Applying the unattainable triangle in cardio-oncology care: Balancing cost, quality, and time

John Hoverson, Chirag Buch, Juan Ulloa-Rodriguez, Samuel Governor, Stella Pak, Prince Otchere

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

The unattainable triangle, also known as the iron triangle or triple constraint, traditionally applied in business as a model for balancing time, cost, and quality, offers valuable insight into the field of cardio-oncology. Cardio-oncology merges cardiovascular care with cancer treatment, addressing the growing risk of cardiovascular complications in cancer patients. Similar to the business model, this specialty faces the challenge of providing timely, high-quality, and cost-effective care. The urgency of cancer treatment often strains cardiovascular assessments, while comprehensive care increases costs due to advanced diagnostics and specialized teams. Establishing a cardio-oncology center of excellence, where oncologists and cardiologists collaborate in real-time, can help balance these demands, enhance care coordination, and manage resource utilization effectively. This article explores how the specialty of cardio-oncology could deliver comprehensive, timely, and affordable patient care by applying the unattainable triangle method.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)419-424
Number of pages6
JournalOncotarget
Volume16
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025

Keywords

  • cardio-oncology
  • cardiology
  • oncology
  • quality improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Applying the unattainable triangle in cardio-oncology care: Balancing cost, quality, and time'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this