Adaptation, evaluation, and updating of guidelines: Article 14 in integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report

Jako S. Burgers, Antonio R Anzueto, Peter N. Black, Alvaro A. Cruz, Béatrice Fervers, Ian D. Graham, Mark Metersky, Mark Woodhead, Barbara P. Yawn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Professional societies, like many other organizations, have recognized the need to use more rigorous processes to ensure that health care recommendations are informed by the best available research evidence. Thisisthe last of a series of 14 articles that methodologists and researchers from around the world have prepared to advise guideline developers in respiratory and other diseases on how to achieve this. We updated a review of the literature on guideline adaptation, evaluation, and updating, focusing on four key questions. Methods: In this review we addressed the following questions. (1) Which high-quality guidelines on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are available? (2) How should guidelines be adapted to the user's context and culture? (3) How should the use of guidelinesbe evaluated in clinical practice? and (4) How should guidelines be efficiently keptup-to-date? We did not conduct systematic reviews ourselves. We relied on a literature review published in 2006 and on a manual produced by the ADAPTE Collaboration to inform our judgments, as wellas our collective experience and workshop discussions. Results and Discussion: Guideline adaptation can be seen as an alternative to de novo development and as part of an implementation process, taking into consideration the user's own context. A systematic approach should be followed toensure high quality of the resulting guidance. On the topic of COPD, many guidelines are available. Guidelines of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease and of the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society are particularly well-suited for adaptation. The adaptation process includes (1) definition of specific questions that need to be answered by the guideline; (2) assessment of guideline quality; (3) assessment of the clinical content, validity, acceptability, applicability, and transferability of the recommendations; and (4) decisions about adoption or adaptation of the recommendations. The use of the guidelines in practice can be measured with performance indicators. Adverse effects of strict adherence to guideline recommendations should be prevented, in particular when the improvement of patient outcomes is unclear. COPD guidelines should be updated at least every 2 years. Collaboration between COPD guideline developers is recommended to prevent duplication of effort.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)304-310
Number of pages7
JournalProceedings of the American Thoracic Society
Volume9
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 15 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Guidelines
Education
Guideline Adherence
Practice Guidelines
Research Personnel
Organizations
Delivery of Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Adaptation, evaluation, and updating of guidelines : Article 14 in integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report. / Burgers, Jako S.; Anzueto, Antonio R; Black, Peter N.; Cruz, Alvaro A.; Fervers, Béatrice; Graham, Ian D.; Metersky, Mark; Woodhead, Mark; Yawn, Barbara P.

In: Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society, Vol. 9, No. 5, 15.12.2012, p. 304-310.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Burgers, Jako S. ; Anzueto, Antonio R ; Black, Peter N. ; Cruz, Alvaro A. ; Fervers, Béatrice ; Graham, Ian D. ; Metersky, Mark ; Woodhead, Mark ; Yawn, Barbara P. / Adaptation, evaluation, and updating of guidelines : Article 14 in integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report. In: Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society. 2012 ; Vol. 9, No. 5. pp. 304-310.
@article{134cde05adb04baa9eb4744601988637,
title = "Adaptation, evaluation, and updating of guidelines: Article 14 in integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report",
abstract = "Introduction: Professional societies, like many other organizations, have recognized the need to use more rigorous processes to ensure that health care recommendations are informed by the best available research evidence. Thisisthe last of a series of 14 articles that methodologists and researchers from around the world have prepared to advise guideline developers in respiratory and other diseases on how to achieve this. We updated a review of the literature on guideline adaptation, evaluation, and updating, focusing on four key questions. Methods: In this review we addressed the following questions. (1) Which high-quality guidelines on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are available? (2) How should guidelines be adapted to the user's context and culture? (3) How should the use of guidelinesbe evaluated in clinical practice? and (4) How should guidelines be efficiently keptup-to-date? We did not conduct systematic reviews ourselves. We relied on a literature review published in 2006 and on a manual produced by the ADAPTE Collaboration to inform our judgments, as wellas our collective experience and workshop discussions. Results and Discussion: Guideline adaptation can be seen as an alternative to de novo development and as part of an implementation process, taking into consideration the user's own context. A systematic approach should be followed toensure high quality of the resulting guidance. On the topic of COPD, many guidelines are available. Guidelines of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease and of the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society are particularly well-suited for adaptation. The adaptation process includes (1) definition of specific questions that need to be answered by the guideline; (2) assessment of guideline quality; (3) assessment of the clinical content, validity, acceptability, applicability, and transferability of the recommendations; and (4) decisions about adoption or adaptation of the recommendations. The use of the guidelines in practice can be measured with performance indicators. Adverse effects of strict adherence to guideline recommendations should be prevented, in particular when the improvement of patient outcomes is unclear. COPD guidelines should be updated at least every 2 years. Collaboration between COPD guideline developers is recommended to prevent duplication of effort.",
author = "Burgers, {Jako S.} and Anzueto, {Antonio R} and Black, {Peter N.} and Cruz, {Alvaro A.} and B{\'e}atrice Fervers and Graham, {Ian D.} and Mark Metersky and Mark Woodhead and Yawn, {Barbara P.}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1513/pats.201208-067ST",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "304--310",
journal = "Annals of the American Thoracic Society",
issn = "2325-6621",
publisher = "American Thoracic Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adaptation, evaluation, and updating of guidelines

T2 - Article 14 in integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report

AU - Burgers, Jako S.

