A randomized controlled trial of a community-based dementia care coordination intervention: Effects of MIND at home on caregiver outcomes

Jeremy A. Tanner, Betty S. Black, Deirdre Johnston, Edward Hess, Jeannie Marie Leoutsakos, Laura N. Gitlin, Peter V. Rabins, Constantine G. Lyketsos, Quincy M. Samus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

52 Scopus citations


Objective To assess whether MIND at Home, a community-based, multicomponent, care coordination intervention, reduces unmet caregiving needs and burden in informal caregivers of persons with memory disorders. Methods An 18-month randomized controlled trial of 289 community-living care recipient (CR)-caregiver (informal caregivers, i.e., unpaid individuals who regularly assisted the CR) dyads from 28 postal code areas of Baltimore, Maryland was conducted. All dyads and the CR's primary care physician received the written needs assessment results and intervention recommendations. Intervention dyads then received an 18-month care coordination intervention delivered by nonclinical community workers to address unmet care needs through individualized care planning, referral and linkage to dementia services, provision of caregiver dementia education and skill-building strategies, and care progress monitoring by an interdisciplinary team. Primary outcome was total percent of unmet caregiver needs at 18 months. Secondary outcomes included objective and subjective caregiver burden measures, quality of life (QOL), and depression. Results Total percent of unmet caregiver needs declined in both groups from baseline to 18 months, with no statistically significant between-group difference. No significant group differences occurred in most caregiver burden measures, depression, or QOL. There was a potentially clinically relevant reduction in self-reported number of hours caregivers spent with the CR for MIND participants compared with control subjects. Conclusion No statistically significant impacts on caregiver outcomes were found after multiple comparison adjustments. However, MIND at Home appeared to have had a modest and clinically meaningful impact on informal caregiver time spent with CRs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)391-402
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015


  • Dementia
  • care coordination
  • caregiver
  • community-based
  • intervention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health


Dive into the research topics of 'A randomized controlled trial of a community-based dementia care coordination intervention: Effects of MIND at home on caregiver outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this