Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited

Simon B. Eickhoff, Danilo Bzdok, Angela R. Laird, Florian Kurth, Peter T Fox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

505 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A widely used technique for coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging data is activation likelihood estimation (ALE), which determines the convergence of foci reported from different experiments. ALE analysis involves modelling these foci as probability distributions whose width is based on empirical estimates of the spatial uncertainty due to the between-subject and between-template variability of neuroimaging data. ALE results are assessed against a null-distribution of random spatial association between experiments, resulting in random-effects inference. In the present revision of this algorithm, we address two remaining drawbacks of the previous algorithm. First, the assessment of spatial association between experiments was based on a highly time-consuming permutation test, which nevertheless entailed the danger of underestimating the right tail of the null-distribution. In this report, we outline how this previous approach may be replaced by a faster and more precise analytical method. Second, the previously applied correction procedure, i.e. controlling the false discovery rate (FDR), is supplemented by new approaches for correcting the family-wise error rate and the cluster-level significance. The different alternatives for drawing inference on meta-analytic results are evaluated on an exemplary dataset on face perception as well as discussed with respect to their methodological limitations and advantages. In summary, we thus replaced the previous permutation algorithm with a faster and more rigorous analytical solution for the null-distribution and comprehensively address the issue of multiple-comparison corrections. The proposed revision of the ALE-algorithm should provide an improved tool for conducting coordinate-based meta-analyses on functional imaging data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2349-2361
Number of pages13
JournalNeuroImage
Volume59
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2012

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Neuroimaging
Uncertainty

Keywords

  • Cluster-thresholding
  • FMRI
  • Inference
  • Permutation
  • PET

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neurology

Cite this

Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited. / Eickhoff, Simon B.; Bzdok, Danilo; Laird, Angela R.; Kurth, Florian; Fox, Peter T.

In: NeuroImage, Vol. 59, No. 3, 01.02.2012, p. 2349-2361.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Eickhoff, SB, Bzdok, D, Laird, AR, Kurth, F & Fox, PT 2012, 'Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited', NeuroImage, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 2349-2361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.017
Eickhoff, Simon B. ; Bzdok, Danilo ; Laird, Angela R. ; Kurth, Florian ; Fox, Peter T. / Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited. In: NeuroImage. 2012 ; Vol. 59, No. 3. pp. 2349-2361.
@article{36e02d37d3c144f1910f1c6376ee0bcd,
title = "Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited",
abstract = "A widely used technique for coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging data is activation likelihood estimation (ALE), which determines the convergence of foci reported from different experiments. ALE analysis involves modelling these foci as probability distributions whose width is based on empirical estimates of the spatial uncertainty due to the between-subject and between-template variability of neuroimaging data. ALE results are assessed against a null-distribution of random spatial association between experiments, resulting in random-effects inference. In the present revision of this algorithm, we address two remaining drawbacks of the previous algorithm. First, the assessment of spatial association between experiments was based on a highly time-consuming permutation test, which nevertheless entailed the danger of underestimating the right tail of the null-distribution. In this report, we outline how this previous approach may be replaced by a faster and more precise analytical method. Second, the previously applied correction procedure, i.e. controlling the false discovery rate (FDR), is supplemented by new approaches for correcting the family-wise error rate and the cluster-level significance. The different alternatives for drawing inference on meta-analytic results are evaluated on an exemplary dataset on face perception as well as discussed with respect to their methodological limitations and advantages. In summary, we thus replaced the previous permutation algorithm with a faster and more rigorous analytical solution for the null-distribution and comprehensively address the issue of multiple-comparison corrections. The proposed revision of the ALE-algorithm should provide an improved tool for conducting coordinate-based meta-analyses on functional imaging data.",
keywords = "Cluster-thresholding, FMRI, Inference, Permutation, PET",
author = "Eickhoff, {Simon B.} and Danilo Bzdok and Laird, {Angela R.} and Florian Kurth and Fox, {Peter T}",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "2349--2361",
journal = "NeuroImage",
issn = "1053-8119",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited

AU - Eickhoff, Simon B.

AU - Bzdok, Danilo

AU - Laird, Angela R.

AU - Kurth, Florian

AU - Fox, Peter T

PY - 2012/2/1

Y1 - 2012/2/1

N2 - A widely used technique for coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging data is activation likelihood estimation (ALE), which determines the convergence of foci reported from different experiments. ALE analysis involves modelling these foci as probability distributions whose width is based on empirical estimates of the spatial uncertainty due to the between-subject and between-template variability of neuroimaging data. ALE results are assessed against a null-distribution of random spatial association between experiments, resulting in random-effects inference. In the present revision of this algorithm, we address two remaining drawbacks of the previous algorithm. First, the assessment of spatial association between experiments was based on a highly time-consuming permutation test, which nevertheless entailed the danger of underestimating the right tail of the null-distribution. In this report, we outline how this previous approach may be replaced by a faster and more precise analytical method. Second, the previously applied correction procedure, i.e. controlling the false discovery rate (FDR), is supplemented by new approaches for correcting the family-wise error rate and the cluster-level significance. The different alternatives for drawing inference on meta-analytic results are evaluated on an exemplary dataset on face perception as well as discussed with respect to their methodological limitations and advantages. In summary, we thus replaced the previous permutation algorithm with a faster and more rigorous analytical solution for the null-distribution and comprehensively address the issue of multiple-comparison corrections. The proposed revision of the ALE-algorithm should provide an improved tool for conducting coordinate-based meta-analyses on functional imaging data.

AB - A widely used technique for coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging data is activation likelihood estimation (ALE), which determines the convergence of foci reported from different experiments. ALE analysis involves modelling these foci as probability distributions whose width is based on empirical estimates of the spatial uncertainty due to the between-subject and between-template variability of neuroimaging data. ALE results are assessed against a null-distribution of random spatial association between experiments, resulting in random-effects inference. In the present revision of this algorithm, we address two remaining drawbacks of the previous algorithm. First, the assessment of spatial association between experiments was based on a highly time-consuming permutation test, which nevertheless entailed the danger of underestimating the right tail of the null-distribution. In this report, we outline how this previous approach may be replaced by a faster and more precise analytical method. Second, the previously applied correction procedure, i.e. controlling the false discovery rate (FDR), is supplemented by new approaches for correcting the family-wise error rate and the cluster-level significance. The different alternatives for drawing inference on meta-analytic results are evaluated on an exemplary dataset on face perception as well as discussed with respect to their methodological limitations and advantages. In summary, we thus replaced the previous permutation algorithm with a faster and more rigorous analytical solution for the null-distribution and comprehensively address the issue of multiple-comparison corrections. The proposed revision of the ALE-algorithm should provide an improved tool for conducting coordinate-based meta-analyses on functional imaging data.

KW - Cluster-thresholding

KW - FMRI

KW - Inference

KW - Permutation

KW - PET

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855468491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855468491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.017

DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.017

M3 - Article

C2 - 21963913

AN - SCOPUS:84855468491

VL - 59

SP - 2349

EP - 2361

JO - NeuroImage

JF - NeuroImage

SN - 1053-8119

IS - 3

ER -