Analysis of separate training and validation radical prostatectomy cohorts identifies 0.25 mm diameter as an optimal definition for “large” cribriform prostatic adenocarcinoma

Emily Chan, Jesse K. McKenney, Sarah Hawley, Dillon Corrigan, Heidi Auman, Lisa F. Newcomb, Hilary D. Boyer, Peter R. Carroll, Matthew R. Cooperberg, Eric Klein, Ladan Fazli, Martin E. Gleave, Antonio Hurtado-Coll, Jeffry P. Simko, Peter S. Nelson, Ian M. Thompson, Maria S. Tretiakova, Dean Troyer, Lawrence D. True, Funda Vakar-LopezDaniel W. Lin, James D. Brooks, Ziding Feng, Jane K. Nguyen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Cribriform growth pattern is well-established as an adverse pathologic feature in prostate cancer. The literature suggests “large” cribriform glands associate with aggressive behavior; however, published studies use varying definitions for “large”. We aimed to identify an outcome-based quantitative cut-off for “large” vs “small” cribriform glands. We conducted an initial training phase using the tissue microarray based Canary retrospective radical prostatectomy cohort. Of 1287 patients analyzed, cribriform growth was observed in 307 (24%). Using Kaplan–Meier estimates of recurrence-free survival curves (RFS) that were stratified by cribriform gland size, we identified 0.25 mm as the optimal cutoff to identify more aggressive disease. In univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses, size >0.25 mm was a significant predictor of worse RFS compared to patients with cribriform glands ≤0.25 mm, independent of pre-operative PSA, grade, stage and margin status (p < 0.001). In addition, two different subset analyses of low-intermediate risk cases (cases with Gleason score ≤ 3 + 4 = 7; and cases with Gleason score = 3 + 4 = 7/4 + 3 = 7) likewise demonstrated patients with largest cribriform diameter >0.25 mm had a significantly lower RFS relative to patients with cribriform glands ≤0.25 mm (each subset p = 0.004). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in outcomes between patients with cribriform glands ≤ 0.25 mm and patients without cribriform glands. The >0.25 mm cut-off was validated as statistically significant in a separate 419 patient, completely embedded whole-section radical prostatectomy cohort by biochemical recurrence, metastasis-free survival, and disease specific death, even when cases with admixed Gleason pattern 5 carcinoma were excluded. In summary, our findings support reporting cribriform gland size and identify 0.25 mm as an optimal outcome-based quantitative measure for defining “large” cribriform glands. Moreover, cribriform glands >0.25 mm are associated with potential for metastatic disease independent of Gleason pattern 5 adenocarcinoma.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1092-1100
Number of pages9
JournalModern Pathology
Volume35
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of separate training and validation radical prostatectomy cohorts identifies 0.25 mm diameter as an optimal definition for “large” cribriform prostatic adenocarcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this