Assessment of adherence problems in patients with serious and persistent mental illness: Recommendations from the expert consensus guidelines

Dawn I Velligan, Peter J. Weiden, Martha Sajatovic, Jan Scott, Daniel Carpenter, Ruth Ross, John P. Docherty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

81 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Poor adherence to medication treatment can have devastating consequences for patients with serious mental illness. The literature review and recommendations in this article concerning assessment of adherence are reprinted from The Expert Consensus Guideline Series: Adherence Problems in Patients with Serious and Persistent Mental Illness, published in 2009. The expert consensus survey contained 39 questions (521 options) that asked about defining nonadherence, extent of adherence problems in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, risk factors for nonadherence, assessment methods, and interventions for specific types of adherence problems. The survey was completed by 41 (85%) of the 48 experts to whom it was sent. When evaluating adherence, the experts considered it important to assess both behavior and attitude, although they considered actual behavior most important. They also noted the importance of distinguishing patients who are not willing to take medication from those who are willing but not able to take their medication as prescribed due to forgetfulness, misunderstanding of instructions, or financial or environmental problems, since this will affect the type of intervention needed. Although self- and physician report are most commonly used to clinically assess adherence, they are often inaccurate and may underestimate nonadherence. The experts believe that more accurate information will be obtained by asking about any problems patients are having or anticipate having taking medication rather than if they have been taking their medication; They also recommended speaking with family or caregivers, if the patient gives permission, as well as using more objective measures (e.g., pill counts, pharmacy records, smart pill containers if available, and, when appropriate, medication plasma levels). Use of a validated self-report scale may also help improve accuracy. For patients who appear adherent to medication, the experts recommended monthly assessments for adherence, with additional assessments if there is a noticeable symptomatic change. If there is concern about adherence, they recommended more frequent (e.g., weekly) assessments. The article concludes with suggestions for clinical interview techniques for assessing adherence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)34-45
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Psychiatric Practice
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2010

Fingerprint

Consensus
Guidelines
Self Report
Guideline Adherence
Medication Adherence
Bipolar Disorder
Caregivers
Schizophrenia
Interviews
Physicians
Surveys and Questionnaires
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Adherence
  • Assessment
  • Bipolar disorder
  • Expert consensus guidelines
  • Medication
  • Schizophrenia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Assessment of adherence problems in patients with serious and persistent mental illness : Recommendations from the expert consensus guidelines. / Velligan, Dawn I; Weiden, Peter J.; Sajatovic, Martha; Scott, Jan; Carpenter, Daniel; Ross, Ruth; Docherty, John P.

In: Journal of Psychiatric Practice, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 34-45.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Velligan, Dawn I ; Weiden, Peter J. ; Sajatovic, Martha ; Scott, Jan ; Carpenter, Daniel ; Ross, Ruth ; Docherty, John P. / Assessment of adherence problems in patients with serious and persistent mental illness : Recommendations from the expert consensus guidelines. In: Journal of Psychiatric Practice. 2010 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 34-45.
@article{2ebdee37f5924fcb89cd3135bcceb98c,
title = "Assessment of adherence problems in patients with serious and persistent mental illness: Recommendations from the expert consensus guidelines",
abstract = "Poor adherence to medication treatment can have devastating consequences for patients with serious mental illness. The literature review and recommendations in this article concerning assessment of adherence are reprinted from The Expert Consensus Guideline Series: Adherence Problems in Patients with Serious and Persistent Mental Illness, published in 2009. The expert consensus survey contained 39 questions (521 options) that asked about defining nonadherence, extent of adherence problems in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, risk factors for nonadherence, assessment methods, and interventions for specific types of adherence problems. The survey was completed by 41 (85{\%}) of the 48 experts to whom it was sent. When evaluating adherence, the experts considered it important to assess both behavior and attitude, although they considered actual behavior most important. They also noted the importance of distinguishing patients who are not willing to take medication from those who are willing but not able to take their medication as prescribed due to forgetfulness, misunderstanding of instructions, or financial or environmental problems, since this will affect the type of intervention needed. Although self- and physician report are most commonly used to clinically assess adherence, they are often inaccurate and may underestimate nonadherence. The experts believe that more accurate information will be obtained by asking about any problems patients are having or anticipate having taking medication rather than if they have been taking their medication; They also recommended speaking with family or caregivers, if the patient gives permission, as well as using more objective measures (e.g., pill counts, pharmacy records, smart pill containers if available, and, when appropriate, medication plasma levels). Use of a validated self-report scale may also help improve accuracy. For patients who appear adherent to medication, the experts recommended monthly assessments for adherence, with additional assessments if there is a noticeable symptomatic change. If there is concern about adherence, they recommended more frequent (e.g., weekly) assessments. The article concludes with suggestions for clinical interview techniques for assessing adherence.",
keywords = "Adherence, Assessment, Bipolar disorder, Expert consensus guidelines, Medication, Schizophrenia",
author = "Velligan, {Dawn I} and Weiden, {Peter J.} and Martha Sajatovic and Jan Scott and Daniel Carpenter and Ruth Ross and Docherty, {John P.}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.pra.0000367776.96012.ca",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "34--45",
journal = "Journal of Psychiatric Practice",
issn = "1527-4160",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of adherence problems in patients with serious and persistent mental illness

