AU - Burns, Nicholas R.
AU - Cengiz, Mahir
AU - Cosh, Suzanne
AU - de Heus, Rianne A.A.
AU - de Leeuw, Peter W.
AU - Dorstyn, Diana
AU - Elias, Merrill F.
AU - Jukema, J. Wouter
AU - Kikuya, Masahiro
AU - Kroon, Abraham A.
AU - Mahajan, Rajiv
AU - McGrath, Emer R.
AU - Moll van Charante, Eric P.
AU - Ninomiya, Toshiharu
AU - Ohara, Tomoyuki
AU - Ohkubo, Takayoshi
AU - Oishi, Emi
AU - Peters, Ruth
AU - Richard, Edo
AU - Satoh, Michihiro
AU - Selvayanagam, Joseph
AU - Seshadri, Sudha
AU - Stott, David J.
AU - Trompet, Stella
AU - van Gool, Willem A.
AU - van Middelaar, Tessa
AU - Turnbull, Deborah A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.
PY - 2020/1/7
Y1 - 2020/1/7
N2 - Background: Research links blood pressure variability (BPV) with stroke; however, the association with cerebral small-vessel disease (CSVD) remains unclear. As BPV and mean blood pressure are interrelated, it remains uncertain whether BPV adds additional information to understanding cerebrovascular morphological characteristics. Methods and Results: A systematic review was performed from inception until March 3, 2019. Eligibility criteria included population, adults without stroke (<4 weeks); exposure, BPV quantified by any metric over any duration; comparison, (1) low versus high or mean BPV and (2) people with versus without CSVD; and outcomes, (1) CSVD as subcortical infarct, lacunae, white matter hyperintensities, cerebral microbleeds, or enlarged perivascular spaces; and (2) standardized mean difference in BPV. A total of 27 articles were meta-analyzed, comprising 12 309 unique brain scans. A total of 31 odds ratios (ORs) were pooled, indicating that higher systolic BPV was associated with higher odds for CSVD (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.14–1.42; I2=85%) independent of mean systolic pressure. Likewise, higher diastolic BPV was associated with higher odds for CSVD (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.14–1.48; I2=53%) independent of mean diastolic pressure. There was no evidence of a pairwise interaction between systolic/diastolic and BPV/mean ORs (P=0.47), nor a difference between BPV versus mean pressure ORs (P=0.58). Fifty-four standardized mean differences were pooled and provided similar results for pairwise interaction (P=0.38) and difference between standardized mean differences (P=0.70). Conclusions: On the basis of the available studies, BPV was associated with CSVD independent of mean blood pressure. However, more high-quality longitudinal data are required to elucidate whether BPV contributes unique variance to CSVD morphological characteristics.
AB - Background: Research links blood pressure variability (BPV) with stroke; however, the association with cerebral small-vessel disease (CSVD) remains unclear. As BPV and mean blood pressure are interrelated, it remains uncertain whether BPV adds additional information to understanding cerebrovascular morphological characteristics. Methods and Results: A systematic review was performed from inception until March 3, 2019. Eligibility criteria included population, adults without stroke (<4 weeks); exposure, BPV quantified by any metric over any duration; comparison, (1) low versus high or mean BPV and (2) people with versus without CSVD; and outcomes, (1) CSVD as subcortical infarct, lacunae, white matter hyperintensities, cerebral microbleeds, or enlarged perivascular spaces; and (2) standardized mean difference in BPV. A total of 27 articles were meta-analyzed, comprising 12 309 unique brain scans. A total of 31 odds ratios (ORs) were pooled, indicating that higher systolic BPV was associated with higher odds for CSVD (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.14–1.42; I2=85%) independent of mean systolic pressure. Likewise, higher diastolic BPV was associated with higher odds for CSVD (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.14–1.48; I2=53%) independent of mean diastolic pressure. There was no evidence of a pairwise interaction between systolic/diastolic and BPV/mean ORs (P=0.47), nor a difference between BPV versus mean pressure ORs (P=0.58). Fifty-four standardized mean differences were pooled and provided similar results for pairwise interaction (P=0.38) and difference between standardized mean differences (P=0.70). Conclusions: On the basis of the available studies, BPV was associated with CSVD independent of mean blood pressure. However, more high-quality longitudinal data are required to elucidate whether BPV contributes unique variance to CSVD morphological characteristics.
KW - blood pressure measurement/monitoring
KW - blood pressure variability
KW - high blood pressure
KW - meta-analysis
KW - systematic review
KW - white matter disease
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077179746&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077179746&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/JAHA.119.013841
DO - 10.1161/JAHA.119.013841
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31870233
AN - SCOPUS:85077179746
SN - 2047-9980
VL - 9
JO - Journal of the American Heart Association
JF - Journal of the American Heart Association
IS - 1
M1 - e013841
ER -