Assessment of endpoints for clinical trials for localized prostate cancer

Paul Schellhammer, Abraham Cockett, Laurent Boccon-Gibod, Mary Gospodarowicz, Arnon Krongrad, Ian Murchie Thompson, Peter Scardino, Mark Soloway, Jan Adolfsson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

44 Scopus citations


Objectives. The AUA Practice Guidelines Panel convened to address the issue of appropriate endpoints for assessment of treatment modalities for localized carcinoma of the prostate. Methods. A review of the literature and the design of existing clinical trials produced a consensus, which was presented to and critiqued by the members of the general conference. Results. The pitfalls associated with identification of local failure endpoints were discussed, and the more accurate endpoints of freedom from metastatic progression and overall survival were recognized. The strict definition that must be fulfilled for intermediate endpoints to become surrogates for metastasis free and/or survival endpoints was stressed. For more efficient and rapid conduct of future clinical trials, the urgent need to validate such surrogate endpoints by evaluation in randomized control trials is obvious. PSA, while an indicator of disease activity and a critical marker for estimating disease progression or regression in response to therapy, is not a surrogate for metastasis free or overall survival. Conclusion. Until surrogate endpoints are validated, the committee has evaluated the endpoints in current use, reviewed their limitations, and stressed the importance of quality-of-life assessment together with the traditional endpoint assessment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27-38
Number of pages12
Issue number4 SUPPL.
StatePublished - Apr 1997
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology


Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of endpoints for clinical trials for localized prostate cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this