An investigation of internship directors' perspectives on the learning objectives required by the commission on accreditation

James M Stedman, Lawrence S. Schoenfeld, Louise O'donnell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Internships are accredited by the American Psychological Association's Commission on Accreditation (CoA). For initial and continuing accreditation, programs must meet a number of standards, including specific learning objectives. Currently all phases of clinical education in psychology are being debated, and previous studies have demonstrated that internships view their primary mission as clinical education in assessment and treatment. There are no studies asking internship directors to directly reflect their perspectives regarding the other five mandated learning objectives. This study investigated internship directors' perspectives on all of the current learning objectives. Results indicated that internship directors value and understand Theories and Methods of Assessment/Diagnosis, Theories and Methods of Intervention, and Issues of Cultural and Individual Diversity; that Theories and Methods of Consultation needs operational clarification; and that the Theories and Methods of Supervision, Strategies of Scholarly Inquiry, and Theory and Methods of Evaluation are less valued and not as well understood and perhaps are candidates for elimination.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)134-138
Number of pages5
JournalTraining and Education in Professional Psychology
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Accreditation
learning objective
internship
Internship and Residency
accreditation
director
Learning
Education
Cultural Diversity
supervision
education
Referral and Consultation
candidacy
psychology
Psychology
evaluation
Values

Keywords

  • Accreditation
  • Commission on accreditation
  • Internship
  • Learning objectives

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

An investigation of internship directors' perspectives on the learning objectives required by the commission on accreditation. / Stedman, James M; Schoenfeld, Lawrence S.; O'donnell, Louise.

In: Training and Education in Professional Psychology, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2013, p. 134-138.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{37980c21fb5d4bd98bc827b107de9673,
title = "An investigation of internship directors' perspectives on the learning objectives required by the commission on accreditation",
abstract = "Internships are accredited by the American Psychological Association's Commission on Accreditation (CoA). For initial and continuing accreditation, programs must meet a number of standards, including specific learning objectives. Currently all phases of clinical education in psychology are being debated, and previous studies have demonstrated that internships view their primary mission as clinical education in assessment and treatment. There are no studies asking internship directors to directly reflect their perspectives regarding the other five mandated learning objectives. This study investigated internship directors' perspectives on all of the current learning objectives. Results indicated that internship directors value and understand Theories and Methods of Assessment/Diagnosis, Theories and Methods of Intervention, and Issues of Cultural and Individual Diversity; that Theories and Methods of Consultation needs operational clarification; and that the Theories and Methods of Supervision, Strategies of Scholarly Inquiry, and Theory and Methods of Evaluation are less valued and not as well understood and perhaps are candidates for elimination.",
keywords = "Accreditation, Commission on accreditation, Internship, Learning objectives",
author = "Stedman, {James M} and Schoenfeld, {Lawrence S.} and Louise O'donnell",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1037/a0031660",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "134--138",
journal = "Training and Education in Professional Psychology",
issn = "1931-3918",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An investigation of internship directors' perspectives on the learning objectives required by the commission on accreditation

AU - Stedman, James M

AU - Schoenfeld, Lawrence S.

AU - O'donnell, Louise

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Internships are accredited by the American Psychological Association's Commission on Accreditation (CoA). For initial and continuing accreditation, programs must meet a number of standards, including specific learning objectives. Currently all phases of clinical education in psychology are being debated, and previous studies have demonstrated that internships view their primary mission as clinical education in assessment and treatment. There are no studies asking internship directors to directly reflect their perspectives regarding the other five mandated learning objectives. This study investigated internship directors' perspectives on all of the current learning objectives. Results indicated that internship directors value and understand Theories and Methods of Assessment/Diagnosis, Theories and Methods of Intervention, and Issues of Cultural and Individual Diversity; that Theories and Methods of Consultation needs operational clarification; and that the Theories and Methods of Supervision, Strategies of Scholarly Inquiry, and Theory and Methods of Evaluation are less valued and not as well understood and perhaps are candidates for elimination.

AB - Internships are accredited by the American Psychological Association's Commission on Accreditation (CoA). For initial and continuing accreditation, programs must meet a number of standards, including specific learning objectives. Currently all phases of clinical education in psychology are being debated, and previous studies have demonstrated that internships view their primary mission as clinical education in assessment and treatment. There are no studies asking internship directors to directly reflect their perspectives regarding the other five mandated learning objectives. This study investigated internship directors' perspectives on all of the current learning objectives. Results indicated that internship directors value and understand Theories and Methods of Assessment/Diagnosis, Theories and Methods of Intervention, and Issues of Cultural and Individual Diversity; that Theories and Methods of Consultation needs operational clarification; and that the Theories and Methods of Supervision, Strategies of Scholarly Inquiry, and Theory and Methods of Evaluation are less valued and not as well understood and perhaps are candidates for elimination.

KW - Accreditation

KW - Commission on accreditation

KW - Internship

KW - Learning objectives

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881233822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881233822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0031660

DO - 10.1037/a0031660

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84881233822

VL - 7

SP - 134

EP - 138

JO - Training and Education in Professional Psychology

JF - Training and Education in Professional Psychology

SN - 1931-3918

IS - 2

ER -