TY - JOUR
T1 - Agitation Techniques to Enhance Drainage of Retained Hemothorax
AU - Makey, Ian A.
AU - Das, Nitin A.
AU - Jacob, Samuel
AU - El-Sayed Ahmed, Magdy M.
AU - Makey, Colleen M.
AU - Johnson, Scott B.
AU - Thomas, Mathew
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Background. Retained hemothorax (RH) is a common problem in cardiothoracic and trauma surgery. We aimed to determine the optimum agitation technique to enhance thrombus dissolution and drainage and to apply the technique to a porcine-retained hemothorax. Methods. Three agitation techniques were tested: flush irrigation, ultrasound, and vibration. We used the techniques in a benchtop model with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and pig hemothorax with tPA. We used the most promising technique vibration in a pig hemothorax without tPA. Statistics. We used 2-sample t tests for each comparison and Cohen d tests to calculate effect size (ES). Results. In the benchtop model, mean drainages in the agitation group and control group and the ES were flush irrigation, 42%, 28%, and 2.91 (P =.10); ultrasound, 35%, 27%, and.76 (P =.30); and vibration, 28%, 19%, and 1.14 (P =.04). In the pig hemothorax with tPA, mean drainages and the ES of each agitation technique compared with control (58%) were flush irrigation, 80% and 1.14 (P =.37); ultrasound, 80% and 2.11 (P =.17); and vibration, 95% and 3.98 (P =.06). In the pig hemothorax model without tPA, mean drainages of the vibration technique and control group were 50% and 43% (ES =.29; P =.65). Discussion. In vitro studies suggested flush irrigation had the greatest effect, whereas only vibration was significantly different vs the respective controls. In vivo with tPA, vibration showed promising but not statistically significant results. Results of in vivo experiments without tPA were negative. Conclusion. Agitation techniques, in combination with tPA, may enhance drainage of hemothorax.
AB - Background. Retained hemothorax (RH) is a common problem in cardiothoracic and trauma surgery. We aimed to determine the optimum agitation technique to enhance thrombus dissolution and drainage and to apply the technique to a porcine-retained hemothorax. Methods. Three agitation techniques were tested: flush irrigation, ultrasound, and vibration. We used the techniques in a benchtop model with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and pig hemothorax with tPA. We used the most promising technique vibration in a pig hemothorax without tPA. Statistics. We used 2-sample t tests for each comparison and Cohen d tests to calculate effect size (ES). Results. In the benchtop model, mean drainages in the agitation group and control group and the ES were flush irrigation, 42%, 28%, and 2.91 (P =.10); ultrasound, 35%, 27%, and.76 (P =.30); and vibration, 28%, 19%, and 1.14 (P =.04). In the pig hemothorax with tPA, mean drainages and the ES of each agitation technique compared with control (58%) were flush irrigation, 80% and 1.14 (P =.37); ultrasound, 80% and 2.11 (P =.17); and vibration, 95% and 3.98 (P =.06). In the pig hemothorax model without tPA, mean drainages of the vibration technique and control group were 50% and 43% (ES =.29; P =.65). Discussion. In vitro studies suggested flush irrigation had the greatest effect, whereas only vibration was significantly different vs the respective controls. In vivo with tPA, vibration showed promising but not statistically significant results. Results of in vivo experiments without tPA were negative. Conclusion. Agitation techniques, in combination with tPA, may enhance drainage of hemothorax.
KW - agitation
KW - chest tube
KW - irrigation
KW - retained hemothorax
KW - thrombolysis
KW - tissue plasminogen activator
KW - ultrasound
KW - vibration
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097791731&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85097791731&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1553350620978002
DO - 10.1177/1553350620978002
M3 - Article
C2 - 33339490
AN - SCOPUS:85097791731
SN - 1553-3506
VL - 28
SP - 544
EP - 551
JO - Surgical Innovation
JF - Surgical Innovation
IS - 5
ER -