A randomized study of scleroderma health state values: A picture is worth a thousand words, and quite a few utilities

Dinesh Khanna, Robert M. Kaplan, Mark H. Eckman, Ron D. Hays, Anthony C. Leonard, Shaari S. Ginsburg, Joel Tsevat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. Assigning utilities to hypothetical health states requires that the health states be described in adequate detail, but there is no agreement on exactly how health states should be described. We assess utilities from the general public for health states common in scleroderma (SSc) by describing the health states in writing alone v. with photographs of patients with SSc. Methods. Subjects rated several SSc health states on a 0 to 100 rating scale (RS) and completed computer-assisted time tradeoff (TTO; range, 0.0-1.0) and standard gamble (SG; range, 0.0-1.0) assessments. Half of the subjects were assigned to be shown photographs of patients with SSc health states in addition to written health state descriptions, whereas the other half were given only the written descriptions. Results. Of the 213 participants, 133 (62%) were female, 138 (65%) were Caucasian, and 62 (29%) were African American. Median RS, TTO, and SG scores for 5 SSc health states ranged from 20 to 70, 0.28 to 0.94, and 0.50 to 0.90, respectively. In bivariate analyses, showing pictures was associated with lower RS scores for 2 of 5 health states and lower SG values for all 5 health states (P < 0:05 for comparison of pictures v. no pictures), but with no difference in TTO values. Multivariable analyses revealed negative associations between pictures and SG valuations for the 3 most severe SSc health states (R2 range, 0.04-0.08). Conclusion. Adding pictures of people with SSc to written health state descriptions can affect valuations of SSc health states, although the effect differs by valuation measurement method and by health state severity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7-14
Number of pages8
JournalMedical Decision Making
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health
African Americans
Public Health

Keywords

  • Measurement methods
  • Quality of life
  • Scleroderma
  • Utility assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

A randomized study of scleroderma health state values : A picture is worth a thousand words, and quite a few utilities. / Khanna, Dinesh; Kaplan, Robert M.; Eckman, Mark H.; Hays, Ron D.; Leonard, Anthony C.; Ginsburg, Shaari S.; Tsevat, Joel.

In: Medical Decision Making, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.01.2009, p. 7-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Khanna, Dinesh ; Kaplan, Robert M. ; Eckman, Mark H. ; Hays, Ron D. ; Leonard, Anthony C. ; Ginsburg, Shaari S. ; Tsevat, Joel. / A randomized study of scleroderma health state values : A picture is worth a thousand words, and quite a few utilities. In: Medical Decision Making. 2009 ; Vol. 29, No. 1. pp. 7-14.
@article{d6296b43241541f6ad74693999833e30,
title = "A randomized study of scleroderma health state values: A picture is worth a thousand words, and quite a few utilities",
abstract = "Objective. Assigning utilities to hypothetical health states requires that the health states be described in adequate detail, but there is no agreement on exactly how health states should be described. We assess utilities from the general public for health states common in scleroderma (SSc) by describing the health states in writing alone v. with photographs of patients with SSc. Methods. Subjects rated several SSc health states on a 0 to 100 rating scale (RS) and completed computer-assisted time tradeoff (TTO; range, 0.0-1.0) and standard gamble (SG; range, 0.0-1.0) assessments. Half of the subjects were assigned to be shown photographs of patients with SSc health states in addition to written health state descriptions, whereas the other half were given only the written descriptions. Results. Of the 213 participants, 133 (62{\%}) were female, 138 (65{\%}) were Caucasian, and 62 (29{\%}) were African American. Median RS, TTO, and SG scores for 5 SSc health states ranged from 20 to 70, 0.28 to 0.94, and 0.50 to 0.90, respectively. In bivariate analyses, showing pictures was associated with lower RS scores for 2 of 5 health states and lower SG values for all 5 health states (P < 0:05 for comparison of pictures v. no pictures), but with no difference in TTO values. Multivariable analyses revealed negative associations between pictures and SG valuations for the 3 most severe SSc health states (R2 range, 0.04-0.08). Conclusion. Adding pictures of people with SSc to written health state descriptions can affect valuations of SSc health states, although the effect differs by valuation measurement method and by health state severity.",
keywords = "Measurement methods, Quality of life, Scleroderma, Utility assessment",
author = "Dinesh Khanna and Kaplan, {Robert M.} and Eckman, {Mark H.} and Hays, {Ron D.} and Leonard, {Anthony C.} and Ginsburg, {Shaari S.} and Joel Tsevat",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0272989X08322010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "7--14",
journal = "Medical Decision Making",
issn = "0272-989X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A randomized study of scleroderma health state values