T2 - Recommendations from the expert consensus guidelines

AU - Velligan, Dawn I

AU - Weiden, Peter J.

AU - Sajatovic, Martha

AU - Scott, Jan

AU - Carpenter, Daniel

AU - Ross, Ruth

AU - Docherty, John P.

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - Poor adherence to medication treatment can have devastating consequences for patients with serious mental illness. The literature review and recommendations in this article concerning assessment of adherence are reprinted from The Expert Consensus Guideline Series: Adherence Problems in Patients with Serious and Persistent Mental Illness, published in 2009. The expert consensus survey contained 39 questions (521 options) that asked about defining nonadherence, extent of adherence problems in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, risk factors for nonadherence, assessment methods, and interventions for specific types of adherence problems. The survey was completed by 41 (85%) of the 48 experts to whom it was sent. When evaluating adherence, the experts considered it important to assess both behavior and attitude, although they considered actual behavior most important. They also noted the importance of distinguishing patients who are not willing to take medication from those who are willing but not able to take their medication as prescribed due to forgetfulness, misunderstanding of instructions, or financial or environmental problems, since this will affect the type of intervention needed. Although self- and physician report are most commonly used to clinically assess adherence, they are often inaccurate and may underestimate nonadherence. The experts believe that more accurate information will be obtained by asking about any problems patients are having or anticipate having taking medication rather than if they have been taking their medication; They also recommended speaking with family or caregivers, if the patient gives permission, as well as using more objective measures (e.g., pill counts, pharmacy records, smart pill containers if available, and, when appropriate, medication plasma levels). Use of a validated self-report scale may also help improve accuracy. For patients who appear adherent to medication, the experts recommended monthly assessments for adherence, with additional assessments if there is a noticeable symptomatic change. If there is concern about adherence, they recommended more frequent (e.g., weekly) assessments. The article concludes with suggestions for clinical interview techniques for assessing adherence.

AB - Poor adherence to medication treatment can have devastating consequences for patients with serious mental illness. The literature review and recommendations in this article concerning assessment of adherence are reprinted from The Expert Consensus Guideline Series: Adherence Problems in Patients with Serious and Persistent Mental Illness, published in 2009. The expert consensus survey contained 39 questions (521 options) that asked about defining nonadherence, extent of adherence problems in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, risk factors for nonadherence, assessment methods, and interventions for specific types of adherence problems. The survey was completed by 41 (85%) of the 48 experts to whom it was sent. When evaluating adherence, the experts considered it important to assess both behavior and attitude, although they considered actual behavior most important. They also noted the importance of distinguishing patients who are not willing to take medication from those who are willing but not able to take their medication as prescribed due to forgetfulness, misunderstanding of instructions, or financial or environmental problems, since this will affect the type of intervention needed. Although self- and physician report are most commonly used to clinically assess adherence, they are often inaccurate and may underestimate nonadherence. The experts believe that more accurate information will be obtained by asking about any problems patients are having or anticipate having taking medication rather than if they have been taking their medication; They also recommended speaking with family or caregivers, if the patient gives permission, as well as using more objective measures (e.g., pill counts, pharmacy records, smart pill containers if available, and, when appropriate, medication plasma levels). Use of a validated self-report scale may also help improve accuracy. For patients who appear adherent to medication, the experts recommended monthly assessments for adherence, with additional assessments if there is a noticeable symptomatic change. If there is concern about adherence, they recommended more frequent (e.g., weekly) assessments. The article concludes with suggestions for clinical interview techniques for assessing adherence.

KW - Adherence

KW - Assessment

KW - Bipolar disorder

KW - Expert consensus guidelines

KW - Medication

KW - Schizophrenia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76849098872&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=76849098872&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.pra.0000367776.96012.ca

DO - 10.1097/01.pra.0000367776.96012.ca

M3 - Article

C2 - 20098229

AN - SCOPUS:76849098872

VL - 16

SP - 34

EP - 45

JO - Journal of Psychiatric Practice

JF - Journal of Psychiatric Practice

SN - 1527-4160

IS - 1

ER -