AU - Anzueto, Antonio R

AU - Black, Peter N.

AU - Cruz, Alvaro A.

AU - Fervers, Béatrice

AU - Graham, Ian D.

AU - Metersky, Mark

AU - Woodhead, Mark

AU - Yawn, Barbara P.

PY - 2012/12/15

Y1 - 2012/12/15

N2 - Introduction: Professional societies, like many other organizations, have recognized the need to use more rigorous processes to ensure that health care recommendations are informed by the best available research evidence. Thisisthe last of a series of 14 articles that methodologists and researchers from around the world have prepared to advise guideline developers in respiratory and other diseases on how to achieve this. We updated a review of the literature on guideline adaptation, evaluation, and updating, focusing on four key questions. Methods: In this review we addressed the following questions. (1) Which high-quality guidelines on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are available? (2) How should guidelines be adapted to the user's context and culture? (3) How should the use of guidelinesbe evaluated in clinical practice? and (4) How should guidelines be efficiently keptup-to-date? We did not conduct systematic reviews ourselves. We relied on a literature review published in 2006 and on a manual produced by the ADAPTE Collaboration to inform our judgments, as wellas our collective experience and workshop discussions. Results and Discussion: Guideline adaptation can be seen as an alternative to de novo development and as part of an implementation process, taking into consideration the user's own context. A systematic approach should be followed toensure high quality of the resulting guidance. On the topic of COPD, many guidelines are available. Guidelines of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease and of the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society are particularly well-suited for adaptation. The adaptation process includes (1) definition of specific questions that need to be answered by the guideline; (2) assessment of guideline quality; (3) assessment of the clinical content, validity, acceptability, applicability, and transferability of the recommendations; and (4) decisions about adoption or adaptation of the recommendations. The use of the guidelines in practice can be measured with performance indicators. Adverse effects of strict adherence to guideline recommendations should be prevented, in particular when the improvement of patient outcomes is unclear. COPD guidelines should be updated at least every 2 years. Collaboration between COPD guideline developers is recommended to prevent duplication of effort.

AB - Introduction: Professional societies, like many other organizations, have recognized the need to use more rigorous processes to ensure that health care recommendations are informed by the best available research evidence. Thisisthe last of a series of 14 articles that methodologists and researchers from around the world have prepared to advise guideline developers in respiratory and other diseases on how to achieve this. We updated a review of the literature on guideline adaptation, evaluation, and updating, focusing on four key questions. Methods: In this review we addressed the following questions. (1) Which high-quality guidelines on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are available? (2) How should guidelines be adapted to the user's context and culture? (3) How should the use of guidelinesbe evaluated in clinical practice? and (4) How should guidelines be efficiently keptup-to-date? We did not conduct systematic reviews ourselves. We relied on a literature review published in 2006 and on a manual produced by the ADAPTE Collaboration to inform our judgments, as wellas our collective experience and workshop discussions. Results and Discussion: Guideline adaptation can be seen as an alternative to de novo development and as part of an implementation process, taking into consideration the user's own context. A systematic approach should be followed toensure high quality of the resulting guidance. On the topic of COPD, many guidelines are available. Guidelines of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease and of the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society are particularly well-suited for adaptation. The adaptation process includes (1) definition of specific questions that need to be answered by the guideline; (2) assessment of guideline quality; (3) assessment of the clinical content, validity, acceptability, applicability, and transferability of the recommendations; and (4) decisions about adoption or adaptation of the recommendations. The use of the guidelines in practice can be measured with performance indicators. Adverse effects of strict adherence to guideline recommendations should be prevented, in particular when the improvement of patient outcomes is unclear. COPD guidelines should be updated at least every 2 years. Collaboration between COPD guideline developers is recommended to prevent duplication of effort.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872694372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872694372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1513/pats.201208-067ST

DO - 10.1513/pats.201208-067ST

M3 - Article

C2 - 23256175

AN - SCOPUS:84872694372

VL - 9

SP - 304

EP - 310

JO - Annals of the American Thoracic Society

JF - Annals of the American Thoracic Society

SN - 2325-6621

IS - 5

ER -