TY - JOUR
T1 - Angiogenic activity of an enamel matrix derivative (EMD) and EMD-derived proteins
T2 - An experimental study in mice
AU - Thoma, Daniel S.
AU - Villar, Cristina C.
AU - Carnes, David L.
AU - Dard, Michel
AU - Patricia Chun, Yong Hee
AU - Cochran, David L.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2011 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2011/3
Y1 - 2011/3
N2 - Objectives: To determine whether all or only certain proteins in an enamel matrix derivative (EMD) are angiogenic. Materials and Methods: The angiogenic effect was analysed using an in vivo angiogenesis assay. Silicon tubes were filled with or without potential and known angiogenic-modulating factors: (i) an EMD parent, (ii) nine pools of EMD proteins, (iii) fibroblast growth factor/vascular endothelial growth factor and (iv) amelogenin. Silicon tubes were implanted subcutaneously in mice. Dextran-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) was injected via the tail vein, mice were euthanized and tubes were retrieved. Neovascularization was determined by measuring the amount of dextran-FITC within the tubes. Results: The greatest angiogenic potential of the EMD parent was at a weight of 125 ng, resulting in a 4.3-fold increase compared with the negative control. Five pools of EMD proteins showed a stronger angiogenic activity than the EMD parent. Pool 5 showed the greatest angiogenic activity, when compared with the negative control (8.1-fold increase) and with 125 ng of the EMD parent (4.2-fold increase). Amelogenin demonstrated a significantly higher angiogenic activity than the negative control (increase up to 4.0-fold) and the EMD parent (increase up to 1.6-fold). Conclusions: EMD parent, recombinant porcine amelogenin and certain pools of EMD proteins induced significant angiogenesis compared with the controls using a standardized in vivo assay.
AB - Objectives: To determine whether all or only certain proteins in an enamel matrix derivative (EMD) are angiogenic. Materials and Methods: The angiogenic effect was analysed using an in vivo angiogenesis assay. Silicon tubes were filled with or without potential and known angiogenic-modulating factors: (i) an EMD parent, (ii) nine pools of EMD proteins, (iii) fibroblast growth factor/vascular endothelial growth factor and (iv) amelogenin. Silicon tubes were implanted subcutaneously in mice. Dextran-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) was injected via the tail vein, mice were euthanized and tubes were retrieved. Neovascularization was determined by measuring the amount of dextran-FITC within the tubes. Results: The greatest angiogenic potential of the EMD parent was at a weight of 125 ng, resulting in a 4.3-fold increase compared with the negative control. Five pools of EMD proteins showed a stronger angiogenic activity than the EMD parent. Pool 5 showed the greatest angiogenic activity, when compared with the negative control (8.1-fold increase) and with 125 ng of the EMD parent (4.2-fold increase). Amelogenin demonstrated a significantly higher angiogenic activity than the negative control (increase up to 4.0-fold) and the EMD parent (increase up to 1.6-fold). Conclusions: EMD parent, recombinant porcine amelogenin and certain pools of EMD proteins induced significant angiogenesis compared with the controls using a standardized in vivo assay.
KW - amelogenin
KW - angiogenesis
KW - enamel matrix proteins
KW - fibroblast growth factor
KW - periodontal regeneration
KW - vascular endothelial growth factor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79551663351&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79551663351&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01656.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01656.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 21198764
AN - SCOPUS:79551663351
SN - 0303-6979
VL - 38
SP - 253
EP - 260
JO - Journal of Clinical Periodontology
JF - Journal of Clinical Periodontology
IS - 3
ER -