Assessment of breastfeeding information in general obstetrics and gynecology textbooks

Tony Ogburn, Barbara L. Philipp, Eve Espey, Anne Merewood, Dana Espindola

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if breastfeeding information in obstetrics/ gynecology textbooks is complete, current, and evidence-based. Five general obstetrics/gynecology textbooks were reviewed to assess 22 basic breastfeeding facts. Five reviewers reviewed each text to determine the number of items presented, the number omitted, and the accuracy of the information. The mean number of breastfeeding facts present in each textbook was 14.6 (10-20), the mean number present and correct was 12.6 (5-18), present but incorrect/inconsistent 2 (0-5), and omitted 7.4 (2-12). The facts in the texts were usually correct. The percentages of correct answers for each text were 50%, 80%, 90%, 95%, and 100%, respectively. However, there were significant omissions; two of the texts missed half of the criteria scored. Scores for Omitted(Reviewed + Omitted) were 9%, 14%, 36%, 55%, and 55%. Overall, breastfeeding information in obstetrics/gynecology textbooks is variable and there are often significant omissions and/or inaccuracies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)58-62
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Human Lactation
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Breastfeeding
  • Educational materials
  • Obstetrics/gynecology
  • Physician education
  • Textbooks

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this