Accuracy of various methods of measuring the transvalvular pressure gradient in aortic stenosis

Walter C. Brogan, Richard A. Lange, L. David Hillis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study was done to assess the accuracy of various techniques of measuring the pressure gradient and valve area in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). In 18 patients with AS, the pressure gradient was quantitated from (1) simultaneous left ventricular and ascending aortic pressures (LV-AO), (2) nonsimultaneous LV-AO pullback, (3) LV and femoral arterial (FA) pressures unadjusted for the time delay of the FA tracing (LV-FA unadjusted), and (4) LV-FA adjusted for time delay. In comparison to simultaneous LV-AO, the pressure gradient was greater with LV-FA unadjusted and less with LV-FA adjusted for time delay (p < 0.05). In nine patients with a mean gradient <35 mm Hg, the difference in valve area between simultaneous LV-AO and pullback averaged 0.17 ± 0.10 cm2; between LV-AO and LV-FA unadjusted, the difference averaged 0.11 ± 0.14 cm2; and between LV-AO and LV-FA adjusted, the difference averaged 0.52 ± 0.36 cm2. These differences in valve area resulted in a discordant classification of the severity of AS in eight of the nine patients. Thus the use of an LV-AO pullback or an LV-FA gradient for assessing the severity of AS may yield inaccurate results, especially in patients with low (<35 mm Hg) gradients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)948-953
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Heart Journal
Volume123
Issue number4 PART 1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Aortic Valve Stenosis
Thigh
Pressure
Arterial Pressure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Accuracy of various methods of measuring the transvalvular pressure gradient in aortic stenosis. / Brogan, Walter C.; Lange, Richard A.; David Hillis, L.

In: American Heart Journal, Vol. 123, No. 4 PART 1, 1992, p. 948-953.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brogan, Walter C. ; Lange, Richard A. ; David Hillis, L. / Accuracy of various methods of measuring the transvalvular pressure gradient in aortic stenosis. In: American Heart Journal. 1992 ; Vol. 123, No. 4 PART 1. pp. 948-953.
@article{6ab86e0447094448b8d1365a16675a76,
title = "Accuracy of various methods of measuring the transvalvular pressure gradient in aortic stenosis",
abstract = "This study was done to assess the accuracy of various techniques of measuring the pressure gradient and valve area in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). In 18 patients with AS, the pressure gradient was quantitated from (1) simultaneous left ventricular and ascending aortic pressures (LV-AO), (2) nonsimultaneous LV-AO pullback, (3) LV and femoral arterial (FA) pressures unadjusted for the time delay of the FA tracing (LV-FA unadjusted), and (4) LV-FA adjusted for time delay. In comparison to simultaneous LV-AO, the pressure gradient was greater with LV-FA unadjusted and less with LV-FA adjusted for time delay (p < 0.05). In nine patients with a mean gradient <35 mm Hg, the difference in valve area between simultaneous LV-AO and pullback averaged 0.17 ± 0.10 cm2; between LV-AO and LV-FA unadjusted, the difference averaged 0.11 ± 0.14 cm2; and between LV-AO and LV-FA adjusted, the difference averaged 0.52 ± 0.36 cm2. These differences in valve area resulted in a discordant classification of the severity of AS in eight of the nine patients. Thus the use of an LV-AO pullback or an LV-FA gradient for assessing the severity of AS may yield inaccurate results, especially in patients with low (<35 mm Hg) gradients.",
author = "Brogan, {Walter C.} and Lange, {Richard A.} and {David Hillis}, L.",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1016/0002-8703(92)90701-V",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "123",
pages = "948--953",
journal = "American Heart Journal",
issn = "0002-8703",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4 PART 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of various methods of measuring the transvalvular pressure gradient in aortic stenosis

AU - Brogan, Walter C.

AU - Lange, Richard A.

AU - David Hillis, L.

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - This study was done to assess the accuracy of various techniques of measuring the pressure gradient and valve area in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). In 18 patients with AS, the pressure gradient was quantitated from (1) simultaneous left ventricular and ascending aortic pressures (LV-AO), (2) nonsimultaneous LV-AO pullback, (3) LV and femoral arterial (FA) pressures unadjusted for the time delay of the FA tracing (LV-FA unadjusted), and (4) LV-FA adjusted for time delay. In comparison to simultaneous LV-AO, the pressure gradient was greater with LV-FA unadjusted and less with LV-FA adjusted for time delay (p < 0.05). In nine patients with a mean gradient <35 mm Hg, the difference in valve area between simultaneous LV-AO and pullback averaged 0.17 ± 0.10 cm2; between LV-AO and LV-FA unadjusted, the difference averaged 0.11 ± 0.14 cm2; and between LV-AO and LV-FA adjusted, the difference averaged 0.52 ± 0.36 cm2. These differences in valve area resulted in a discordant classification of the severity of AS in eight of the nine patients. Thus the use of an LV-AO pullback or an LV-FA gradient for assessing the severity of AS may yield inaccurate results, especially in patients with low (<35 mm Hg) gradients.

AB - This study was done to assess the accuracy of various techniques of measuring the pressure gradient and valve area in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). In 18 patients with AS, the pressure gradient was quantitated from (1) simultaneous left ventricular and ascending aortic pressures (LV-AO), (2) nonsimultaneous LV-AO pullback, (3) LV and femoral arterial (FA) pressures unadjusted for the time delay of the FA tracing (LV-FA unadjusted), and (4) LV-FA adjusted for time delay. In comparison to simultaneous LV-AO, the pressure gradient was greater with LV-FA unadjusted and less with LV-FA adjusted for time delay (p < 0.05). In nine patients with a mean gradient <35 mm Hg, the difference in valve area between simultaneous LV-AO and pullback averaged 0.17 ± 0.10 cm2; between LV-AO and LV-FA unadjusted, the difference averaged 0.11 ± 0.14 cm2; and between LV-AO and LV-FA adjusted, the difference averaged 0.52 ± 0.36 cm2. These differences in valve area resulted in a discordant classification of the severity of AS in eight of the nine patients. Thus the use of an LV-AO pullback or an LV-FA gradient for assessing the severity of AS may yield inaccurate results, especially in patients with low (<35 mm Hg) gradients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026545212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026545212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0002-8703(92)90701-V

DO - 10.1016/0002-8703(92)90701-V

M3 - Article

C2 - 1550005

AN - SCOPUS:0026545212

VL - 123

SP - 948

EP - 953

JO - American Heart Journal

JF - American Heart Journal

SN - 0002-8703

IS - 4 PART 1

ER -