Aerosol Production with Surgical Instrumentation: Implications for Head and Neck Surgery in the COVID-19 Era

Garren M.I. Low, Bailey LeConte, Arturo A. Eguia, Ashley Kim, Ron J. Karni, Amber U. Luong, Kunal S. Jain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Evaluating the aerosolization of droplets from surgical instruments to assess the implications of surgery in SARS-CoV-2 transmission for both patients and providers. Cadaver study. Outpatient surgery center. Aerosolized particles between 0.3 and 25 microns were measured. Instruments tested included monopolar cautery with and without suction, bipolar cautery, a bipolar vessel sealing device, and tissue scissors. Each trial was compared to a background reading. Monopolar cautery without suction, Ligasure used continuously and Bipolar cautery produced the most aerosols. Monopolar cautery with simultaneous suction produced no detectable aerosols. Ligasure used for a single cycle produced notably fewer aerosols than during continuous use. Most aerosols produced were < 5 microns. These data support n95 use during surgical management of the upper aerodigestive tract, as well as the use of suction in the surgical field.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3145-3150
Number of pages6
JournalIndian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery
Volume74
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Aerosols
  • COVID-19
  • Head and neck cancer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Aerosol Production with Surgical Instrumentation: Implications for Head and Neck Surgery in the COVID-19 Era'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this