A Retrospective Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes after Obturation with Resilon/Epiphany or Gutta-Percha/Kerr Sealer

Taylor P. Cotton, William G. Schindler, Scott A. Schwartz, William R. Watson, Kenneth M Hargreaves

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the treatment outcome of root canal systems obturated with gutta-percha and Kerr Pulp Canal Sealer compared with Resilon and Epiphany sealer. One hundred three teeth treated in a private endodontic practice were included in the study. Clinical outcomes (healed versus nonhealed) were assessed by using the Periapical Index determination and clinical evaluation at recall appointments. The magnitude of the association between obturation materials used and outcome measured was evaluated with univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Univariate analysis indicated that pulpal vitality, presence of a preoperative lesion, and length of recall times were statistically significant in predicting the outcome. Logistic regression analysis showed that age, tooth position, and length of recall times were statistically significant in predicting the outcome. Root canal systems obturated with gutta-percha and Kerr Pulp Canal Sealer or Resilon and Epiphany sealer had statistically indistinguishable differences in clinical outcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)789-797
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Endodontics
Volume34
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2008

Fingerprint

Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate
Gutta-Percha
Dental Pulp Cavity
Tooth
Retrospective Studies
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Private Practice
Endodontics
Appointments and Schedules
epiphany sealer
Kerr Pulp Canal Sealer
resilon sealer

Keywords

  • Clinical
  • endodontic
  • Epiphany
  • gutta-percha
  • outcome assessment
  • Resilon
  • sealer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

A Retrospective Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes after Obturation with Resilon/Epiphany or Gutta-Percha/Kerr Sealer. / Cotton, Taylor P.; Schindler, William G.; Schwartz, Scott A.; Watson, William R.; Hargreaves, Kenneth M.

In: Journal of Endodontics, Vol. 34, No. 7, 07.2008, p. 789-797.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cotton, Taylor P. ; Schindler, William G. ; Schwartz, Scott A. ; Watson, William R. ; Hargreaves, Kenneth M. / A Retrospective Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes after Obturation with Resilon/Epiphany or Gutta-Percha/Kerr Sealer. In: Journal of Endodontics. 2008 ; Vol. 34, No. 7. pp. 789-797.
@article{4e2a22c603514c1a9555c8ae7cf5478d,
title = "A Retrospective Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes after Obturation with Resilon/Epiphany or Gutta-Percha/Kerr Sealer",
abstract = "The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the treatment outcome of root canal systems obturated with gutta-percha and Kerr Pulp Canal Sealer compared with Resilon and Epiphany sealer. One hundred three teeth treated in a private endodontic practice were included in the study. Clinical outcomes (healed versus nonhealed) were assessed by using the Periapical Index determination and clinical evaluation at recall appointments. The magnitude of the association between obturation materials used and outcome measured was evaluated with univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Univariate analysis indicated that pulpal vitality, presence of a preoperative lesion, and length of recall times were statistically significant in predicting the outcome. Logistic regression analysis showed that age, tooth position, and length of recall times were statistically significant in predicting the outcome. Root canal systems obturated with gutta-percha and Kerr Pulp Canal Sealer or Resilon and Epiphany sealer had statistically indistinguishable differences in clinical outcome.",
keywords = "Clinical, endodontic, Epiphany, gutta-percha, outcome assessment, Resilon, sealer",
author = "Cotton, {Taylor P.} and Schindler, {William G.} and Schwartz, {Scott A.} and Watson, {William R.} and Hargreaves, {Kenneth M}",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "789--797",
journal = "Journal of Endodontics",
issn = "0099-2399",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Retrospective Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes after Obturation with Resilon/Epiphany or Gutta-Percha/Kerr Sealer

AU - Cotton, Taylor P.

AU - Schindler, William G.

AU - Schwartz, Scott A.

AU - Watson, William R.

AU - Hargreaves, Kenneth M

PY - 2008/7

Y1 - 2008/7

N2 - The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the treatment outcome of root canal systems obturated with gutta-percha and Kerr Pulp Canal Sealer compared with Resilon and Epiphany sealer. One hundred three teeth treated in a private endodontic practice were included in the study. Clinical outcomes (healed versus nonhealed) were assessed by using the Periapical Index determination and clinical evaluation at recall appointments. The magnitude of the association between obturation materials used and outcome measured was evaluated with univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Univariate analysis indicated that pulpal vitality, presence of a preoperative lesion, and length of recall times were statistically significant in predicting the outcome. Logistic regression analysis showed that age, tooth position, and length of recall times were statistically significant in predicting the outcome. Root canal systems obturated with gutta-percha and Kerr Pulp Canal Sealer or Resilon and Epiphany sealer had statistically indistinguishable differences in clinical outcome.

AB - The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the treatment outcome of root canal systems obturated with gutta-percha and Kerr Pulp Canal Sealer compared with Resilon and Epiphany sealer. One hundred three teeth treated in a private endodontic practice were included in the study. Clinical outcomes (healed versus nonhealed) were assessed by using the Periapical Index determination and clinical evaluation at recall appointments. The magnitude of the association between obturation materials used and outcome measured was evaluated with univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Univariate analysis indicated that pulpal vitality, presence of a preoperative lesion, and length of recall times were statistically significant in predicting the outcome. Logistic regression analysis showed that age, tooth position, and length of recall times were statistically significant in predicting the outcome. Root canal systems obturated with gutta-percha and Kerr Pulp Canal Sealer or Resilon and Epiphany sealer had statistically indistinguishable differences in clinical outcome.

KW - Clinical

KW - endodontic

KW - Epiphany

KW - gutta-percha

KW - outcome assessment

KW - Resilon

KW - sealer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=45049085324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=45049085324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.018

DO - 10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.018

M3 - Article

C2 - 18570981

AN - SCOPUS:45049085324

VL - 34

SP - 789

EP - 797

JO - Journal of Endodontics

JF - Journal of Endodontics

SN - 0099-2399

IS - 7

ER -