Analysis of sensitivity and specificity of a new digital subtraction system: an in vitro study.

S. B. Dove, W. D. McDavid, K. E. Hamilton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare a new digital subtraction system with conventional radiograph images for the detection of periapical and periodontal bone lesions. STUDY DESIGN: Periapical and periodontal bone lesions were simulated with cortical bone chips of varying sizes placed on a human dry mandible. Radiographic film images were acquired from varying projections and were subsequently digitized, registered, and subtracted. Four clinicians evaluated the subtracted images, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated. RESULTS: The mean sensitivity and specificity of the Diagnostic Subtraction Radiography system for detecting bone lesions of all sizes with varying projection geometry were 87.90% and 85.23%, respectively. The corresponding results for conventional radiograph images were 47.54% and 97.38%. The difference in sensitivity was statistically significant, whereas the difference in specificity was not. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that, even when radiographs are taken from disparate projection geometries, the Diagnostic Subtraction Radiography system is capable of excellent discrimination between healthy and disease states in this in vitro model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)771-776
Number of pages6
JournalOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics
Volume89
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 2000

Fingerprint

Bone and Bones
Sensitivity and Specificity
Radiography
X-Ray Film
Mandible
In Vitro Techniques
Cortical Bone

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Surgery

Cite this

Analysis of sensitivity and specificity of a new digital subtraction system : an in vitro study. / Dove, S. B.; McDavid, W. D.; Hamilton, K. E.

In: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics, Vol. 89, No. 6, 06.2000, p. 771-776.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{aa2fcbd09a0a49ea81fe767718a19335,
title = "Analysis of sensitivity and specificity of a new digital subtraction system: an in vitro study.",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare a new digital subtraction system with conventional radiograph images for the detection of periapical and periodontal bone lesions. STUDY DESIGN: Periapical and periodontal bone lesions were simulated with cortical bone chips of varying sizes placed on a human dry mandible. Radiographic film images were acquired from varying projections and were subsequently digitized, registered, and subtracted. Four clinicians evaluated the subtracted images, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated. RESULTS: The mean sensitivity and specificity of the Diagnostic Subtraction Radiography system for detecting bone lesions of all sizes with varying projection geometry were 87.90{\%} and 85.23{\%}, respectively. The corresponding results for conventional radiograph images were 47.54{\%} and 97.38{\%}. The difference in sensitivity was statistically significant, whereas the difference in specificity was not. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that, even when radiographs are taken from disparate projection geometries, the Diagnostic Subtraction Radiography system is capable of excellent discrimination between healthy and disease states in this in vitro model.",
author = "Dove, {S. B.} and McDavid, {W. D.} and Hamilton, {K. E.}",
year = "2000",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "89",
pages = "771--776",
journal = "Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology",
issn = "2212-4403",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of sensitivity and specificity of a new digital subtraction system

T2 - an in vitro study.

AU - Dove, S. B.

AU - McDavid, W. D.

AU - Hamilton, K. E.

PY - 2000/6

Y1 - 2000/6

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare a new digital subtraction system with conventional radiograph images for the detection of periapical and periodontal bone lesions. STUDY DESIGN: Periapical and periodontal bone lesions were simulated with cortical bone chips of varying sizes placed on a human dry mandible. Radiographic film images were acquired from varying projections and were subsequently digitized, registered, and subtracted. Four clinicians evaluated the subtracted images, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated. RESULTS: The mean sensitivity and specificity of the Diagnostic Subtraction Radiography system for detecting bone lesions of all sizes with varying projection geometry were 87.90% and 85.23%, respectively. The corresponding results for conventional radiograph images were 47.54% and 97.38%. The difference in sensitivity was statistically significant, whereas the difference in specificity was not. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that, even when radiographs are taken from disparate projection geometries, the Diagnostic Subtraction Radiography system is capable of excellent discrimination between healthy and disease states in this in vitro model.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare a new digital subtraction system with conventional radiograph images for the detection of periapical and periodontal bone lesions. STUDY DESIGN: Periapical and periodontal bone lesions were simulated with cortical bone chips of varying sizes placed on a human dry mandible. Radiographic film images were acquired from varying projections and were subsequently digitized, registered, and subtracted. Four clinicians evaluated the subtracted images, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated. RESULTS: The mean sensitivity and specificity of the Diagnostic Subtraction Radiography system for detecting bone lesions of all sizes with varying projection geometry were 87.90% and 85.23%, respectively. The corresponding results for conventional radiograph images were 47.54% and 97.38%. The difference in sensitivity was statistically significant, whereas the difference in specificity was not. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that, even when radiographs are taken from disparate projection geometries, the Diagnostic Subtraction Radiography system is capable of excellent discrimination between healthy and disease states in this in vitro model.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034199997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034199997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10846136

AN - SCOPUS:0034199997

VL - 89

SP - 771

EP - 776

JO - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology

JF - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology

SN - 2212-4403

IS - 6

ER -