Airway pressure release ventilation versus assist-control ventilation: A comparative propensity score and international cohort study

Marco González, Alejandro C. Arroliga, Fernando Frutos-Vivar, Konstantinos Raymondos, Andres Esteban, Christian Putensen, Carlos Apezteguía, Javier Hurtado, Pablo Desmery, Vinko Tomicic, José Elizalde, Fekri Abroug, Yaseen Arabi, Rui Moreno, Antonio Anzueto, Niall D. Ferguson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

66 Scopus citations


Purpose: To compare characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients receiving airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) or biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP) to assist-control ventilation (A/C) as their primary mode of ventilatory support. The objective was to estimate if patients ventilated with APRV/BIPAP have a lower mortality. Methods: Secondary analysis of an observational study in 349 intensive care units from 23 countries. A total of 234 patients were included who were ventilated only with APRV/BIPAP and 1,228 patients who were ventilated only with A/C. A case-matched analysis according to a propensity score was used to make comparisons between groups. Results: In logistic regression analysis, the most important factor associated with the use of APRV/BIPAP was the country (196 of 234 patients were from German units). Patients with coma or congestive heart failure as the reason to start mechanical ventilation, pH <7.15 prior to mechanical ventilation, and patients who developed respiratory failure (SOFA score >2) after intubation with or without criteria of acute respiratory distress syndrome were less likely to be ventilated with APRV/BIPAP. In the case-matched analysis there were no differences in outcomes, including mortality in the intensive care unit, days of mechanical ventilation or weaning, rate of reintubation, length of stay in the intensive care unit or hospital, and mortality in the hospital. Conclusions: In this study, the APRV/BIPAP ventilation mode is being used widely across many causes of respiratory failure, but only in selected geographic areas. In our patient population we could not demonstrate any improvement in outcomes with APRV/BIPAP compared with assist-control ventilation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)817-827
Number of pages11
JournalIntensive care medicine
Issue number5
StatePublished - May 2010


  • Airway pressure release ventilation
  • Assist-control ventilation
  • Epidemiology
  • Mechanical ventilation
  • Mortality
  • Propensity score

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Airway pressure release ventilation versus assist-control ventilation: A comparative propensity score and international cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this