T2 - A picture is worth a thousand words, and quite a few utilities

AU - Khanna, Dinesh

AU - Kaplan, Robert M.

AU - Eckman, Mark H.

AU - Hays, Ron D.

AU - Leonard, Anthony C.

AU - Ginsburg, Shaari S.

AU - Tsevat, Joel

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Objective. Assigning utilities to hypothetical health states requires that the health states be described in adequate detail, but there is no agreement on exactly how health states should be described. We assess utilities from the general public for health states common in scleroderma (SSc) by describing the health states in writing alone v. with photographs of patients with SSc. Methods. Subjects rated several SSc health states on a 0 to 100 rating scale (RS) and completed computer-assisted time tradeoff (TTO; range, 0.0-1.0) and standard gamble (SG; range, 0.0-1.0) assessments. Half of the subjects were assigned to be shown photographs of patients with SSc health states in addition to written health state descriptions, whereas the other half were given only the written descriptions. Results. Of the 213 participants, 133 (62%) were female, 138 (65%) were Caucasian, and 62 (29%) were African American. Median RS, TTO, and SG scores for 5 SSc health states ranged from 20 to 70, 0.28 to 0.94, and 0.50 to 0.90, respectively. In bivariate analyses, showing pictures was associated with lower RS scores for 2 of 5 health states and lower SG values for all 5 health states (P < 0:05 for comparison of pictures v. no pictures), but with no difference in TTO values. Multivariable analyses revealed negative associations between pictures and SG valuations for the 3 most severe SSc health states (R2 range, 0.04-0.08). Conclusion. Adding pictures of people with SSc to written health state descriptions can affect valuations of SSc health states, although the effect differs by valuation measurement method and by health state severity.

AB - Objective. Assigning utilities to hypothetical health states requires that the health states be described in adequate detail, but there is no agreement on exactly how health states should be described. We assess utilities from the general public for health states common in scleroderma (SSc) by describing the health states in writing alone v. with photographs of patients with SSc. Methods. Subjects rated several SSc health states on a 0 to 100 rating scale (RS) and completed computer-assisted time tradeoff (TTO; range, 0.0-1.0) and standard gamble (SG; range, 0.0-1.0) assessments. Half of the subjects were assigned to be shown photographs of patients with SSc health states in addition to written health state descriptions, whereas the other half were given only the written descriptions. Results. Of the 213 participants, 133 (62%) were female, 138 (65%) were Caucasian, and 62 (29%) were African American. Median RS, TTO, and SG scores for 5 SSc health states ranged from 20 to 70, 0.28 to 0.94, and 0.50 to 0.90, respectively. In bivariate analyses, showing pictures was associated with lower RS scores for 2 of 5 health states and lower SG values for all 5 health states (P < 0:05 for comparison of pictures v. no pictures), but with no difference in TTO values. Multivariable analyses revealed negative associations between pictures and SG valuations for the 3 most severe SSc health states (R2 range, 0.04-0.08). Conclusion. Adding pictures of people with SSc to written health state descriptions can affect valuations of SSc health states, although the effect differs by valuation measurement method and by health state severity.

KW - Measurement methods

KW - Quality of life

KW - Scleroderma

KW - Utility assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=59549098911&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=59549098911&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0272989X08322010

DO - 10.1177/0272989X08322010

M3 - Article

C2 - 19015284

AN - SCOPUS:59549098911

VL - 29

SP - 7

EP - 14

JO - Medical Decision Making

JF - Medical Decision Making

SN - 0272-989X

IS - 1

ER -