Accuracy of a urinary catheter surveillance protocol

Allison C. Burns, Nancy J. Petersen, Armandina Garza, Monisha Arya, Jan E Patterson, Aanand D. Naik, Barbara W. Trautner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Many hospitals are increasing surveillance for catheter-associated urinary tract infections, which requires documentation of urinary catheter device-days. However, device-days are usually obtained by chart review or nursing reports. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that chart review can provide accurate urinary catheter data compared with physical inspection of the urinary catheter at the bedside. Methods: We compared 2 methods for collecting urinary catheter data over a 6-month period on 10 wards at our VA hospital. For the chart reviews, we created a daily bed-occupancy roster from the electronic medical record. Catheter data were extracted from the daily progress notes for each patient using a standardized review process. Bedside reviews were conducted by visiting the ward and verifying the presence and type of urinary catheters. Agreement between the 2 methods was calculated. Results: We obtained urinary catheter data by both methods in 621 cases. The presence or type of urinary catheter differed between chart and bedside review in only 10 cases (1.6%). Chart review had a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 97.7%, raw agreement of 98.4%, and a κ value of 0.96. Conclusions: Individual chart review in the electronic medical record provided very accurate data on urinary catheter use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)55-58
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Infection Control
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2012

Fingerprint

Urinary Catheters
Electronic Health Records
Bed Occupancy
Catheter-Related Infections
Equipment and Supplies
Urinary Tract Infections
Documentation
Nursing
Catheters

Keywords

  • Catheter-associated urinary tract infection
  • Chart review
  • Infection
  • Infection control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Burns, A. C., Petersen, N. J., Garza, A., Arya, M., Patterson, J. E., Naik, A. D., & Trautner, B. W. (2012). Accuracy of a urinary catheter surveillance protocol. American Journal of Infection Control, 40(1), 55-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2011.04.006

Accuracy of a urinary catheter surveillance protocol. / Burns, Allison C.; Petersen, Nancy J.; Garza, Armandina; Arya, Monisha; Patterson, Jan E; Naik, Aanand D.; Trautner, Barbara W.

In: American Journal of Infection Control, Vol. 40, No. 1, 02.2012, p. 55-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Burns, AC, Petersen, NJ, Garza, A, Arya, M, Patterson, JE, Naik, AD & Trautner, BW 2012, 'Accuracy of a urinary catheter surveillance protocol', American Journal of Infection Control, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 55-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2011.04.006
Burns, Allison C. ; Petersen, Nancy J. ; Garza, Armandina ; Arya, Monisha ; Patterson, Jan E ; Naik, Aanand D. ; Trautner, Barbara W. / Accuracy of a urinary catheter surveillance protocol. In: American Journal of Infection Control. 2012 ; Vol. 40, No. 1. pp. 55-58.
@article{d8798f503c144aaeb49352d9026cf3f1,
title = "Accuracy of a urinary catheter surveillance protocol",
abstract = "Background: Many hospitals are increasing surveillance for catheter-associated urinary tract infections, which requires documentation of urinary catheter device-days. However, device-days are usually obtained by chart review or nursing reports. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that chart review can provide accurate urinary catheter data compared with physical inspection of the urinary catheter at the bedside. Methods: We compared 2 methods for collecting urinary catheter data over a 6-month period on 10 wards at our VA hospital. For the chart reviews, we created a daily bed-occupancy roster from the electronic medical record. Catheter data were extracted from the daily progress notes for each patient using a standardized review process. Bedside reviews were conducted by visiting the ward and verifying the presence and type of urinary catheters. Agreement between the 2 methods was calculated. Results: We obtained urinary catheter data by both methods in 621 cases. The presence or type of urinary catheter differed between chart and bedside review in only 10 cases (1.6{\%}). Chart review had a sensitivity of 100{\%}, a specificity of 97.7{\%}, raw agreement of 98.4{\%}, and a κ value of 0.96. Conclusions: Individual chart review in the electronic medical record provided very accurate data on urinary catheter use.",
keywords = "Catheter-associated urinary tract infection, Chart review, Infection, Infection control",
author = "Burns, {Allison C.} and Petersen, {Nancy J.} and Armandina Garza and Monisha Arya and Patterson, {Jan E} and Naik, {Aanand D.} and Trautner, {Barbara W.}",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajic.2011.04.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "55--58",
journal = "American Journal of Infection Control",
issn = "0196-6553",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of a urinary catheter surveillance protocol

AU - Burns, Allison C.

AU - Petersen, Nancy J.

AU - Garza, Armandina

AU - Arya, Monisha

AU - Patterson, Jan E

AU - Naik, Aanand D.

AU - Trautner, Barbara W.

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - Background: Many hospitals are increasing surveillance for catheter-associated urinary tract infections, which requires documentation of urinary catheter device-days. However, device-days are usually obtained by chart review or nursing reports. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that chart review can provide accurate urinary catheter data compared with physical inspection of the urinary catheter at the bedside. Methods: We compared 2 methods for collecting urinary catheter data over a 6-month period on 10 wards at our VA hospital. For the chart reviews, we created a daily bed-occupancy roster from the electronic medical record. Catheter data were extracted from the daily progress notes for each patient using a standardized review process. Bedside reviews were conducted by visiting the ward and verifying the presence and type of urinary catheters. Agreement between the 2 methods was calculated. Results: We obtained urinary catheter data by both methods in 621 cases. The presence or type of urinary catheter differed between chart and bedside review in only 10 cases (1.6%). Chart review had a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 97.7%, raw agreement of 98.4%, and a κ value of 0.96. Conclusions: Individual chart review in the electronic medical record provided very accurate data on urinary catheter use.

AB - Background: Many hospitals are increasing surveillance for catheter-associated urinary tract infections, which requires documentation of urinary catheter device-days. However, device-days are usually obtained by chart review or nursing reports. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that chart review can provide accurate urinary catheter data compared with physical inspection of the urinary catheter at the bedside. Methods: We compared 2 methods for collecting urinary catheter data over a 6-month period on 10 wards at our VA hospital. For the chart reviews, we created a daily bed-occupancy roster from the electronic medical record. Catheter data were extracted from the daily progress notes for each patient using a standardized review process. Bedside reviews were conducted by visiting the ward and verifying the presence and type of urinary catheters. Agreement between the 2 methods was calculated. Results: We obtained urinary catheter data by both methods in 621 cases. The presence or type of urinary catheter differed between chart and bedside review in only 10 cases (1.6%). Chart review had a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 97.7%, raw agreement of 98.4%, and a κ value of 0.96. Conclusions: Individual chart review in the electronic medical record provided very accurate data on urinary catheter use.

KW - Catheter-associated urinary tract infection

KW - Chart review

KW - Infection

KW - Infection control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856540998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856540998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.04.006

DO - 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.04.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 21813209

AN - SCOPUS:84856540998

VL - 40

SP - 55

EP - 58

JO - American Journal of Infection Control

JF - American Journal of Infection Control

SN - 0196-6553

IS - 1

ER -